Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Health for all, Prosperity for all
Comparison of the clinical value of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
LI Shaopeng  CHENG Chuandong  DENG Kexue 

Cite this article as: Li SP, Cheng CD, Deng KX. Comparison of the clinical value of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(12): 1167-1169, 1185. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.12.019.


[Abstract] Objective: To study the application value of MRI and CT in the clinical diagnosis of skull base bone invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Materials and Methods: To retrospectively analyze the complete clinical datas of 70 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were pathologically confirmed in our hospital from February 2018 to July 2020. The comprehensive results of the patients’ clinical symptoms, imaging data and follow-up were taken as the skull base bone invasion criteria, then to analysis of the value of CT and MRI in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma skull base bone invasion.Results: Bone invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma skull base on CT is mainly manifested as thickening of cortical bone or hyperplasia and sclerosis, single or multi-site worm-like bone destruction; MRI is mainly manifested as bone marrow high signal displaced by medium signal. Among 70 patients, 24 patients were diagnosed as skull base bone invasion with CT, the detection rate was 34.3%, of which 17 cases were invaded by multiple sites. 51 cases of skull base bone invasion were diagnosed by MRI, of which including 31 cases of multi-site invasion, the detection rate was 72.9%, the detection rate of the two examination methods was statistically different (P<0.05). Both CT and MRI examinations showed a higher incidence of the skull base bone invading the petrosal tip.Conclusions: MRI can significantly improve the detection rate in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with bone invasion of the skull base, which provides imaging basis for clinicians to choose the treatment plan and is worthy of promotion.
[Keywords] nasopharyngeal carcinoma;diagnostic value;magnetic resonance imaging;detection rate;skull base invasion;computed tomography

LI Shaopeng Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230032, China

CHENG Chuandong Department of Neurosurgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230032, China

DENG Kexue* Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230032, China

*Correspondence to: Deng KX, E-mail: dengkexue-anhui@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS  This work was part of Joint Project of Anhui Science and Technology Department No. WK9110000032
Received  2020-08-18
Accepted  2020-11-17
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.12.019
Cite this article as: Li SP, Cheng CD, Deng KX. Comparison of the clinical value of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(12): 1167-1169, 1185. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.12.019.

[1]
Messer JA, Mohamed ASR, Hutcheson KA, et al. Longitudinal characterization of MRI kinetics in irradiated dysphagia-related structures for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2016, 94(4): 919. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.161.
[2]
Zheng D, Yue Q, Ren W, et al. Early responses assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by serial dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 35(1): 125-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.08.011.
[3]
Huang B, Kwong DL, Lai V, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of regional nodal netastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Correlation with nodal staging. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2017(5): 4519653. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4519653.
[4]
Qin Y, Yu X, Hou J, et al. Prognostic value of the pretreatment primary lesion quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for nasoph-aryngeal carcinoma. Acad Radiol, 2019, 26(11): 1473-1482. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.01.021.
[5]
Ni L, Liu Y. Contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T to assess early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncol Lett, 2018, 15(4): 5294-5300. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.7948.
[6]
Ji MF, Huang QH, Yu Xia, et al. Evaluation of plasma epstein-barr virus DNA load to distinguish nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from healthy high-risk populations in Southern China. Cancer, 2014, 120(9): 1353-1360. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28564.
[7]
李伟,张汝森,李雯,等. MRI联合单光子发射计算机体层成像-CT诊断鼻咽癌患者早期颅底骨侵犯的价值及其对临床决策的影响.中华放射学杂志, 2016, 50(6): 406-411. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2016.06.002.
[8]
Cai YL, Li J, Lu AY, et al. Diagnostic significance of combined detection of Epstein-Barr virus antibodies, VCA/IgA, EA/IgA, Rta/IgG and EBNA1/IgA for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(5): 2001-2006. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.5.2001.
[9]
吴莉青,崔春艳,黎浩江,等.基于磁共振成像及调强放疗的鼻咽癌副鼻窦侵犯的预后分析.临床放射学杂志, 2019, 38(5): 806-810. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2019.05.013.
[10]
张相国,梁思贤,潘素明,等.基于MRI的淋巴结包膜侵犯与鼻咽癌3DRT的预后关系.中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 26(6): 621-626. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.iggn.1004-4221.2017.06.003.
[11]
方燕红,陈韵彬,林少俊,等.基于MRI和IMRT的鼻咽癌鼻窦侵犯的预后研究.中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 25(1): 9-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2016.01.003.
[12]
俞岑明,蔡晶,葛琴,等.鼻咽癌海绵窦侵犯调强放疗后放射性颞叶损伤的临床分析.临床肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 21(12): 1099-1102.
[13]
Li YZ, Xie CM, Wu YP, et al. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with retropharyngeal lymph node metastases: A minimum axial diameter of 6 mm is a more accurate prognostic predictor than 5 mm. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2015, 204(1): 20-23. DOI: org/10.1002/cncr.23555.
[14]
Akimoto E, Kadoya T, Kajitani K, et al. Role of~(18)F-PET/CT in predicting prognosis of patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin B reast Cancer, 2018, 18(1): 45. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.09.006.
[15]
Morita T, Tatsumi M, Ishibashi M, et al. Assessment of mediastinal tumors using SUVmax and volumetric parameters on FDG-PET/CT. Asia Oceania J Nuclear Med Biology, 2017, 5(1): 22-29. DOI: 10.22038/aojnmb.2016.7996.
[16]
Park JK, Kim JJ, Moon SW. A study about different findings of PETCT between neoadjuvant and nonneoadjuvant therapy:SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(5): 784-794. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.20.
[17]
Dancheva Z, Bochev P, Chaushev B, et al. Dual-time point 18F DG-PET/CT imaging may be useful in assessing local recurrent disease in high grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Nuclear Med Review Central Eastern Eur, 2016, 19(1): 22. DOI: 10.5603/NMR.2016.0005.
[18]
Albano D, Patti C, Lagalla R, et al. Wholebody MRI, FDG-PET/CT, and bone marrow biopsy, for the assessment of bone marrow involvement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma. J Magne Reson Imaging, 2016, 45(4): 18. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25439.
[19]
Herlemann A, Wenter V, Kretschmer A, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography provides accurate staging of lymph node regions prior to lymph node dissection in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urology, 2016, 70(4): 553-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.051.
[20]
贾芳. CT与MRI检查对鼻咽癌患者局部侵犯情况的诊断价值.医疗装备, 2017, 30(9): 128-129.
[21]
Jia WH, Collins A, Zeng YX, et al. Complex segregation analysis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Guangdong, China: evidence for a multifactorial mode of inheritance(complex segregation analysis of NPC in China). Eur J Human Ge netics, 2016, 13(2): 248-252. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201305.

PREV The value of conventional MRI combined with apparent diffusion coefficient in differential diagnosis of orbital tumors
NEXT Value of contrast enhanced energy spectrum mammography, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI combined with DWI to evaluate different molecular typing of breast cancer
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn