Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]116669
• Clinical Article •
Clinical value of MRI in the diagnosis of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and cystic nephroma
GE Xiaoxue  HAN Tingting  FAN Xiaoxue  YU Bing 

Cite this article as: Ge XX, Han TT, Fan XX, et al. Clinical value of MRI in the diagnosis of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and cystic nephroma[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(4): 30-34. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.04.006.


[Abstract] Objective To analyze the clinical and MRI imaging features of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma (MCRCC) and cystic nephroma (CN) according to Bosniak classification version 2019, and to evaluate the diagnostic value. Materials andMethods MRI images of 24 MCRCC and 16 CN which were confirmed by pathologic examination from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed χ2 test or independent t-test on the two groups of samples, used ROC curve to analyze their image characteristics, and graded the lesions according to Bosniak classification.Results Most cases of MCRCC showed protruding growth pattern and irregular thickening of cyst wall and septum, with thickness averaged (3.87±1.41) mm. Mural nodules were found in 12 cases with diameter averaged (8.47±1.31) mm. Obvious enhancement were found in cortical phase. The thickness of cyst wall and septum in CN lesions were thin and uniform, with the average of (2.17±0.63) mm. Mural nodule was seen in 3 case. We detected significant statistical differences between MCRCC and CN in the age, protruding growth pattern, septal and wall thickness and the sizes of mural nodules (P＜0.05). When the thickness of cyst wall and septum was more than 3.25 mm and the diameter of mural nodules was larger than 3.7 mm, they could be used as the best critical value for the diagnosis of MCRCC.Conclusions MRI is certain value in the diagnosis of MCRCC and CN. Especially the septal and wall thickness and the size of mural nodules are helpful to distinguish between MCRCC and CN.
[Keywords] multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma；cystic nephroma；magnetic resonance imaging；bosniak classification

GE Xiaoxue   HAN Tingting   FAN Xiaoxue   YU Bing*  

Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China

Yu B, E-mail: yubing@sj-hospital.org

Conflicts of interest   None.

This work was part of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871336).
Received  2020-11-20
Accepted  2021-01-27
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.04.006
Cite this article as: Ge XX, Han TT, Fan XX, et al. Clinical value of MRI in the diagnosis of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and cystic nephroma[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(4): 30-34. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.04.006.

1
Tretiakova M, Mehta V, Kocherginsky M, et al. Predominantly cystic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential form a low-grade spectrum[J]. Virchows Arch, 2018, 473(1): 85-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2371-8.
2
Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Eble JN, et al. The international society of urological pathology (ISUP) vancouver classification of renal neoplasia[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2013, 37(10): 1469-1489. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318299f2d1.
3
Zhang L, Guo HX, Gong P, et al. Features of CT imaging and clinicopathological characteristics in multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential and cystic nephroma[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol, 2019, 46(13): 669-672. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2019.13.557.
4
Tse JR, Shen J, Shen L, et al. Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses version 2019: Comparison of categorization using CT and MRI[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2021, 216(2): 412-420. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.23656.
5
Silverman SG, Pedrosa I, Ellis JH, et al. Bosniak classification of cystic renal masses, version 2019: An update proposal and needs assessment[J]. Radiology, 2019, 292(2): 475-488. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182646.
6
Ghosh P, Saha K. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma: a rare, unique entity and diagnostic challenge[J]. Arch Iran Med, 2014, 17(2): 129-132. DOI: 014172/AIM.0010.
7
Sharma A, Andankar M, Pathak H. A rare presentation of cystic nephroma in a young adult[J]. Asian J Urol, 2017, 4(2): 128-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.01.001.
8
Cavildak IK, Cakici MC, Karakoyunlu N, et al. Cystic nephroma: A case report in adult patients[J]. Turk J Urol, 2018, 44(4): 373-376. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.56957.
9
Halat S, Eble JN, Grignon DJ, et al. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma is a subtype of clear cell renal cell carcinoma[J]. Mod Pathol, 2010, 23(7): 931-936. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.78.
10
Von Teichman A, Comperat E, Behnke S, et al. VHL mutations and dysregulation of pVHL-and PTEN-controlled pathways in multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma[J]. Mod Pathol, 2011, 24(4): 571-578. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.222.
11
Phua YL, Ho J. MicroRNAs in the pathogenesis of cystic kidney disease[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2015, 27(2): 219-226. DOI: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000168.
12
Doros LA, Rossi CT, Yang J, et al. DICER1 mutations in childhood cystic nephroma and its relationship to DICER1-renal sarcoma[J]. Mod Pathol, 2014, 27(9): 1267-1280. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.242.
13
Wang J, Wang F, Liu WY, et al. Comparative study of multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma and other complex renal cystic lesions[J]. J Clin Radiol, 2012, 31(7): 979-983. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2012.07.022.
14
Ferreira AM, Reis RB, Kajiwara PP, et al. MRI evaluation of complex renal cysts using the Bosniak classification: a comparison to CT[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2016, 41(10): 2011-2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0797-5.
15
Pitra T, Pivovarcikova K, Tupy R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct diagnostic tool in computed tomography defined Bosniak IIF-III renal cysts: a multicenter study[J]. World J Urol, 2018, 36(6): 905-911. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2176-z.
16
Graumann O, Osther SS, Karstoft J, et al. Bosniak classification system: a prospective comparison of CT, contrast-enhanced US, and MR for categorizing complex renal cystic masses[J]. Acta Radiol, 2016, 57(11): 1409-1417. DOI: 10.1177/0284185115588124.
17
Shaish H, Ahmed F, Schreiber J, et al. Active surveillance of small (< 4 cm) bosniak category 2F, 3, and 4 renal lesions: What happens on imaging follow-up?[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2019, 212(6): 1215-1222. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20758.
18
Imura J, Ichikawa K, Takeda J, et al. Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological, immuno- and lectin histochemical study of nine cases[J]. APMIS, 2004, 112(3): 183-191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm1120304.x.
19
Narayanasamy S, Krishna S, Prasad Shanbhogue AK, et al. Contemporary update on imaging of cystic renal masses with histopathological correlation and emphasis on patient management[J]. Clin Radiol, 2019, 74(2): 83-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.09.003.
20
Zhao JK, Ye ZX, Bai RJ, et al. CT differential diagnosis of cystic nephroma and multilocular cystic renal cell carcmoma [J]. Chin J Oncol, 2015, 37 (11): 845-849. DOI: 10.3760/cma.J.issn.0253-3766.2015.11.01.
21
Ding Y, Tan Q, Mao W, et al. Differentiating between malignant and benign renal tumors: do IVIM and diffusion kurtosis imaging perform better than DWI?[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(12): 6930-6939. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06240-6.
22
Balyemez F, Aslan A, Inan I, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cystic renal masses[J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2017, 11(1-2): E8-E14. DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3888.
23
Kulali F, Kulali SF, Semiz-Oysu A, et al. Role of interface sign and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differential diagnosis of exophytic renal masses[J]. Can Assoc Radiol J, 2019, 70(2): 147-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.10.013.

PREV The performance of pretreatment MRI based nomogram in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A primary study
NEXT Characteristics of endometrial fibrosis on MRI
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn