Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]78294
• Clinical Article •
The value of 3D-TOF-MRA for diagnosing rupturd intracranial aneurysm: a Meta analysis
WANG Li-li  LIU Hai-feng  GUO Shun-lin  GUO Ji-gang  ZHANG Hao  LEI Jun-qiang 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.09.001.


[Abstract] Objective: To evaluate the value of three-dimensional time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) for diagnosing ruptured intracranial aneurysm (RIA) by Meta analysis.Materials and Methods: The studies concerning the diagnosis of RIA by 3D-TOF-MRA until December 2016 were searched in the databases such as CNKI, CBM, Wanfang data, VIP, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies by using QUADAS-2 tool. Subsquently, Meta-analysis was performed through Stata 12.0 software. The pooled weighted sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), Positive Likelihood (+LR), Negative Likelihood (-LR) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was drawn.Results: A total of 13 articles consisting 15 studies were included, involving 1004 RIA patients and 1056 suspicious RIA cases. The results of Meta-analysis showed that, the pooled SEN, SPE, +LR, -LR, DOR and AUC of 3D-TOF-MRA for diagnosing RIA were Senmerge=0.94 [95% CI (0.91, 0.97)], Spemerge=0.94 [95% CI (0.87, 0.98)], +LRmerge=9.25[95% CI (5.28, 16.20)], -LRmerge=0.07 [95% CI (0.05, 0.12)], DORmerge=151.90 [95%CI (70.27, 328.37)], AUC=0.98, respectively. Results of subgroup showed 3D-TOF-MRA had better Sen in 3.0 T in comparation with 1.5 T (P<0.05), study type and study standard have no significant differences in RIA diagnosis (P>0.05).Conclusions: 3D-TOF-MRA has definite efficiency for assessing RIA, especially in high field study.
[Keywords] Intracranial aneurysm；Meta-analysis；Magnetic resonance angiography；Literature based discovery

WANG Li-li Radiology Department, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

LIU Hai-feng Radiology Department, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

GUO Shun-lin Radiology Department, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

GUO Ji-gang Radiology Department, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

ZHANG Hao Radiology Department, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

LEI Jun-qiang* Radiology Department, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

*Correspondence to: Lei JQ, E-mail: leijq1990@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2017-01-13
Accepted  2017-08-10
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.09.001
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.09.001.

[1]
Kim T, Lee H, Ahn S, et al. Incidence and risk factors of intracranial aneurysm: a national cohort study in Korea. Int J Stroke, 2016, 11(8):917-927.
[2]
Chua MH, Griessenauer CJ, Stapleton CJ, et al. Documentation of improved outcomes for intracranial aneurysm management over a 15-year interval. Stroke, 2016, 47(3): 708-712.
[3]
Pearl MS, Torok C, Katz Z, et al. Diagnostic quality and accuracy of low dose 3D-DSA protocols in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv surg, 2015, 7(5): 386-390.
[4]
Timsit C, Soize S. Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 37(9): 1684-1689.
[5]
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8): 529-536.
[6]
郑玲，张龙江，路莉,等.三维时间飞跃法MR血管成像检出颅内动脉瘤的研究.临床放射学杂志, 2011, 30(9): 1256-1259.
[7]
孙贞魁，李永东，王武,等. 3D-TOF-MRA对破裂、未破裂脑动脉瘤检出效能的对照研究.中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2015, 21(5): 445-450.
[8]
龙东兵.脑血管影像检查在急诊颅内动脉瘤的临床诊断价值对比研究.长沙:中南大学, 2007.
[9]
乐维婕.自发性蛛网膜下腔出血的影像学相关研究.上海:上海交通大学, 2014.
[10]
顾秀玲，李明华，李永东,等. 3.0 T MR三维时间飞跃法MR血管成像与DSA检出颅内动脉瘤的比较.中华放射学杂志, 2013, 47(1): 49-54.
[11]
Wilcock D, Jaspan T, Holland I, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with conventional angiography in the detection of intracranial aneurysms in patients presenting with subarachnoid haemorrhage. Clin Radiol, 1996, 51(5): 330-334.
[12]
Raaymakers TW, Buys PC, Verbeeten B Jr, et al. MR angiography as a screening tool for intracranial aneurysms: feasibility, test characteristics, and interobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999, 173(6): 1469-1475.
[13]
Pierot L, Portefaix C, Rodriguez-Régent C, et al. Role of MRA in the detection of intracranial aneurysm in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neuroradiol, 2013, 40(3): 204-210.
[14]
Jager HR, Mansmann U, Hausmann O, et al. MRA versus digital subtraction angiography in acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: a blinded multireader study of prospectively recruited patients. Neuroradiology, 2000, 42(5): 313-326.
[15]
Grandin CB, Mathurin P, Duprez T, et al. Diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms: accuracy of MR angiography at 0.5 T. Am J Neuroradiol, 1998, 19(2): 245-252.
[16]
Felber S, Bosch S, Henkes H, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial aneurysms after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Der Radiologe, 1995, 35(11): 822-829.
[17]
Farahmand M, Farahangiz S, Yadollahi M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Acute Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. A Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography. Bull Emerg Trauma, 2013, 1(4): 147-151.
[18]
Chen YC, Sun ZK, Li MH, et al. The clinical value of MRA at 3.0 T for the diagnosis and therapeutic planning of patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage. European radiology, 2012, 22(7): 1404-1412.
[19]
Cornelissen BM, Schneiders JJ, Potters WV, et al. Hemodynamic Differences in Intracranial Aneurysms before and after Rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015, 36(10): 1927-1933.
[20]
Tackmann R, Schuetz G, Hamm B, et al. Quality of the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: STARD (standards for the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies). RoFo, 2010,182(8): 655-659.
[21]
唐小平，余期云，王志强,等. 3.0 T高分辨率磁共振血管壁成像及伪连续式动脉自旋标记技术在单侧烟雾病中的应用.中国医学影像技术, 2016, 32(3): 348-352.

PREV Progress of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI in the kidney
NEXT Comparative study of IVIM and 3D pCASL in the clinical staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn