Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Clinical Article
MRI differential diagnosis of breast adenosis and breast ductal carcinoma with pathological correlation
ZHU Dan  QIAN Hai-shan  HAN Hong-xiu  LIANG Xi-zi  ZHAO Jiang-min 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.10.007.


[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the radiological features of breast adenosis and breast ductal carcinoma by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), DWI and to correlate them to different pathological types.Materials and Methods: 105 cases of breast adenosis and 78 cases of breast ductal carcinoma confirmed by surgical histopathology or biopsy were retrospectively analyzed in the study. All of the patients were examined preoperatively by DWI and DCE-MRI (Vibrant). MRI features of breast adenosis and breast ductal carcinoma with pathological correlation were analyzed. Clinical data, lesion location, size, pattern and enhancement pattern in the groups between different pathological types of breast adenosis and breast ductal carcinoma were evaluated and analyzed by using statistics test by using χ2 test. One-way ANOVA was employed to compare the ADC values.Results: In 105 cases of breast adenosis, DCE MR images showed mass-like lesions (50 patients) and nonmass-like lesions (55 patients), In 78 cases of breast ductal carcinoma, DCE MR images showed mass-like lesions (52 patients) and nonmass-like lesions (26 patients). Most of MLE lesions of adenosis group have morphological rules (37/50, 74%) and clear edge (35/50, 70%). There were statistical significance between MLE lesions of breast adenosis and breast ductal carcinoma in enhancement pattern and TIC pattern (χ2=14.169 and 13.955, respectively, all P<0.01). The ADC values of MLE lesions of breast adenosis and ductal carcinoma were (131.63±21.8) ×10-3 mm2/s, (104.21±18.54) ×10-3 mm2/s, respectively. There were significant differences in the groups (F=52.167, P<0.01). NMLE lesions of breast adenosis and breast ductal carcinoma enhancement patterns were diverse. There were statistical significance between NMLE lesions in pattern and TIC pattern (χ2=and 4.478, respectively, all P<0.05). The ADC values of MLE lesions of breast adenosis and ductal carcinoma were (136.23±14.8) ×10-3 mm2/s, (102.51±16.44) ×10-3 mm2/s, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups (F=49.167, P<0.01).Conclusion: The characteristic of radiological findings can be found in breast adenosis using advanced MR imaging techniques, most of MLE lesions of breast adenosis are benignity-looking lesions, and NMLE lesions of breast adenosis in morphology are similar to malignant lesions, DCE-MRI combined with DWI are helpful in the differential diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma. It shows these suspicious features could be misleading in the MRI interpretation in a group of patients with stromal fibrosis.
[Keywords] Breast diseases;Carcinoma, ductal, breast;Magnetic resonance imaging;Sclerosing adenosis;Diffusion weighted imaging

ZHU Dan Department of Medical Imaging, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China

QIAN Hai-shan Department of Medical Imaging, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China

HAN Hong-xiu Department of Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China

LIANG Xi-zi Department of Pathology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China

ZHAO Jiang-min* Department of Medical Imaging, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 201999, China

*Correspondence to: Zhao JM, E-mail: johnmzhao@sjtu.edu.cn

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This work was part of Science and Technology Commission Research Fund of Baoshan District of Shanghai No.14-E-4
Received  2017-02-12
Accepted  2017-04-19
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.10.007
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.10.007.

[1]
Choi BB, Park KS. Radiologic findings of sclerosing adenosis. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2011, 37(8): 99.
[2]
Baltatzis GE, Voloudakis GE, Arnogiannakis N, et al. Differential diagnosis between sclerosing adenosis and tubular carcinoma of the breast under transmission and scanning electron microscope. Ultrastructural Pathology, 2011, 35(5): 226-229.
[3]
Kundu UR, Guo M, Landon G, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of sclerosing adenosis of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol, 2012, 138(1):96-102.
[4]
Shui R, Yang W. Invasive breast carcinoma arising in microglandular adenosis: a case report and review of the literature. Breast J, 2009,15(6): 653-656.
[5]
Visscher DW, Nassar A, Degnim AC, et al. Sclerosing adenosis and risk of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2014, 144(1):205-212.
[6]
Pina L. Sclerosing adenosis, breast. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008: 1647-1648.
[7]
Reynolds C. Pathology of the breast-human pathology. Human Pathology, 2000, 31(5): 624-625.
[8]
Eby PR, DeMartini WB, Gutierrez RL, et al. Probably benign lesions detected on breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2010, 18(2): 309-321.
[9]
陈忠年.实用外科病理学.上海:上海医科大学出版社, 1997.
[10]
Yamaguchi Y, Hayashi S. Estrogen-related cancer microenvironment of breast carcinoma. Endocr J, 2009, 56(1): 1-7.
[11]
Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, et al. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 193(4): 994-1000.
[12]
Baltzer PAT, Benndorf M, Dietzel M, et al. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(6): 1658-1663.
[13]
李敏,金真,李功杰,等.乳腺动态增强MRI参数与肿瘤血管的相关性及其鉴别诊断价值.磁共振成像, 2010, 1(1): 36-42.
[14]
Siegmann KC, Xydeas T, Sinkus R, et al. Diagnostic value of MR elastography in addition to contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast-initial clinical results. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20(20):318-325.
[15]
Lee SJ, Mahoney MC, Khan S. MRI features of stromal fibrosis of the breast with histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 197(3): 755-762.
[16]
Gity M, Arabkheradmand A, Taheri E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging features of adenosis in the breast. J Breast Cancer, 2015,18(2): 187-194.
[17]
张雨,穆学涛,钟心,等.表观扩散系数与乳腺浸润性导管癌预后因素的相关性分析.磁共振成像, 2015, 6(9): 687-691.
[18]
Chen X, Li W, Zhang Y, et al. Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. BMC cancer, 2010, 10(1): 1.
[19]
徐茂林,苏丹柯,谢东,等.非肿块型强化的乳腺癌磁共振成像表观扩散系数值与HER-2表达的相关性分析.磁共振成像, 2015,6(7): 513-517.

PREV Clinical and CMR manifestations in 4 cases with cardiac amyloidosis of middle-aged and elderly patients
NEXT Evaluation of renal artery with non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for hypertension subjects: A SLEEK sequence comparison with CTA
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn