Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]112474
• Clinical Article •
Texture analysis of 3D-arterial spin labeling imaging in glioma grading: a pilot study
DENG Dabiao  MAO Jiaji  WANG Wensheng  SHEN Jun  CHENG Lina  LI Songtao  WU Jing 

Cite this article as: Deng DB, Mao JJ, Wang WS, et al. Texture analysis of 3D-arterial spin labeling imaging in glioma grading: a pilot study. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 10(5): 321-326. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2019.05.001.


[Abstract] Objective: To explore the value of texture analysis based on ASL images in evaluating the heterogeneity of glioma and peritumoral edema.Materials and Methods: Eighty-one patients with glioma, confirmed by pathology, were enrolled from January 2016 to June 2018. These patients underwent routine MRI and 3D-ASL preoperative. There were 31 cases of low-grade gliomas and 50 cases of high-grade gliomas. The Max layers of tumor parenchyma and peritumoral edema were delineated on ASL gray scale images as region of interest (ROI) respectively. The histogram and gray level co-occurrence matrix texture analysis were performed using Omni-Kinetics software. Thirty-two texture feature parameters of ASL gray scale images were measured. Compare the differences of texture parameters between high grade and low grade gliomas for tumor parenchyma and peritumoral edema by unpaired student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. ROC curves for statistically significant parameters were used to evaluate their efficacy.Results: Twenty-one texture parameters of tumor parenchyma had significant difference between high and low grade gliomas (P<0.05), while 19 texture parameters of peritumoral edema had significant difference (P<0.05). Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) were plotted , and showed that uniformity and energy of tumor parenchyma of AUC was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.59—0.8), 0.72 (95%CI: 0.59—0.85), the critical value was 0.81, 3.21×10-2, the sensitivity was 48.4%, 61.3%, the specificity was 92.00%, 92.00%, the positive predictive values was 78.9%, 82.6%, and the negative predictive values was 74.2%, 79.3%, respectively. The min intensity of peritumoral edema of AUC was 0.72 (95%CI: 0.60—0.85), the critical value was 30, the sensitivity was 84%, the specificity was 58.14%, the positive predictive value was 53.8%, and the negative predictive value was 86.0%.Conclusions: Texture analysis based on ASL images can provide more quantitative information, which is valuable for evaluating the heterogeneity of tumor parenchyma and peritumoral edema of gliomas.
[Keywords] glioma；texture analysis；magnetic resonance imaging；neoplasm grading

DENG Dabiao Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China

MAO Jiaji* Radiology Department, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 5105120, China

WANG Wensheng Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China

SHEN Jun Radiology Department, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou 5105120, China

CHENG Lina Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China

LI Songtao Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China

WU Jing Department of Medical Imaging, Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou 510510, China

*Correspondence to: Mao JJ, E-mail: maojj5@mail2.sysu.edu.cn

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This work was part of Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province No. B2017113
Received  2018-11-13
Accepted  2019-01-20
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2019.05.001
Cite this article as: Deng DB, Mao JJ, Wang WS, et al. Texture analysis of 3D-arterial spin labeling imaging in glioma grading: a pilot study. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 10(5): 321-326. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2019.05.001.

[1]
丁芳芳，袁涛，全冠民, 等. 脑高级别胶质瘤ASL灌注成像研究进展.国际医学放射学杂志, 2014, 37(4): 328-331.
[2]
吴静，汪文胜，颜刘清, 等. rCBFmax值对胶质瘤术前分级的价值及与MVD表达间关系的初步研究. 磁共振成像, 2018, 9(6): 417-421.
[3]
Cebeci H, Aydin O, Ozturk-Isik E, et al. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling;comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method. Eur J Radiol, 2014, 83 (10): 1914-1919.
[4]
虞芯仪，耿承军，冯银波, 等. 基于常规MRI图像的纹理分析对脑膜瘤术前分级的临床价值. 中华放射学杂志, 2018, 52(5): 356-362.
[5]
Sachdeva J, Kumar V, Gupta I, et al. Segmentation, feature extraction, and multiclass brain tumor classification. J Digit Imaging, 2013, 26(6): 1141-1150.
[6]
杨耀华，樊斌. 基于增强CT扫描成像的灰度共生矩阵纹理分析不同T分期食管鳞状细胞癌. 临床放射学杂志, 2017, 36(9): 1275-1278.
[7]
文令华，陈峰，李建军. MRI纹理分析在胶质瘤中的研究进展. 中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(6): 945-948.
[8]
Chang AK, Kim KH, Kang Y, et al. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b- value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. Radiology, 2011, 261(3): 882-890.
[9]
Gevaert O, Mitchell LA, Achrol AS, et al. Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features. Radiology, 2014, 273(1): 168-174.
[10]
Lee J, Jain R, Khalil K, et al. Texture feature ratios from relative CBV maps of perfusion MRI are associated with patient survival in glioblastoma. Am J Neuroradiol, 2015, 37(1): 37-43.
[11]
Lubner MG, Stabo N, Lubner SJ, et al. CT textural analysis of hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: pre-treatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with pathology and clinical outcomes. Abdomin Imaging, 2015, 40(7): 2331-2337.
[12]
苏春秋，韩秋月，周茂冬, 等. 动态对比增强MRI纹理分析法与磁敏感加权成像联合应用在脑胶质瘤分级中的价值. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(8): 1264-1268.
[13]
Cha J, Kim ST, Kim HJ, et al. Differentiation of tumor progression from pseudoprogression in patients with posttreatment glioblastoma using multiparametric histogram analysis. Am J Neuroradiol, 2014, 35(7): 1309-1317.
[14]
杨忠诚. 增强T1WI直方图分析在鉴别脑高低级别胶质瘤中的价值.临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 751-754.
[15]
刘晓玉，肖道雄，何艳枚, 等. 联合应用DWI及PWI对脑内肿瘤及瘤周水肿的比较研究. 临床放射学杂志, 2017, 36(7): 928-933.
[16]
龚军伟，罗天友，吴少平, 等. 瘤周水肿区扩散张量成像定量参数在胶质瘤分级中的诊断价值. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2018, 26(2): 86-93.

PREV The progress of aquaporin magnetic resonance molecular imaging in tumors
NEXT The diagnostic value of multi b-values diffusion weighted imaging in the genotypes of WHO grade Ⅱ—Ⅲ astrocytomas
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn