Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]118472
• Review •
The research progress of radiomics in ovarian tumors
WEI Mingxiang  BO Genji  GUO Lili 

Cite this article as: Wei MX, Bo GJ, Guo LL. The research progress of radiomics in ovarian tumors. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(5): 386-389. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.05.016.


[Abstract] The ovarian tumor is one of the most common gynecologic tumors with various pathological types and high incidence. Traditional imaging diagnosis is often based on qualitative analysis of medical images and thus lack of objectivity. In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence, radiomics is an emerging method for the research of tumor diseases. This method could extract a large number of quantitative features from magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound medical images, and analyze these features to distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian tumors, to identify the type and stage of ovarian cancer and to forecast the prognosis of ovarian tumors. Therefore, radiomics might provide new clues for further understanding the biological characteristics of ovarian tumors. This article reviewed the concept, research steps, challenges and prospects of radiomics in ovarian tumors.
[Keywords] ovarian tumors；magnetic resonance imaging；tomography, x-ray computed；ultrasonography

WEI Mingxiang Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Huaian the First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223300, China

BO Genji* Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Huaian the First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223300, China

GUO Lili Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Huaian the First People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, Huaian 223300, China

*Corresponding to: Bo GJ, E-mail: hybgj0451@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  Foundation of Huai'an Municipal 533 Talents Project No. Huai'an science and Technology Bureau 2012-15
Received  2019-10-31
Accepted  2020-03-22
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.05.016
Cite this article as: Wei MX, Bo GJ, Guo LL. The research progress of radiomics in ovarian tumors. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(5): 386-389. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.05.016.

[1]
谢幸，孔北华，段涛．妇产科学(第9版).北京:人民卫生出版社, 2019: 314-314.
[2]
Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, et al. WHO Classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Lyon: IARC, 2014.
[3]
Morgan RJ, Armstrong DK, Alvarez RD, et al. Ovarian cancer, version 1. 2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2016, 14(9): 1134-1163.
[4]
Kurman RJ, Shih Ie M. The origin and pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian cancer: a proposed unifying theory. Am J Surg Pathol, 2010, 34(3): 433-443.
[5]
Campbell S. Ovarian cancer: role of ultrasound in preoperative diagnosis and population screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gyn, 2012, 40(3): 245-254.
[6]
Desouza NM, O'neill R, Mcindoe GA, et al. Borderline tumors of the ovary: CT and MRI features and tumor markers in differentiation from stage I disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(3): 999-1003.
[7]
Vargas HA, Barrett T, Sala E. MRI of ovarian masses. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 37(2): 265-281.
[8]
Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging- multivariate analysis. Radiology, 2000, 214(1): 39-46.
[9]
Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, et al. Radiomics: etracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48(4): 441-446.
[10]
Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: iages are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology, 2016, 278(2): 563-577.
[11]
Aerts H. Data science in radiology: a path forward. Clin Cancer Res, 2018, 24(3): 532-534.
[12]
Levy MA, Freymann JB, Kirby JS, et al. Informatics methods to enable sharing of quantitative imaging research data. Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 30(9): 1249-1256.
[13]
Zhang H, Mao YF, Chen XJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in categorizing ovarian masses and predicting clinical outcome: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(7): 3358-3371.
[14]
Lubner MG, Smith AD, Sandrasegaran K, et al. CT Texture analysis: definitions, applications, biologic correlates, and challenges. Radiographics, 2017, 37(5): 1483-1503.
[15]
Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. Ieee Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 1973, SMC3(6): 610-621.
[16]
Thibault G, Fertil B, Navarro C, et al. Texture indexes and gray level size zone matrix application to cell nuclei classification. PatternRecognition Inf Process, 2009, 140-45.
[17]
Carter JS, Koopmeiners JS, Kuehn-Hajder JE, et al. Quantitative multiparametric mri of ovarian cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 38(6): 1501-1509.
[18]
Mimura R, Kato F, Tha KK, et al. Comparison between borderline ovarian tumors and carcinomas using semi-automated histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging: focusing on solid components. Japanese J Radiol, 2016, 34(3): 229-237.
[19]
Wang F, Wang YX, Zhou Y, et al. Comparison between types I and Ⅱ epithelial ovarian cancer using histogram analysis of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion models. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 46(6): 1797-1809.
[20]
Wang F, Wang YX, Zhou Y, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for assessing tumor staging and detection of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer: correlation with p53 and Ki-67 expression. Mol Imag Biol, 2019, 21(4): 731-739.
[21]
Kyriazi S, Collins DJ, Messiou C, et al. Metastatic ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: assessing chemotherapy response with diffusion-weighted mr imaging-value of histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficients. Radiology, 2011, 261(1): 182-192.
[22]
董天发，麦慧，魏慧慧,等．基于常规T2WI灰度共生矩阵纹理参数鉴别诊断卵巢实性肿瘤良恶性．中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(9): 1377-1380.
[23]
Faschingbauer F, Beckmann MW, Goecke TW, et al. Automatic texture-based analysis in ultrasound imaging of ovarian masses. Ultraschall Med, 2013, 34(2): 145-150.
[24]
Aramendía-Vidaurreta V, Cabeza R, Villanueva A, et al. Ultrasound image discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses based on a neural network approach. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2016, 42(3):742-752.
[25]
Vargas HA, Veeraraghavan H, Micco M, et al. A novel representation of inter-site tumour heterogeneity from pre-treatment computed tomography textures classifies ovarian cancers by clinical outcome. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(9): 3991-4001.
[26]
Rizzo S, Botta F, Raimondi S, et al. Radiomics of high-grade serous ovarian cancer: association between quantitative CT features, residual tumour and disease progression within 12 months. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(11): 4849-4859.
[27]
Pathak H, Kulkarni V. Identification of Ovarian mass through ultrasound images using machine learning techniques. New York: Ieee, 2015.
[28]
苏会芳，周国锋，谢传淼,等．放射组学的兴起和研究进展．中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(7): 553-556.
[29]
仇清涛，段敬豪，巩贯忠,等．影像组学可重复性问题研究进展．中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2018, 27(3): 327-330.
[30]
Zhao B, Tan Y, Tsai WY, et al. Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 23428.
[31]
Chen WJ, Giger ML, Bick U. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad Radiol, 2006, 13(1): 63-72.
[32]
Velazquez ER, Aerts H, Gu YH, et al. A semiautomatic CT-based ensemble segmentation of lung tumors: Comparison with oncologists' delineations and with the surgical specimen. Radiother Oncol, 2012, 105(2): 167-173.
[33]
Galavis PE, Hollensen C, Jallow N, et al. Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters. Acta Oncol, 2010, 49(7): 1012-1016.

PREV Progress of blood oxygen level dependent MRI in diabetic kidney disease
NEXT Advances in imaging studies of skeletal muscle microvascular lesions in diabetes mellitus with peripheral artery disease
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn