Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]928107
• Review •
Role of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis: a Meta-analysis
HAN Fang  YAO Zhen-wei  ZHANG Qing  XU Yang  WU Jian-lin 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.02.014.


[Abstract] Objectives: Using Meta-analysis to estimate the diagnostic value of differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis.Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane electronic databases to identify relevant published articles until June, 2016. English and Chinese language restrictions were applied. The data were analyzed by Meta-disc software.Results: Nine studies were used for general data pooling. The study included a total of 251 patients and 270 lesions. The pooled of DSC sensitivity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.93) and specificity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.94). Overall, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 4.47 (95% CI: 2.9-6.91; I2= 0, P<0.001) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.15 (95%CI: 0. 1-0.23; I2=0, P<0.001). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 33 (95% CI: 15.86, 68.66). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of DSC was 0.94 and the Q* index was 0.873. I2=0, representing a small heterogeneity between the 9 studies.Conclusion: Our Meta-analysis suggested that the rCBV values derived from DSC-MRI could be useful in differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis, DSC showed high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating glioma recurrence from radiation necrosis.
[Keywords] Magnetic resonance imaging；Relative cerebral blood volume；Meta-analysis；Glioma；Radiation necrosis

HAN Fang Department of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China

YAO Zhen-wei Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

ZHANG Qing Department of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China

XU Yang Department of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China

WU Jian-lin* Department of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, China

*Correspondence to: Wu JL, E-mail: cjr.wujianlin@vip.163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2016-12-12
Accepted  2017-01-16
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.02.014
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.02.014.

[1]
Prager AJ, Martinez N, Beal K, et al. Diffusion and perfusion MRI to differentiate treatment-related changes including pseudoprogression from recurrent tumors in high-grade gliomas with histopathologic evidence. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2015, 36(5): 877-885.
[2]
Jr HDCL, Rodriguez I, Domingues RC, et al. Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2011, 32(11): 1978-1985.
[3]
Hopewell JW, Calvo W, Jaenke R, et al. Microvasculature and radiation damage. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1993, 130: 1-16.
[4]
Oh BC, Pagnini PG, Wang MY, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery: adjacent tissue injury and response after high-dose single fraction radiation: Part I--Histology, imaging, and molecular events. Neurosurgery, 2007, 60(1): 31-44.
[5]
Xu JL, Li YL, Lian JM, et al. Distinction between postoperative recurrent glioma and radiation injury using MR diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroradiology, 2010, 52 (12): 1193-1199.
[6]
Gasparetto EL, Pawlak MA, Patel SH, et al. Posttreatment recurrence of malignant brain neoplasm: accuracy of relative cerebral blood volume fraction in discriminating low from high malignant histologic volume fraction. Radiology, 2009, 250(3): 887-896.
[7]
Ozsunar Y, Mullins ME, Kwong K, et al. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis? A pilot comparison of arterial spin-labeled, dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MRI, and FDG-PET imaging. Academic radiology, 2010, 17(3): 282-290.
[8]
Matsusue E, Fink JR, Rockhill JK, et al. Distinction between glioma progression and post-radiation change by combined physiologic MR imaging. Neuroradiology, 2010, 52(4): 297-306.
[9]
Fink JR, Carr RB, Matsusue E, et al. Comparison of 3.0 Tesla proton MR spectroscopy, MR perfusion and MR diffusion for distinguishing glioma recurrence from posttreatment effects. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI, 2012, 35(1): 56-63.
[10]
Kim YH, Oh SW, Lim YJ, et al. Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas: assessing the efficacy of 18F-FDG PET, 11C-methionine PET and perfusion MRI. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2010, 112(9): 758-765.
[11]
D'Souza MM, Sharma R, Jaimini A, et al. 11C-MET PET/CT and advanced MRI in the evaluation of tumor recurrence in high-grade gliomas. Clinical nuclear medicine, 2014, 39(9): 791-798.
[12]
Barajas RF, Chang JS, Segal MR, et al. Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology, 2009, 253(2): 486-496.
[13]
Hu LS, Baxter LC, Smith KA, et al. Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2009, 30(3): 552-558.
[14]
Aronen HJ, Gazit IE, Louis DN, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology, 1994, 191(1): 41-51.
[15]
Law M, Yang S, Wang H, et al. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2003, 24(10): 1989-1998.
[16]
Xu JL, Shi DP, Dou SW, et al. Distinction between postoperative recurrent glioma and delayed radiation injury using MR perfusion weighted imaging. Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology, 2011, 55(6): 587-594.
[17]
Tran DK, Jensen RL. Treatment-related brain tumor imaging changes: So-called "pseudoprogression" vs. tumor progression: Review and future research opportunities. Surgical neurology international, 2013, 4(Suppl 3): 129-135.
[18]
Babu R, Huang PP, Epstein F, et al. Late radiation necrosis of the brain: case report. Journal of neuro-oncology, 1993, 17(1): 37-42.
[19]
Kim HR, Kim SH, Lee JI, et al. Outcome of radiosurgery for recurrent malignant gliomas: assessment of treatment response using relative cerebral blood volume. Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015, 121(2): 311-318.
[20]
Lupo JM, Cha S, Chang SM, et al. Dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion imaging of high-grade gliomas: characterization of spatial heterogeneity. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2005, 26(6): 1446-1454.
[21]
Cha S, Lupo JM, Chen MH, et al. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2007, 28(6): 1078-1084.
[22]
Sadeghi N, D'Haene N, Decaestecker C, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient and cerebral blood volume in brain gliomas: relation to tumor cell density and tumor microvessel density based on stereotactic biopsies. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2008, 29(3): 476-482.
[23]
Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Tomiguchi S, et al. Posttherapeutic intraaxial brain tumor: the value of perfusion-sensitive contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiating tumor recurrence from nonneoplastic contrast-enhancing tissue. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology, 2000, 21(5): 901-909.
[24]
Seeger A, Braun C, Skardelly M, et al. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease. Academic radiology, 2013, 20(12): 1557-1565.
[25]
Di Costanzo A, Scarabino T, Trojsi F, et al. Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme versus radiation injury: a multiparametric 3.0 T MR approach. La Radiologia medica, 2014, 119(8): 616-624.
[26]
Essig M, Shiroishi MS, Nguyen TB, et al. Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. AJR American journal of roentgenology, 2013, 200(1): 24-34.
[27]
Chamberlain MC, Glantz MJ, Chalmers L, et al. Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. Journal of neuro-oncology, 2007, 82(1): 81-83.
[28]
Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. AJR American journal of roentgenology, 1998, 171(6): 1479-1486.

PREV Solitary fibrous tumor of bladder: a report of one case: imaging and patholog
NEXT Advances of diffusion tensor imaging in fetal brain development
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn