Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]78339
• Original Article •
Homology study of auditory region of superior temporal gyrus between human and macaque based on MRI
CHAI Jingwen  WANG Qianshan  YAO Rong  WANG Yue  LI Binqiang  LI Haifang 

Cite this article as: Chai JW, Wang QS, Yao R, et al. Homology study of auditory region of superior temporal gyrus between human and macaque based on MRI[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(2): 52-56. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.011.


[Abstract] Objective To explore the homology of structural connectivity patterns between the two species and to provide a theoretical basis for cross-species comparisons and alternative experiments, the similarities and differences in the structural connections responsible for auditory information processing in the superior temporal gyrus of humans and macaques were observed using magnetic resonance imaging.Materials and Methods A publicly available brain imaging dataset with 22 human subjects and 9 macaque subjects was selected as the study subjects. For the pre-processed human data, 6 regions of interest with 18 target regions were extracted, and for the macaque data, the STGr and 18 target regions was extracted. Connection strengths were calculated and connection fingerprints were constructed. Similarities and differences in connection patterns were analysed using Manhattan distance and cosine similarity, and the results were finally examined using a permutation test.Results The result shows that the highest similarity values (cosine=0.966) were found in the connectivity fingerprints of the human superior temporal gyrus (area 38 m) and the macaque anterior superior temporal gyrus, and the structural connectivity patterns in the right side of the human superior temporal gyrus (area 38 m) were more similar to those in the macaque anterior superior temporal gyrus. Both regions had strong connections to the perinasal cortex associated with situational memory, the ventral striatum associated with reward, emotion and movement, and the hippocampus associated with memory and learning, and weaker connections to the parietal insula associated with cognition and movement.Conclusions Therefore, the human area 38m has a similar structural connectivity profile to the rostral superior temporal gyrus of macaque. In other words, macaque and human audition processing areas might have a similar precursor. This discovery provides theoretical support for constructing the cross-species comparison framework between human and macaques.
[Keywords] superior temporal gyrus；homology；connectivity；magnetic resonance imaging；human；macaque

CHAI Jingwen   WANG Qianshan   YAO Rong   WANG Yue   LI Binqiang   LI Haifang*  

College of Information and Computer Science, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030000, China

Li HF, E-mail: lihaifang@tyut.edu.cn

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61976150, 61873178); Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (No. 201801D121135).
Received  2021-09-13
Accepted  2022-01-24
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.011
Cite this article as: Chai JW, Wang QS, Yao R, et al. Homology study of auditory region of superior temporal gyrus between human and macaque based on MRI[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(2): 52-56. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.011.

[1]
Scott BH, Mishkin M, Yin P. Neural correlates of auditory short-term memory in rostral superior temporal cortex[J]. Curr Biol, 2014, 24(23): 2767-2775. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.004.
[2]
Joly O, Pallier C, Ramus F, et al. Processing of vocalizations in humans and monkeys: A comparative fMRI study[J]. NeuroImage, 2012, 62(3): 1376-1389. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.070.
[3]
Rauschecker JP. Where did language come from? Precursor mechanisms in nonhuman primates[J]. Curr Opin Behav Sci, 2018, 21(1): 195-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.06.003.
[4]
Yamamoto AK, Parker JO, Hope TMH, et al. A special role for the right posterior superior temporal sulcus during speech production[J]. NeuroImage, 2019, 203: 116184. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116184.
[5]
Nakai T, Koide-Majima N, Nishimoto S. Correspondence of categorical and feature-based representations of music in the human brain[J]. Brain Behav, 2021, 11(1): 1936. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1936.
[6]
Passingham R. How good is the macaque monkey model of the human brain?[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2009, 19(1): 6-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.01.002.
[7]
Rilling JK. Comparative primate neurobiology and the evolution of brain language systems[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2014, 28(5): 10-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.04.002.
[8]
Passingham RE, Stephan KE, Kötter R. The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex[J]. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2002, 3(8): 606-616. DOI: 10.1038/nrn893.
[9]
Beckmann M, Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF. Connectivity-based parcellation of human cingulate cortex and its relation to functional specialization[J]. J Neurosci, 2009, 29(4): 1175-1190. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3328-08.2009.
[10]
Mars RB, Verhagen L, Gladwin TE, et al. Comparing brains by matching connectivity profiles[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2016, 60(5): 90-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.10.008.
[11]
Xia XL, Fan LZ, Cheng C, et al. Interspecies Differences in the Connectivity of Ventral Striatal Components Between Humans and Macaques[J]. Front Neurosci, 2019, 13: 623. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.10.008.
[12]
Wang JJ, Becker B, Wang LJ, et al. Corresponding anatomical and coactivation architecture of the human precuneus showing similar connectivity patterns with macaques[J]. NeuroImage, 2019, 200: 562-574. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.07.001.
[13]
Milham MP, Ai L, Koo B, et al. An Open Resource for Non-human Primate Imaging[J]. Neuron, 2018, 100(1): 61-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.039.
[14]
Croxson PL, Forkel SJ, Cerliani L, et al. Structural Variability Across the Primate Brain: A Cross-Species Comparison[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2018, 28(11): 3829-3841. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx244.
[15]
Fan LZ, Li H, Zhuo JJ, et al. The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2016, 26(8): 3508-3526. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw157.
[16]
Reveley C, Gruslys A, Ye FQ, et al. Three-Dimensional Digital Template Atlas of the Macaque Brain[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2017, 27(9): 4463-4477. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw248.
[17]
Bodin C, Trapeau R, Nazarian B, et al. Functionally homologous representation of vocalizations in the auditory cortex of humans and macaques. Curr Biol, 2021, 31(21): 4839-4844. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.043.
[18]
Dheerendra P, Baumann S, Joly O, et al. The Representation of Time Windows in Primate Auditory Cortex[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2021, 7: bhab434. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab434.
[19]
Li XS, Li XH, Chen SJ, et al. Effect of emotional enhancement of memory on recollection process in young adults: the influence factors and neural mechanisms[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2020, 14(1): 119-129. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-018-9975-0.
[20]
Xia XL, Gao F, Yuan Z. Species and individual differences and connectional asymmetry of Broca's area in humans and macaques[J]. Neuroimage, 2021, 244: 118583. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118583.
[21]
Ren JX, Xu T, Wang DH, et al. Individual Variability in Functional Organization of the Human and Monkey Auditory Cortex[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2021, 31(5): 2450-2465. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa366.

PREV Study on thecerebrum metabolism in PI patients using magnetic resonance spectroscopy
NEXT Application of magnetic nanoparticles in vitro MRI of mouse macrophages
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn