Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]85496
• Review •
Application status of functional magnetic resonance imaging technology in the liver
MA Wen-ling  GUO Shun-lin  WEI Ke-xiang  SHE Ying-xia 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.11.013.


[Abstract] In recent years, various functional magnetic resonance imaging technologies have been emerging. Some of them have been applied maturely in clinical practice. However, the potential of many technologies has not yet been discovered. At present, functional magnetic resonance imaging has been studied in many parts of the human body, such as brain, breast, kidney, prostate and so on, and some have shown important clinical value. This paper proposed to summary the application status of common functional magnetic resonance imaging technologies in the liver.
[Keywords] Liver；Magnetic resonance imaging, functional；Magnetic resonance spectroscopy；Susceptibility weighted imaging；Arterial spin labeling；Blood oxygenation level dependent；Magnetic resonance elastography

MA Wen-ling The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou Univerity, Lanzhou 730000, China

GUO Shun-lin* Department of Radiology, the First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

WEI Ke-xiang The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou Univerity, Lanzhou 730000, China

SHE Ying-xia The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou Univerity, Lanzhou 730000, China

*Corresponding to: Guo SL, E-mail: guoshunlin@msn.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2017-02-20
Accepted  2017-08-26
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.11.013
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.11.013.

[1]
Patel J, Sigmund EE, Rusinek H, et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010, 31(3): 589-600.
[2]
Hu G, Chan Q, Quan X, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI evaluation for the staging of liver fibrosis in a rat model. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015, 42(2): 331-339.
[3]
Yoon JH, Lee JM, Yu MH, et al. Evaluation of hepatic focal lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived parameters. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 39(2): 276-285.
[4]
Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. Characterizing focal hepatic lesions by free-breathing intravoxel incoherent motion MRI at 3.0 T. Acta Radiologica, 2014, 55(10): 1166-1173.
[5]
Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of focal hepatic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 37(6): 1371-1376.
[6]
Doblas S, Wagner M, Leitao HS, et al. Determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived measurements. Invest Radiol, 2013, 48(10): 722-728.
[7]
李玉博，高雪梅，程敬亮,等.体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像在肝细胞癌术前分级中的应用.中国医学影像技术, 2014, 30(11):1669-1673.
[8]
Woo S, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with enhancement degree and histologic grade. Radiology, 2014, 270(3): 758-767.
[9]
Chiaradia M, Baranes L, Van Nhieu JT, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR imaging of colorectal liver metastases: are we only looking at tumor necrosis? J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 39(2):317-325.
[10]
Andreou A, Koh DM, Collins DJ, et al. Measurement reproducibility of perfusion fraction and pseudodiffusion coefficient derived by intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging in normal liver and metastases. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(2): 428-434.
[11]
Lim AK, Patel N, Eckersley RJ, et al. A comparison of 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy and microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for characterizing hepatitis c-related liver disease. J Viral Hepatitis, 2011, 18(10): e530-e534.
[12]
Cho SG, Kim MY, Kim HJ, et al. Chronic hepatitis: in vivo proton MR spectroscopic evaluation of the liver and correlation with histopathologic findings. Radiology, 2001, 221(3): 740-746.
[13]
赵黎明，宋彬，陈光文,等. 3.0 T 1H-MRS定量评价脂肪肝的价值探讨.中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2010, 17(1): 92-96.
[14]
陈麦林，曾庆玉，许惠敏,等. 3.0 T MR波谱技术在非酒精性脂肪肝中的临床应用.中国医学影像技术, 2009, 25(增刊): 99-101.
[15]
吴坚，叶慧义，孙非,等.肝细胞癌3.0 T MR氢质子波谱的初步研究.中国医学影像技术, 2006, 22(12): 1856-1859.
[16]
张静，刘铁芳，叶慧义,等. 3.0 T质子MRS诊断肝脏肿瘤的应用研究.中国医学影像学, 2008, 16(1): 32-35.
[17]
刘帅，赵卫东，陈鹏,等.肝细胞癌1.5 T 1H-MRS波峰形态特征分析.中国医学影像学, 2011, 19(2): 135-138.
[18]
Bonekamp S, Shen J, Salibi N, et al. Early response of hepatic malignancies to locoregional therapy-value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Comput Assist Tomography, 2011, 35(2): 167-173.
[19]
Chu WC, Lam WW, Lee KH, et al. Phosphorus-31 MR spectroscopy in pediatric liver transplant recipients: a noninvasive assessment of graft status with correlation with liver function tests and liver biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(5): 1624-1629.
[20]
Rossi C, Artunc F, Martirosian P, et al. Histogram analysis of renal arterial spin labeling perfusion data reveals differences between volunteers and patients with mild chronic kidney disease. Invest Radiol, 2012, 47(8): 490-496.
[21]
Schraml C, Schwenzer NF, Martirosian P, et al. Non-invasive pulmonary perfusion assessment in young patients with cystic fibrosis using an arterial spin labeling MR technique at 1.5 T. MAGMA, 2012, 25(2): 155-162.
[22]
张海彬，胡道予，张娟,等. 3.0 T磁共振动脉自旋标记(ASL)技术诊断前列腺癌.放射学实践, 2012, 27(6): 645-651.
[23]
Katada Y, Shukuya T, Kawashima M, et al. A comparative study between arterial spin labeling and CT perfusion methods on hepatic portal venous flow. Japan J Radiol, 2012, 30(10): 863-869.
[24]
李勇，乔飞，孔祥泉,等. 3D-ASL全脑灌注成像在脑肿瘤术前诊断与分级中的应用价值.临床放射学杂志, 2015, 34(6): 871-875.
[25]
Barash H, Gross E, Edrei Y, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging monitoring of pathological changes in rodent livers during hyperoxia and hypercapnia. Hepatology, 2008, 48(4): 1232-1241.
[26]
Park HJ. Feasibility of blood oxygenation level-dependent MRI at 3 T in the characterization of hepatic tumors. Abdom Imaging, 2014,39(1): 142-152.
[27]
Choi JW, Kim H, Kim HC, et al. Blood oxygen level-dependent MRI for evaluation of early response of liver tumors to chemoembolization: an animal study. Anticancer Research, 2013,33(5): 1887-1892.
[28]
Huwart L, Sempoux C, Salameh N, et al. Liver fibrosis: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography versus aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index. Radiology, 2007, 245(2): 458-466.
[29]
邹立秋，阮继银，冯飞,等.磁共振弹性成像与扩散加权成像在肝脏纤维化分期中的对比研究.中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2015,21(2): 176-180.
[30]
Venkatesh SK, Yin M, Glockner JF, et al. MR elastography of liver tumors: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(6):1534-1540.
[31]
Hennedige TP, Leung FP, Teo LL, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance elastography and diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions. Eur Radiology, 2016, 26(2): 398-406.
[32]
Li B, Min J, Liang WR, et al. Use of magnetic resonance elastography for assessing liver functional reserve: a clinical study. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(24): 7522-7528.
[33]
方嘉庆，李恩孝.抗血管生成疗法的新概念:血管结构正常化.现代肿瘤医学, 2009, 17(4): 782-785.
[34]
Tao R, Zhang J, Dai Y, et al. Characterizing hepatocellular carcinoma using multi-breath-hold two-dimensional susceptibility-weighted imaging: comparison to conventional liver MRI. Clin Radiol, 2012,67(12): e91-e97.
[35]
李秋云，肖恩华，李华兵,等.磁敏感成像技术在肝脏局灶性病变的初步应用.中国临床医学影像杂志, 2011, 22(2): 100-104.
[36]
陶冉，张久权，崔进国,等.对比观察SWI与常规T1WI、T2WI、T2*WI显示肝硬化铁沉积结节的价值.中国医学影像技术, 2012,28(5): 957-960.
[37]
云永兴，王立非，陆普选,等.磁敏感加权成像在诊断早期肝癌中的应用.广东医学, 2016, 37(增刊): 147-150.
[38]
陶冉，崔进国，张久权,等.应用磁敏感加权成像评价肝硬化患者肝脏铁沉积及其与血清铁蛋白含量的相关性.中国医学影像学杂志, 2012, 20(5): 328-330, 334.
[39]
Feier D, Balassy C, Bastati N, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative liver MR imaging with diffusion-weighted, SWI, and hepato-specific contrast-enhanced sequences in staging liver fibrosis: a multiparametric approach. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(2): 539-546.
[40]
王淑艳，高桂花，袁振国,等. MR磁敏感加权成像及相位校正的多回波Dixon序列在肝硬化中的诊断价值.泰山医学院学报, 2016,37(7): 724-727.
[41]
Zhang J, Tao R, You Z, et al. Gamna-Gandy bodies of the spleen detected with susceptibility weighted imaging: maybe a new potential non-invasive marker of esophageal varices. PloS One, 2013, 8(1):e55626.

PREV Research progress of intravoxel incoherent motion in tumor
NEXT The recent advance in the assessment of gastric motility by MRI
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn