Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]141573
• Prostate Papers •
The value of diagnosis for prostate cancer by combining DWI with MRS
LU Yang  GE Shang  ZHU Yan  WANG Ya-ting  BO Gen-ji 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2016.05.002.


[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the value of diagnosis for prostate cancer (PCa) by combining diffusion weighted imaging (DWl) with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).Materials and Methods: Twenty-four cases of PCa and 30 cases of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) proved by pathology were examined by DWI and MRS. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of cancerous regions and peripheral zone and central glands in BPH were measured. The chemical shift of citrate (Cit), choline (Cho), creatine (Cr) spectra, and the ratio of (Cho+Cr)/Cit were observed in MRS. The upper bound of 95 confidence interval of PCa ADC and (Cho+Cr)/Cit was set as the threshold value. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DWI, MRS and DWI+MRS in the diagnosis of PCa were analyzed.Results: The ADC value of cancerous, peripheral zone and central glands in BPH were (0.83±0.12)×10-3 mm2/s, (1.82±0.26)×10-3 mm2/s, (1.46±0.16)×10-3 mm2/s (F=31.1, P<0.05). The (Cho+Cr)/Cit value of cancerousperipheral zone and central glands in BPH were 1.55±0.11, 0.53±0.16, 0.64±0.13 (F= 18.2, P<0.05). There were significant difference between cancerous and peripheral zone, central glands of BPH in the value of (Cho+Cr)/Cit respectively (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between peripheral zone and central glands of BPH in the value of (Cho+Cr)/Cit (P>0.05).The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DWI were 79.17%, 80%, 79.63%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRS were 87.5%, 86.67%, 87.03%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of DWI+MRS were 91.67%, 93.33%, 92.59%, respectively.Conclusions: The combined application with DWI and MRS was better than DWl or MRS alone in the diagnosis for prostate cancer.
[Keywords] Prostatic neoplasms；Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging；Magnetic resonance spectroscopy

LU Yang Department of Medical Imaging, the First Pople's Hospital of Huaian, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China

GE Shang Department of Medical Imaging, the First Pople's Hospital of Huaian, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China

ZHU Yan Department of Medical Imaging, the First Pople's Hospital of Huaian, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China

WANG Ya-ting Department of Medical Imaging, the First Pople's Hospital of Huaian, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China

BO Gen-ji* Department of Medical Imaging, the First Pople's Hospital of Huaian, Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Huaian 223300, China

*Correspondence to: Bo GJ, E-mail: hybgj0451@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2016-02-21
Accepted  2016-03-26
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2016.05.002
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2016.05.002.

[1]
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. 2013, CA Cancer J Clin, 2013, 63(1): 11-30.
[2]
Mazaheri Y, Shukla-Dave A, Hricak H, et al. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology, 2008, 246(2): 480-488.
[3]
Turkbey B, Bernardo M, Merino MJ, et al. MRI of localized prostate cancer: coming of age in the PSA era. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2012, 18(1): 34-45.
[4]
郭雪梅，王霄英，吴冰, 等. 前列腺外周带癌扩散加权成像诊断标准. 中国医学影像技术, 2009, 25(7): 1235-1238.
[5]
王啸，余永强，刘斌, 等. 3.0 T磁共振超高b值扩散加权成像对前列腺癌的诊断价值. 实用放射学杂志, 2013, 29(6): 954-957.
[6]
刘会佳，黄旭方，任静, 等. 磁共振弥散加权成像在中央区前列腺癌诊断中的价值. 实用放射学杂志, 2013, 29(5): 794-797.
[7]
Sutedjo J, 陈慧铀, 王利伟, 等. 磁共振波谱成像在前列腺癌中的应用. 磁共振成像, 2015, 6(1): 71-75.
[8]
Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, et al. Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 30(2): 327-334.
[9]
史浩，武乐斌，丁红宇, 等. MR动态增强、扩散成像和波谱分析在前列腺癌诊断中的价值. 中华放射学杂志, 2006, 40(7): 678-683.
[10]
赵阳，李辛子，韩悦，等．病理切片对照下国人前列腺癌MRS诊断阈值的可靠性研究. 临床放射学杂志, 2013, 32(4): 595-597.
[11]
Li B, Cai W, Lv D, et al. Comparison of MRS and DWI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer based on sextant analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 37(1): 194-200.
[12]
苗华栋，张长萃，张莹, 等. 3 T磁共振弥散成像及波谱分析在前列腺癌诊断中的价值．中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2013, 19(4): 346-349.
[13]
郭雪梅，王霄英，李飞宇, 等. 联合应用MR波谱分析与扩散加权成像定量指标行前列腺癌定量诊断．中华放射学杂志, 2010, 44(4): 387-391.
[14]
卢慧敏，夏春华，高斌. MR波谱分析对前列腺癌Gleason评分的预估价值. 实用放射学杂志, 2014, 30(2): 263-266.
[15]
Li C, Chen M, Li S, et al. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T. Acta Radiol, 2014, 55(2): 239-247.

PREV The correlation between multi-parametric MRI of prostate imaging reporting and data system score and transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy
NEXT Feasibility study of FA and ADC values by diffusion tensor imaging: classify abnormal signal nodules in prostate transition zone
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn