Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]104484
• Experience Exchanges •
Differential diagnosis value of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging for suspicious breast cancer
FENG Hao  ZHONG Jianquan  WU Hengping  LIU Yujian  HUANG Yantao  TANG Ling  HUANG Wenjia 

Cite this article as: Feng H, Zhang JQ, Wu HP, et al. Differential diagnosis value of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging for suspicious breast cancer. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(5): 364-366. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.05.009.


[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the value of ADC, eADC and rADC in breast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), combined with MRI plain scan for the diagnosis and differential value of suspected breast cancer.Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients underwent DWI imaging and were enrolled in the BI-RADS grade IV, and confirmed by surgery and pathology. The ADC value, eADC value and rADC value were measured in the lesion area of interest. The t test was used to compare the two groups. The difference between the good and the malignant was statistically significant at P<0.05. At the same time, according to the size of the ADC value, the distribution of benign and malignant statistics was performed, and the surgical pathological results were used as the gold standard for statistical analysis.Results: In the pairwise comparison, the ADC and rADC values of malignant lesions were lower than those of benign lesions, and the eADC value was higher than that of benign lesions, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);The pathological diagnosis was the gold standard, and the critical value of benign and malignant breast lesions was identified by 1.440×10-3 mm2/s. The sensitivity was 85.7%, the specificity was 55.0%, and the accuracy was 70.7%. The ADC value <1.440×10-3 mm2/s in DWI was used as the criterion for malignancy, Kappa=0.712, which was in good agreement with pathological diagnosis.Conclusions: DWI techniques (ADC values, eADC values, and rADC values) are reliable indicators for identifying differential breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging; combined with MRI plain scan is more important for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant BI-RADS classification and grade Ⅳ lesions, and has guiding significance for clinical treatment.
[Keywords] breast neoplasms；magnetic resonance imaging；diagnosis, differential

FENG Hao Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

ZHONG Jianquan* Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

WU Hengping Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

LIU Yujian Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

HUANG Yantao Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

TANG Ling Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

HUANG Wenjia Department of Radiology, First People's Hospital of Zigong, Sichuan Province, Zigong 643000, China

*Corresponding to: Zhong JQ, E-mail: zgyxjys@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  Zigong Health System Research Project No. 2012-7901
Received  2019-01-13
Accepted  2020-03-30
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.05.009
Cite this article as: Feng H, Zhang JQ, Wu HP, et al. Differential diagnosis value of magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging for suspicious breast cancer. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(5): 364-366. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.05.009.

[1]
Eleri LD. Breast cancer. Medicine, 2016, 44(1): 42-46.
[2]
American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS®, Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013.
[3]
Iima M, Kataoka M, Kanao S, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion and quantitative non-Gaussian diffusion MR imaging: evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic value of several markers of malignant and benign breast lesions. Radiology, 2018, 287(2): 432-441.
[4]
Ding JR, Wang DN, Pan JL. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ and infiltrating ductal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther, 2016, 12(2): 744-750.
[5]
Newitt DC, Zhang Z, Gibbs JE, et al. Test-retest repeatability and reproducibility of ADC measures by breast DWI: results from the ACRIN 6698 trial. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 49(6): 1617-1628.
[6]
汪飞，鲍克志，朱娟,等. MRM BI-RADS 3-5类肿块性病变的DCE-MRI及DWI联合应用价值探讨．中国临床医学影像杂志, 2013, 24(9): 617-621.
[7]
Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, Sinha U, et al. In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast:potential for lesion characterization. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 15(6): 693-704.
[8]
马德晶，逯峰，冯艳,等. MR DWI成像在低级别胶质瘤及脑梗死鉴别诊断中的应用．滨州医学院学报, 2014, 37(3): 209-240.
[9]
张晖，王勇．磁共振扩散结合灌注成像技术对可疑恶性乳腺病变的鉴别诊断价值．磁共振成像, 2018, 9(4): 265-269.
[10]
Shi R, Yao Q, Wu L, et al. Breast lesions: diagnosis using diffusion weighted imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T-systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Breast Cancer, 2018, 18(3): e305-e320
[11]
王远梅，陈昌毅，汪卫兵,等. MRI扩散加权成像对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断．放射学实践, 2012, 27(6): 616-619.
[12]
黄小燕，杜红文，张毅力,等．磁共振扩散加权成像诊断乳腺病变的应用价值．实用放射学杂志, 2008, 24(4): 526-530.
[13]
韩贺山，汤易，崔宁宁．磁共振弥散加权成像及ADC值在乳腺癌的应用价值．医学影像学杂志, 2019, 29(4): 579-583.
[14]
韩英，何生．人工智能在乳腺影像领域的应用现状．放射学实践, 2019, 7(34): 813-815.
[15]
马晓雯，罗娅红．影像组学在乳腺癌应用中的研究进展．磁共振成像, 2018, 9(8): 637-640.

PREV Multimodal MRI findings and misdiagnosis analysis of adult medulloblastoma
NEXT The clinical application of magnetic resonance DWI-ADC values in diagnosis of sarcopenia on perimenopausal women
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn