Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Review
Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging quality control in bone and joint system
LIU Ling-ling  LI Qi  ZHANG Cheng-jun  MENG Yan  LU Zhao  PAN Shi-nong 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.12.016.


[Abstract] Magnetic resonance diagnosis of bone and joint system diseases has been recognized, especially for the joints, can be very clear and accurate display of its anatomical structure, and even with a fixed dissection of specimens comparable. With the MRI in the field of bone and joint diagnosis of a wide range of applications, how to further improve the scanning method to innovation, how to improve its diagnostic criteria has become an important issue of medical staff. In magnetic resonance imaging, there are many factors that affect the image quality, including the subject position, sampling orientation, imaging parameters and sequence setting principles, common artifacts and treatment principles, and so on. The rational control or application of these factors will help to establish a practicable uniform quality control standard for the osteoarticular system, and play a decisive role in the optimization of magnetic resonance technology and the acquisition of high quality images.
[Keywords] Bone and joint system;Magnetic resonance imaging;Quality control

LIU Ling-ling Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

LI Qi Department of Medical Imaging, Liaoning Electric Power Center Hospital, Shenyang 110004, China

ZHANG Cheng-jun Department of Radiology, Chaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang 122000, China

MENG Yan Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

LU Zhao Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

PAN Shi-nong* Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

*Corresponding to: Pan SN, E-mail: cjr.panshinong@vip.163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This work was part of the National Key R & D Plan and Special Research and Development Program of Digital Diagnosis and Treatment Equipment No. 2016YFC0107102
Received  2017-07-30
Accepted  2017-08-31
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.12.016
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2017.12.016.

[1]
ACR. MRI quality control manual. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2004.
[2]
李坤成.中国医用磁共振产业和技术发展现状.磁共振成像, 2011,2(1): 5-6.
[3]
Qiu J, Wang G, Min J, et al. Testing the quality of images for permanent magnet desktop MRI systems using specially designed phantoms. Phys Med Biol, 2013, 58(24): 8677-8687.
[4]
Jung JY, Ha DH, Lee SM, et al. Displaceability of SLAP lesion on shoulder MR arthrography with external rotation position. Skeletal Radiol, 2011, 40(8): 1047-1055.
[5]
龚启勇,宋彬. 3.0 T磁共振临床扫描指南.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2010.
[6]
袁慧书,徐文坚.骨肌系统影像检查指南.北京:清华大学出版社, 2016.
[7]
Herold T, Bachthaler M, Hamer OW, et al. Indirect MR arthrography of the shoulder: use of abduction and external rotation to detect full- and partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Radiology, 2006, 240(1): 152-160.
[8]
Tian CY, Cui GQ, Zheng ZZ, et al. The added value of ABER position for the detection and classification of anteroinferior labroligamentous lesions in MR arthrography of the shoulder. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(4):651-657.
[9]
Waldt S, Bruegel M, Mueller D, et al. Rotator cuff tears: assessment with MR arthrography in 275 patients with arthroscopic correlation. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17(2): 491-498.
[10]
Kirchhoff SM. Isolated direct MR arthrography in ABER position or conventional MR arthrography for identification of partial ruptures of the supraspinatus tendon. Radiology, 2011, 51(1): 6-7.
[11]
Major NM, Browne J, Domzalski T, et al. Evaluation of the glenoid labrum with 3-T MRI: is intraarticular contrast necessary. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 196(5): 1139-1144.
[12]
Amin MF, Youssef AO. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance arthrography of the shoulder in detection and grading of SLAP lesions: comparison with arthroscopic findings. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(9):2343-2347.
[13]
Sutter R, Zubler V, Hoffmann A, et al. Hip MRI: how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2014, 202(1): 160-169.
[14]
Smith TO, Hilton G, Toms AP, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of acetabular labral tears using magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(4):863-874.
[15]
Toomayan GA, Holman WR, Major NM, et al. Sensitivity of MR arthrography in the evaluation of acetabular labral tears. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 186(2): 449-453.
[16]
Robinson P. Conventional 3.0 T MRI and 1.5-T MR arthrography of femoroacetabular impingement. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 199(3):509-515.
[17]
McMahon KL, Cowin G, Galloway G. Magnetic resonance imaging: the underlying principles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2011, 41(11):806-819.
[18]
Reinus WR, Shady KL, Mirowitz SA, et al. MR diagnosis of rotator cuff tears of the shoulder: value of using T2-weighted fatsaturated images. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1995, 164(6): 1451-1453.
[19]
Amemiya S, Aoki S, Ohtomo K. Cranial nerve assessment in cavernous sinus tumors with contrast-enhanced 3D fast-imaging employing steady-state acquisition MR imaging. Neuroradiology, 2009, 51(7): 467-470.
[20]
董宝明,张蕾,孔延亮,等.基于磁共振MERGE序列膝关节软骨厚度的定量研究.实用放射学杂志, 2016, 32(1): 75-79.
[21]
Moriya S, Miki Y, Kanagaki M, et al. 90º-flip-angle three-dimensional double-echo steady-state (3D-DESS) magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: isovoxel cartilage imaging at 3.0 T. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83(8): 1429-1432.
[22]
Chen W, Zhao J, Wen Y, et al. Accuracy of 3.0 T MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging to detect meniscal tears of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(1): 198-204.
[23]
Ludescher B, Martirosian P, Lenk S, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone in the wrist at 3 tesla: initial results. Acta Radiol, 2005, 46(3): 306-309.
[24]
Guggenberger R, Markovic D, Eppenberger P, et al. Assessment of median nerve with MR neurography by using diffusion-tensor imaging: normative and pathologic diffusion values. Radiology, 2012, 265(1): 194-203.
[25]
Lindberg P, Feydy AA, Drape J, et al. Relation between diffusion tensor imaging, electromyography, and grip force control in patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome after surgical release. Chicago: RSNA, 2011: SSK10.
[26]
Naraghi A, da GLL, Menezes R, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve before and after carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol, 2013,42(10): 1403-1412.
[27]
Gatlin CC, Matheny LM, Ho CP, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of articular cartilage lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int, 2015, 36(3): 288-292.
[28]
李琦,王磊,王丰哲,等.踝关节韧带损伤MRI影像特征.中国介入影像与治疗学, 2015, 12(11): 669-672.
[29]
Gondim Teixeira PA, Bravetti M, Hossu G, et al. Protocol optimization of sacroiliac joint MR imaging at 3 Tesla: Impact of coil design and motion resistant sequences on image quality. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2017, 5684(17): 30171-30177.
[30]
Dalto VF, Aaaad RL, Crema MD, et al. MRI assessment of bone marrow oedema in the sacroiliac joints of patients with spondyloarthritis: is the SPAIR T2 w technique comparable to STIR?. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(9): 3669-3676.
[31]
Dietrich TJ, Ulbrich EJ, Zanetti M, et al. PROPELLER technique to improve image quality of MRI of the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 197(6): 1093-1100.
[32]
Nyberg E, Sandhu GS, Jesberger J, et al. Comparison of brain MR images at 1.5 T using BLADE and rectilinear techniques for patients who move during data acquisition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2012,33(1): 77-82.

PREV The application of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer
NEXT Keep going on, remain true to our original aspiration: Promote the development of medical magnetic resonance in China in the new era
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn