Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Clinical Article
Diagnosis and clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in scar pregnancy
HE Hui  GU Han  HE Ling  ZHOU Changwu 

Cite this article as: He H, Gu H, He L, et al. Diagnosis and clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in scar pregnancy. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(3): 207-210. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.03.009.


[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the features and clinical value of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) using 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Materials and Methods: The basic clinical information of 38 patients with CSP diagnosed at the affiliated hospital of Yangzhou university from July 2013 to April 2019 was collected retrospectively. The pelvis of all cases was imaged on a 3.0 T GE 750 W scanner. The characteristics and growth patterns of lesions, the presence or absence of vascular emptying, the length of the gestational sac and scar intersection, the distance from gestational sac to the uterine serosa surface, and relevant treatment options were evaluated.Results: The gestational sac can be characterized by simple cystic and mixed masses on MR images, and the mixed masses had significantly larger maximum diameter, gestational sac volume and length of uterine scar than the simple cystic gestational sacs (P< 0.05). The gestational sac could be divided into exogenous and endogenous according to the growth pattern, exogenous type had more blood supply and shorter distance from the uterine serosa than endogenous gestational sac (P<0.05). All 38 patients with CSP had good prognosis after undergoing related treatment, and the blood HCG returned to normal value within 1-3 months.Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging can comprehensively investigate the characteristics of the lesion and its relationship with surrounding tissues for the patients with CSP, and provide a basis for individualized clinical treatment.
[Keywords] cesarean scar pregnancy;magnetic resonance imaging

HE Hui Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China

GU Han Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China

HE Ling Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China

ZHOU Changwu* Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000, China

*Correspondence to: Zhou CW, E-mail: changwu83@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2019-09-03
Accepted  2019-11-21
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.03.009
Cite this article as: He H, Gu H, He L, et al. Diagnosis and clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in scar pregnancy. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(3): 207-210. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.03.009.

[1]
Ou Yang Z, Yin Q, Xu Y, et al. Heterotopic cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(9): 1533-1573.
[2]
中华医学会妇产科学会分会.剖宫产术后子宫疤痕妊娠诊治专家共识.中华妇产科杂志, 2016, 51(8): 568-572.
[3]
李芳,王翠.剖宫产术后子宫切口瘢痕处妊娠临床分析.河北医药. 2016, 38(16):2498-2500.
[4]
冯利敏,周延,周广金,等. 3.0 T MRI螺旋桨技术在女性盆腔中的应用.中国医学影像学杂志, 2014, 22(2): 91-94.
[5]
Roeder HA, Cramer SF, Leppert PC. A look at uterine wound healing through a histopathological study of uterine scars. Reprod Sci, 2012, 19(5): 463-473.
[6]
Holland MG, Bienstock JK. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 111(2Pt 2): 541-545.
[7]
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(3): 346-353.
[8]
Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2002, 57(8): 537-543.
[9]
Sekiguchi A, Okuda N, Kawabatal, et al. Ultrasound detection of lacunae-like image of a cesarean scar pregnancy in the first trimester. J Nippon Med Sch, 2013, 80(1): 70-73.
[10]
Ueno Y, Kitajima K, Kawakami F, et al. Novel MRI finding for diagnosis of invasive placenta praevia: evalustion of finding for 65 patients using clinical and histopathological correlations. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(4): 881-888.
[11]
Kong D, Dong X, Qi Y. Ultrasongography-guided multidrug stratification intervertional therapy for cesarean scar pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2015, 292(1): 143-148.
[12]
曾红艳,戴常,白洁.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的超声及MRI特征.中国医学影像学杂志, 2015, 23(8): 622-625.
[13]
Ghezzi F, Laganà D, Franchi M, et al. Conservative treatment by chemotherapy and uterine arteries embolization of a cesarean scar pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2002, 103(1): 88-91.
[14]
Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21(3): 220-227.
[15]
韦昕芳,赵华山,姜陵,等.剖宫产切口妊娠患者MRI影像特点及临床结局分析.中国CT和MRI杂志, 2018, 16(5): 110-113.
[16]
黎昕,代海洋,涂建新.妊娠早期完全性葡萄胎的MRI诊断.磁共振成像. 2016, 7(5): 566-582.
[17]
Mutlu I, Mutlu MF, Erdem A, et al. Treatment of Caserean scar pregnancy with single dose methotrexat: case report. Gazi Med J, 2015, 26(3): 119-120.
[18]
黄颢,梁卫民,张娜.子宫动脉栓塞术联合宫腔镜下清宫术治疗剖宫产疤痕妊娠的临床价值探讨.现代诊断与治疗, 2017, 28(2): 312-313.
[19]
陈雪,黄岳,李艳飞.腹腔镜手术治疗早期外生型剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的疗效观察.山西医药杂志, 2016, 45(7): 753-756.

PREV The value-based T2 histogram analysis for differential diagnosis in solid pancreatic lesions
NEXT A research of the default mode network in patients with chronic neck and shoulder pain of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn