Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]824464
• Technical Article •
Construction of the probability map of the human deep brain nuclei by quantitative susceptibility mapping
BO Bin-shi  ZHAI Guo-qiang  ZHANG Miao  Wang Yi  LI Jian-qi 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.05.010.


[Abstract] Objective: Based on quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) technique, an auto-segment probabilistic atlas for the gray matter nuclei in deep brain was established in the present study.Materials and Methods: The QSM data from 15 healthy subjects were acquired on a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner with a 12 channel matrix head coil. Ten subjects were randomly selected to create a gray matter nuclei atlas of the deep brain, and the remained five subjects were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the atlas. Specifically, the regions of interest (ROI) in six bilateral structures drawn manually by two raters were used as the gold standard, meanwhile, these corresponding ROIs were automatically segmented by three kinds of atlas. To assess the accuracy of proposed segment approach, the probabilistic atlas was compared with both AAL and Johns Hopkins atlas by calculating the Dice coefficient and the susceptibility values in the auto-segment and manual-segment ROIs, respectively.Results: The Dice coefficient in our probability atlas was significantly higher than the AAL in the basal ganglia region and the Johns Hopkins atlas in the skull base and cerebellum, respectively. Moreover, the susceptibility values in our probability atlas were more closer to that of manual segment region compared with the other two atlases.Conclusions: The probability atlas based on the QSM images is more reliable than both AAL and Johns Hopkins atlas in the segment of gray matter nuclei of deep brain. This atlas may be effective to improve the efficiency of image analysis in the clinical research.
[Keywords] Magnetic resonance imaging；Quantitative susceptibility mapping；Atlas-based segmentation；Deep brain nuclei

BO Bin-shi Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

ZHAI Guo-qiang Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

ZHANG Miao Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Wang Yi Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York 10022, U S A

LI Jian-qi* Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance & Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

*Correspondence to: Li JQ, E-mail: jqli@phy.ecnu.edu.cn

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This study was supported by grant from the National Natural Sciences Foundation No. 81271533
Received  2016-12-19
Accepted  2017-04-06
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.05.010
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.05.010.

[1]
Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain: 3-Dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. New York: Georg Thieme Medical Publishers, 1988: 1-122.
[2]
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 2002, 15(1): 273-289.
[3]
de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, et al. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2010, 63(1): 194-206.
[4]
Haacke EM, Liu S, Buch S, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 33(1): 1-25.
[5]
Li W, Wu B, Liu C. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain reflects spatial variation in tissue composition. Neuroimage, 2011, 55(4): 1645-1656.
[6]
Liu C, Li W, Tong K A, et al. Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 42(1): 23-41.
[7]
Liu J, Liu T, de Rochefort L, et al. Morphology enabled dipole inversion for quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural consistency between the magnitude image and the susceptibility map. Neuroimage, 2012, 59(3): 2560-2568.
[8]
Liu T, Khalidov I, de Rochefort L, et al. A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF). NMR Biomed, 2011, 24(9): 1129-1136.
[9]
Shmueli K, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, et al. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of brain tissue in vivo using MRI phase data. Magn Reson Med, 2009, 62(6): 1510-1522.
[10]
Wang Y, Liu T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magn Reson Med, 2015, 73(1): 82-101.
[11]
Du G, Liu T, Lewis MM, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the midbrain in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord, 2016, 31(3): 317-324.
[12]
Murakami Y, Kakeda S, Watanabe K, et al. Usefulness of quantitative susceptibility mapping for the diagnosis of Parkinson disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015, 36(6): 1102-1108.
[13]
Hwang EJ, Kim HG, Kim D, et al. Texture analyses of quantitative susceptibility maps to differentiate Alzheimer's disease from cognitive normal and mild cognitive impairment. Med Physics, 2016, 43(8): 4718-4728.
[14]
Moon Y, Han SH, Moon WJ. Patterns of brain iron accumulation in vascular dementia and Alzheimer's dementia using quantitative susceptibility mapping imaging. J Alzheimers Dis, 2016, 51(3): 737-745.
[15]
Ng AC, Poudel G, Stout JC, et al. Iron accumulation in the basal ganglia in Huntington's disease: cross-sectional data from the IMAGE-HD study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2016, 87(5): 545-549.
[16]
Lim IA, Faria AV, Li X, et al. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures. Neuroimage, 2013, 82(22): 449-469.
[17]
曾东, 张体江, 蒋莉君, 等. 基于3.0 T磁共振高分辨三维像的中国人脑常模. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2010, 27(3): 561-564.
[18]
Tang Y, Hojatkashani C, Dinov ID, et al. The construction of a Chinese MRI brain atlas: a morphometric comparison study between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts. Neuroimage, 2010, 51(1): 33-41.
[19]
Wu M, Rosano C, Lopez-Garcia P, et al. Optimum template selection for atlas-based segmentation. Neuroimage, 2007, 34(4): 1612-1618.
[20]
Liu T, Wisnieff C, Lou M, et al. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Med, 2013, 69(2): 467-476.
[21]
Shattuck DW, Mirza M, Adisetiyo V, et al. Construction of a 3D probabilistic atlas of human cortical structures. Neuroimage, 2008, 39(3): 1064-1080.
[22]
Shattuck DW, Prasad G, Mirza M, et al. Online resource for validation of brain segmentation methods. Neuroimage, 2009, 45(2): 431-439.
[23]
Avants BB, Yushkevich P, Pluta J, et al. The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations. Neuroimage, 2010, 49(3): 2457-2466.
[24]
Zijdenbos AP, Dawant BM, Margolin RA, et al. Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1994, 13(4): 716-724.
[25]
Barbosa JH, Santos AC, Tumas V, et al. Quantifying brain iron deposition in patients with Parkinson's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2*. Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 33(5): 559-565.
[26]
Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, et al. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal, 2008, 12(1): 26-41.
[27]
董芳, 裴孟超, 王前锋, 等. 颅脑梯度回波成像:呼吸伪影和导航回波矫正. 波谱学杂志, 2014, 31(3): 321-330.

PREV Imaging findings of ovarian sertoli-leydig cell tumors：three cases and literature review
NEXT Initial application of fractional motion model in brain of anomalous diffusion
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn