Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Technical Article
A comparative study on the effects of 3D mDixon sequence and 3D Vane sequence on liver imaging by combining the Compressed SENSE technology and SENSE
WEI Qiang  WANG Jiazheng  YI Dongna  XU Xiaofang  SONG Qingwei  PU Renwang  CHEN Lihua  ZHANG Yu  LIU Ailian 

Cite this article as: Wei Q, Wang JZ, Yi DN, et al. A comparative study on the effects of 3D mDixon sequence and 3D Vane sequence on liver imaging by combining the Compressed SENSE technology and SENSE. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(9): 781-785. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.09.012.


[Abstract] Objective: To compare the application value of 3D mDixon sequence and 3D Vane sequence of compressed sense technology in liver examination.Materials and Methods: Twenty-three healthy volunteers (13 males and 10 females) were included, who underwent upper abdominal MRI scanning using free breathing 3D Vane, 3D mDixon SENSE and 3D mDixon Compressed SENSE (CS) sequences in the 3.0 T MR scanner. According to the above technologies, they were divided into A, B and C groups. Two observers separately scored the subjective score of liver image quality on a 5-point scale. The regions of interest were placed on the anterior and posterior segments of the right hepatic lobe, the inner and outer segments of the left hepatic lobe, and the right erector spinae. The signal (SI) and standard deviation (SD) values of the liver and erector spinae were measured, and the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. The Wilcoxon test and the Chi-square test were used to analyze the SNR, CNR, and image quality scores of the anterior and posterior segments of the right liver lobe and the inner and outer segments of the left hepatic lobe of the three groups.Results: The objective measurement data and the subjective image quality scores of the images of group A, B and C by the two observers were in good agreement (all Kappa and ICC values were more than 0.75). Image quality scores in three groups were 4.3±0.56, 4.7±0.56, and 4.7±0.56, respectively. The image quality scores in group B and C were significantly higher than those in group A (P<0.05). The SNR and CNR of the anterior and posterior segments of the right hepatic lobe and the inner and outer segments of the left hepatic lobe were 8.03±3.08, 29.25±7.08, 29.25±7.08, 8.03±3.08; 15.75±5.37, 43.89±10.30, 40.27±12.49, 11.37±5.42; 16.95±5.48, 46.55±10.47, 46.56±10.48, 16.95±5.48, respectively. And the SNR and CNR in the anterior and posterior segments of the right hepatic lobe in group B and C were significantly higher than those in group A (P<0.05). SNR and CNR in the left lobe of the liver in group C were also significantly higher than those in group A (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the quality scores, SNR and CNR between groups B and C (P>0.05). The scanning time of 3D Vane is 111 s; Compared with 3D mDixon SENSE sequence, the scanning time of 3D mDixon CS sequence was shortened by about 15.3% (15.1 s vs. 13.1 s).Conclusions: Compared with free-breathing 3D Vane sequences, breath-holding 3D mDixon SENSE and 3D mDixon CS sequences can effectively improve the SNR and contrast noise of images.
[Keywords] 3D mDixon;compressed sense;liver;signal to noise ratio;contrast noise ratio

WEI Qiang Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

WANG Jiazheng Philips Healthy (China), Suzhou 215000, China

YI Dongna Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

XU Xiaofang Philips Healthy (China), Suzhou 215000, China

SONG Qingwei Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

PU Renwang Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

CHEN Lihua Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

ZHANG Yu Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

LIU Ailian* Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

*Correspondence to: Liu AL, E-mail: cjr.liuailian@vip.163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2020-05-06
Accepted  2020-07-18
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.09.012
Cite this article as: Wei Q, Wang JZ, Yi DN, et al. A comparative study on the effects of 3D mDixon sequence and 3D Vane sequence on liver imaging by combining the Compressed SENSE technology and SENSE. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(9): 781-785. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.09.012.

[1]
Ichikawa S, Motosugi U, Kromrey ML, et al. Utility of stack-of-stars acquisition for hepatobiliary phase imaging without breath-holding. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2020, 19(2): 99-107.
[2]
Hersh C, Li F, Block TK, et al. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver using a combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling. Inves Radiol, 2013, 48(1): 10-16.
[3]
Li HH, Zhu H, Yue L, et al. Feasibility of free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of gastric cancer using a golden-angle radial stack-of-stars VIBE sequence: comparison with the conventional contrast-enhanced breath-hold 3D VIBE sequence. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(5): 1891-1899.
[4]
牛智祥. MRI同、反相位成像技术在腹部含脂病变诊断中的应用价值分析.现代医用影像学, 2016, 25(3): 566-567.
[5]
Morani AC, Vicens RA, Wei W, et al. CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and GRAPPA-VIBE for liver MR imaging at 1.5 T: a comparative in vivo patient study. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2015, 39(2): 263-269.
[6]
李武超,王頔,郑念华,等.常规三维容积内插屏气检查序列与自由呼吸StarVIBE序列T1WI肝脏图像质量对比.中国医学影像技术, 2018, 34(7): 1094-1098.
[7]
罗倩,夏幼辰,葛仁斌,等. mDixon技术在成人非酒精性脂肪性肝病临床诊断中的初步应用.国际消化病杂志, 2019, 39(3): 170-174.
[8]
林楚岚,江桂华,陈楚庄,等.基于mDixon方法快速量化非酒精性脂肪肝脂肪含量的研究.中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2015, 36(3): 465-471.
[9]
Le M, Fessler JA. Efficient, Convergent sense MRI reconstruction for nonperiodic boundary conditions via tridiagonal solvers. IEEE Trans Comput Imaging, 2017, 3(1): 11-21.
[10]
李秋云,肖恩华,李华兵,等.敏感性编码技术在肝脏磁敏感成像中应用的参数优选探讨.临床放射学杂志, 2011, 30(9): 1293-1296.
[11]
李爽,陆敏杰,赵世华.压缩感知技术及其在心脏磁共振中的应用进展.磁共振成像, 2018, 9(4): 299-302.
[12]
Niendorf T, Sodickson DK. Highly accelerated cardiovascular MR imaging using many channel technology: concepts and clinical applications. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(1): 87-102.
[13]
Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 58(6): 1182-1195.
[14]
Cho SJ, Choi YJ, Chung SR, et al. High-resolution MRI using compressed sensing-sensitivity encoding (CS-SENSE) for patients with suspected neurovascular compression syndrome: comparison with the conventional SENSE parallel acquisition technique. Clin Radiol, 2019, 74(10): 817.e9-817.e14.
[15]
Donoho DL, Maleki A, Montanari A. Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009, 106(45): 18914-18919.
[16]
王亚魁,金笑,袁慧书.压缩感知三维快速自旋回波序列诊断膝关节软骨损伤.磁共振成像, 2019, 10(5): 352-355.
[17]
张桂珊,肖刚,戴卓智,等.压缩感知技术及其在MR上的应用.磁共振成像, 2013, 4(4): 314-320. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2013.04.016

PREV The clinical value of IVIM-MRI and DWI in evaluating and predicting the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer
NEXT The value of dynamic enhanced MR subtraction in evaluation of tumor activity of hepatocellular carcinoma after interventional surgery
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn