Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]860118
• Review •
Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technique and its progress
HE Jian  ZHAO Shihua  LU Minjie 

Cite this article as: He J, Zhao SH, Lu MJ. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technique and its progress. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(6): 469-473. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.06.018.


[Abstract] Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT), a new emerged myocardial strain technique based on conventional MRI cine sequences, takes advantages in easy post-processing, high spatial resolution images and no demand for additional special sequences. Hence, it is widely used in atrial and ventricular myocardial strain measurement, playing a guiding role in the diagnosis and prognosis of variable cardiovascular diseases. This review aimed to summarize the principles and clinical application of CMR-FT and its up-to-date progress.
[Keywords] cardiac magnetic resonance；feature tracking；cardiovascular disease

HE Jian Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China

ZHAO Shihua Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China

LU Minjie* Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China

*Corresponding to: Lu MJ, E-mail: coolkan@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This work was part of National Natural Science Foundation of China No.81971588, 81771811 National Foreign Expert Talent Project No. G20190001630 Capital Clinically Characteristic Applied Research Fund No.Z191100006619021 Education Reform Project of Peking Union Medical College No.10023201900204 Clinical and Translational Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences No.2019XK320063
Received  2019-12-23
Accepted  2020-03-16
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.06.018
Cite this article as: He J, Zhao SH, Lu MJ. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking technique and its progress. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(6): 469-473. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.06.018.

[1]
Scatteia A, Baritussio A, Bucciarelli-Ducci C. Strain imaging using cardiac magnetic resonance. Heart Fail Rev, 2017, 22(4): 465-476.
[2]
Schuster A, Morton G, Hussain ST. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(2): 296-301.
[3]
Barron JL, Fleet DJ, Beauchemin SS. Performance of optical flow techniques. Intern J Comput Vision, 1994, 12(1): 43-77.
[4]
Amzulescu MS, De Craene M, Langet H. Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 20(6): 605-619.
[5]
Claus P, Omar AMS, Pedrizzetti G. Tissue tracking technology for assessing cardiac mechanics: Principles, normal values, and clinical applications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 8(12): 1444-1460.
[6]
van Everdingen WM, Zweerink A, Nijveldt R. Comparison of strain imaging techniques in CRT candidates: CMR tagging, CMR feature tracking and speckle tracking echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 34(3): 443-456.
[7]
Wu L, Germans T, Guclu A. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014, 16(1): 10.
[8]
Onishi T, Saha SK, Delgado-Montero A. Global longitudinal strain and global circumferential strain by speckle-tracking echocardiography and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2015, 28(5): 587-596.
[9]
王未，张龙江，祁丽．心血管磁共振特征追踪技术的临床研究进展．临床放射学, 2016, 35(8): 1273-1277.
[10]
Kuetting D, Sprinkart AM, Doerner J. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking with harmonic phase imaging analysis (CSPAMM) for assessment of global and regional diastolic function. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(1): 100-107.
[11]
Andre F, Steen H, Matheis P. Age-and gender-related normal left ventricular deformation assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2015, 17(1): 25.
[12]
Augustine D, Lewandowski AJ, Lazdam M. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2013, 15(1): 8.
[13]
Taylor RJ, Moody WE, Umar F. Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: normal values. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 16(8): 871-81.
[14]
Dobrovie M, Barreiro-Perez M, Curione D. Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(12): 6846-6857.
[15]
Liu H, Yang D, Wan K. Distribution pattern of left-ventricular myocardial strain analyzed by a cine MRI based deformation registration algorithm in healthy Chinese volunteers. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 45314.
[16]
Doerner J, Bunck AC, Michels G. Incremental value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking derived atrial and ventricular strain parameters in a comprehensive approach for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 104: 120-128.
[17]
Liu T, Wang C, Li S. Age- and gender-related normal references of right ventricular strain values by tissue tracking cardiac magnetic resonance: results from a Chinese population. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2019, 9(8): 1441-1450.
[18]
Andre F, Robbers-Visser D, Helling-Bakki A. Quantification of myocardial deformation in children by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: determination of reference values for left ventricular strain and strain rate. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2016, 19(1): 8.
[19]
Heermann P, Hedderich DM, Paul M. Biventricular myocardial strain analysis in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014, 16(1): 75.
[20]
Prati G, Vitrella G, Allocca G. Right ventricular strain and dyssynchrony assessment in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: Cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2015, 8(11): S248-S248.
[21]
Kowallick JT, Morton G, Lamata P. Inter-study reproducibility of left ventricular torsion and torsion rate quantification using MR myocardial feature tracking. J Magne Reson Imaging, 2016, 43(1): 128-137.
[22]
Kowallick JT, Kutty S, Edelmann F. Quantification of left atrial strain and strain rate using cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: a feasibility study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014, 16(1): 60.
[23]
Truong VT, Palmer C, Wolking S. Normal left atrial strain and strain rate using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez157.
[24]
Li L, Chen X, Yin G. Early detection of left atrial dysfunction assessed by CMR feature tracking in hypertensive patients. Eur Radiol, 2019, 30(2): 702-711.
[25]
Mordi IR, Singh S, Rudd A. Comprehensive echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation differentiates among heart failure with preserved ejection fraction patients, hypertensive patients, and healthy control subjects. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 11(4): 577- 585.
[26]
Hu BY, Wang J, Yang ZG. Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking for quantifying right ventricular deformation in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 11148.
[27]
Schneeweis C, Qiu J, Schnackenburg B. Value of additional strain analysis with feature tracking in dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detecting coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2014, 16(1): 72.
[28]
Jamal KA. Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking and tagging for the assessment of left ventricular systolic strain in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiov Magn Reson, 2015, 17(Suppl 1): 102.
[29]
Hinojar R, Fernandez-Golfin C, Gonzalez-Gomez A. Prognostic implications of global myocardial mechanics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. Relations to left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 249: 467-472.
[30]
Romano S, Judd RM, Kim RJ. Feature-tracking global longitudinal strain predicts death in a multicenter population of patients with ischemic and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy incremental to ejection fraction and late gadolinium enhancement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 11(10): 1419-1429.
[31]
Sengupta PP, Krishnamoorthy VK, Abhayaratna WP. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2008, 1(1): 29-38.
[32]
Li R, Yang ZG, Xu HY. Myocardial deformation in cardiac amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: Assessed with 3 T cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 3794.
[33]
Baessler B, Schaarschmidt F, Dick A. Diagnostic implications of magnetic resonance feature tracking derived myocardial strain parameters in acute myocarditis. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(1): 218-227.
[34]
Luetkens JA, Schlesinger-Irsch U, Kuetting DL. Feature-tracking myocardial strain analysis in acute myocarditis: diagnostic value and association with myocardial oedema. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(11): 4661- 4671.
[35]
Dick A, Schmidt B, Michels G. Left and right atrial feature tracking in acute myocarditis: A feasibility study. Eur J Radiol, 2017, 89: 72-80.
[36]
Lam CS, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail, 2011, 13(1): 18-28.
[37]
DeVore AD, McNulty S, Alenezi F. Impaired left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from the RELAX trial. Eur J Heart Fail, 2017, 19(7): 893-900.
[38]
Kraigher-Krainer E, Shah AM, Gupta DK. Impaired systolic function by strain imaging in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2014, 63(5): 447-456.
[39]
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: An update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2016, 29(4): 277-314.
[40]
Kutty S, Shang Q, Joseph N. Abnormal right atrial performance in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: A CMR feature tracking analysis. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 248: 136-142.
[41]
Orwat S, Diller GP, Kempny A. Myocardial deformation parameters predict outcome in patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot. Heart, 2016, 102(3): 209-215.
[42]
Jing L, Wehner GJ, Suever JD. Left and right ventricular dyssynchrony and strains from cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking do not predict deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2016, 18(1): 49.
[43]
Latus H, Hachmann P, Gummel K. Impact of residual right ventricular outflow tract obstruction on biventricular strain and synchrony in patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 48(1): 83-90.
[44]
Ishizaki U, Nagao M, Shiina Y. Global strain and dyssynchrony of the single ventricle predict adverse cardiac events after the fontan procedure: Analysis using feature-tracking cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiol, 2019, 73(2): 163-170.

PREV The research progress of amide proton transfer weighted imaging in neurodegenerative disease
NEXT Research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of tumors by magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with chemotherapeutics
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn