Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]100594
• Review •
Progress in evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiac magnetic resonance
DENG Qiao  YUE Wenjun  SUN Jiayu 

Cite this article as: Deng Q, Yue WJ, Sun JY. Progress in evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiac magnetic resonance[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(7): 110-113. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.07.026.


[Abstract] Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is a risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events. Assessment of diastolic function is vital in treatment monitoring and prognosis prediction for patient with heart failure. The evaluation methods of DD include: cardiac catheterization, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). CMR possess multiple advantages in the evaluation of diastolic function, such as accurate quantification of global and regional ventricular function, hemodynamic analysis. This article reviews the main methods and research prognosis of DD assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance.
[Keywords] cardiac magnetic resonance imaging；diastolic dysfunction；heart failure with preserved ejection fraction；strain assessment；hemodynamic analysis

DENG Qiao1   YUE Wenjun1   SUN Jiayu2*  

1 Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 637000, China

2 Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

Sun JY, E-mail: sunjiayu@wchscu.cn

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Supported by Key Research and Development Projects in Sichuan Province (No. 2020YFS0123).
Received  2021-02-12
Accepted  2021-03-18
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.07.026
Cite this article as: Deng Q, Yue WJ, Sun JY. Progress in evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiac magnetic resonance[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(7): 110-113. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.07.026.

1
Sengupta PP, Marwick TH. The many dimensions of diastolic function: a curse or a blessing[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 11(3): 409-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.015.
2
Grossman W. Diastolic function and heart failure: an overview[J]. Eur Heart J, 1990, 11(Suppl C): 2-7. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/11.suppl_c.2.
3
Nagueh SF. Classification of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure diagnosis and prognosis[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2018, 31(11): 1209-1211. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2018.09.011.
4
Galderisi M, Cosyns B, Edvardsen T, et al. Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2017, 18(12): 1301-1310. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex244.
5
Kawaji K, Codella NC, Prince MR, et al. Automated segmentation of routine clinical cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009, 2(6): 476-484. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.109.879304.
6
Kinno M, Nagpal P, Horgan S, Waller AH. Comparison of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and computed tomographic imaging for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial function: part 2 (diastolic and regional assessment)[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2017, 19(1): 6. DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0816-3.
7
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the american society of echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 17(12): 1321-1360. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew082.
8
Olsen FJ, Bertelsen L, de Knegt MC, et al. Multimodality cardiac imaging for the assessment of left atrial function and the association with atrial arrhythmias[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 9(10): e004947. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.004947.
9
Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the american society of echocardiography and the european association of cardiovascular imaging[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 17(12): 1321-1360. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew082.
10
Kermer J, Traber J, Utz W, et al. Assessment of diastolic dysfunction: comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2020, 7(5): 2637-2649. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12846.
11
Kim J, Yum B, Palumbo MC, et al. Left atrial strain impairment precedes geometric remodeling as a marker of post-myocardial infarction diastolic dysfunction[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2020, 13(10):2099-2113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.05.041.
12
Schocken DD. Electrocardiographic left ventricular strain pattern: everything old is new again. J Electrocardiol, 2014, 47(5): 595-598. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2014.06.005.
13
Greenstein YY, Mayo PH. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by the intensivist. Chest, 2018, 153(3):723-732. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.032.
14
Ahmed MI, Desai RV, Gaddam KK, et al. Relation of torsion and myocardial strains to LV ejection fraction in hypertension[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 5(3): 273-281. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.11.013.
15
El-SH Ibrahim. Myocardial tagging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: evolution of techniques--pulse sequences, analysis algorithms, and applications[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2011, 13(1): 36. DOI: . DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-13-36.
16
Scatteia A, Baritussio A, Bucciarelli-Ducci C. Strain imaging using cardiac magnetic resonance[J]. Heart Fail Rev, 2017, 22(4): 465-476. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-017-9621-8.
17
Ambale-Venkatesh B, Armstrong AC, Liu CY, et al. Diastolic function assessed from tagged MRI predicts heart failure and atrial fibrillation over an 8-year follow-up period: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 15(4): 442-449. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet189.
18
Nagel E, Stuber M, Burkhard B, et al. Cardiac rotation and relaxation in patients with aortic valve stenosis[J]. Eur Heart J, 2000, 21(7): 582-589. DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1736.
19
Fayad ZA, Ferrari VA, Kraitchman DL, et al. Right ventricular regional function using MR tagging: normals versus chronic pulmonary hypertension[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1998, 39(1): 116-123. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910390118.
20
Schuster A, Hor KN, Kowallick JT, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking: concepts and clinical applications[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 9(4): e004077. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.004077.
21
Kuetting DL, Homsi R, Sprinkart AM, et al. Quantitative assessment of systolic and diastolic function in patients with LGE negative systemic amyloidosis using CMR[J]. Int J Cardiol, 2017, 232: 336-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.054.
22
Ito H, Ishida M, Makino W, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking for characterization of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: correlation of global longitudinal strain with invasive diastolic functional indices[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2020, 22(1): 42. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00636-w.
23
Bucius P, Erley J, Tanacli R, et al. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2020, 7(2): 523-532. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12576.
24
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schunke T, Reiter S, et al. Influence of contrast agent and spatial resolution on myocardial strain results using feature tracking MRI[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(11): 6099-6108. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06971-x.
25
Jung B, Markl M, Föll D, et al. Investigating myocardial motion by MRI using tissue phase mapping[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2006, 29(Suppl 1): S150-S157. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.02.066.
26
Li A, Ruh A, Berhane H, et al. Altered regional myocardial velocities by tissue phase mapping and feature tracking in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2020, 50(2): 168-179. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-019-04549-4.
27
Gimpel C, Jung BA, Jung S, et al. Magnetic resonance tissue phase mapping demonstrates altered left ventricular diastolic function in children with chronic kidney disease[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2017, 47(2): 169-177. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-016-3741-5.
28
Chang MC, Wu MT, Weng KP, et al. Left ventricular regional myocardial motion and twist function in repaired tetralogy of Fallot evaluated by magnetic resonance tissue phase mapping[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(1): 104-114. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4908-7.
29
Dall'Armellina E, Jung BA, Lygate CA, et al. Improved method for quantification of regional cardiac function in mice using phase-contrast MRI[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2012, 67(2): 541-551. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23022.
30
McGinley G, Bendiksen BA, Zhang L, et al. Accelerated magnetic resonance imaging tissue phase mapping of the rat myocardium using compressed sensing with iterative soft-thresholding[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(7): e0218874. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218874.
31
Rathi VK, Doyle M, Yamrozik J, et al. Routine evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a practical approach[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2008, 10(1): 36. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-36.
32
Rumeau P, Acar P, Paranon S, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function in children by Doppler tissue imaging[J]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, 2007, 100(5): 405-410. DOI: 10.4103/apc.APC_75_17
33
Wymer DT, Patel KP, Burke WF, et al. Phase-contrast MRI: physics, techniques, and clinical applications[J]. Radiographics, 2020, 40(1): 122-140. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190039.
34
Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, et al. 4D flow MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 36(5): 1015-1036. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23632.
35
Duarte R, Fernandez G. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by MR: why, how and when[J]. Insights Imaging, 2010, 1(3): 183-192. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-010-0026-7.
36
Kaur H, Assadi H, Alabed S, et al. Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy assessment by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review of the clinical relevance[J]. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 2020, 7(3): 37. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd7030037.
37
Sjöberg P, Heiberg E, Wingren P, et al. Decreased diastolic ventricular kinetic energy in young patients with fontan circulation demonstrated by four-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Pediatr Cardiol, 2017, 38(4): 669-680. DOI: 10.1007/s00246-016-1565-6.
38
Hao J. Measurement of wall shear stress in high speed air flow using shear-sensitive liquid crystal coating[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2018, 18(5): 1605. DOI: 10.3390/s18051605.
39
Rizk J, Latus H, Shehu N, et al. Elevated diastolic wall shear stress in regurgitant semilunar valvular lesions[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 50(3): 763-770. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26680.
40
Su MY, Lin LY, Tseng YH, et al. CMR-verified diffuse myocardial fibrosis is associated with diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2014, 7(10): 991-997. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.04.022.

PREV Research progress of PET/MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque
NEXT Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn