Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]73845
• Review •
Advances in imaging studies of nipple-areola complex involvement
ZHOU Yimo  ZHANG Lina 

Cite this article as: Zhou YM, Zhang LN. Advances in imaging studies of nipple-areola complex involvement[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(2): 152-154, 166. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.038.


[Abstract] Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has become the first choice for the treatment of breast cancer patients or for prophylactic resection of women at high risk of cancer due to its high oncological safety and aesthetic effec. It's the main problem to be solved urgently to preoperative evaluate the involvement of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and to select the proper patients for NSM. The research progress and advantages and disadvantages of using imaging methods to predict the preoperative involvement of NAC in recent years were reviewed in this paper, which provided important information for surgeons to choose subsequent surgical methods.
[Keywords] nipple areola complex；mammography；breast ultrasound；breast magnetic resonance

ZHOU Yimo   ZHANG Lina*  

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China

Zhang LN, E-mail: zhanglnda@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2021-08-17
Accepted  2022-01-30
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.038
Cite this article as: Zhou YM, Zhang LN. Advances in imaging studies of nipple-areola complex involvement[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(2): 152-154, 166. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.02.038.

[1]
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
[2]
Hwang H, Park S, Koo JS, et al. Factors predictive of occult nipple-areolar complex involvement in patients with carcinoma in situ of the breast[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2017, 116(8): 1046-1055. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24768.
[3]
Seki H, Sakurai T, Ishiguro Y, et al. A novel MRI-based predictive index can identify patients suitable for preservation of the nipple-areola complex in breast reconstructive surgery[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2021, 47(2): 225-231. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.010.
[4]
Koh J, Park AY, Ko KH, et al. MRI diagnostic features for predicting nipple-areolar-complex involvement in breast cancer[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2020, 122: 108754. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108754.
[5]
Loewen MJ, Jennings JA, Sherman SR, et al. Mammographic distance as a predictor of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer[J]. Am J Surg, 2008, 195(3): 391-394;discussion394-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.020.
[6]
Schecter AK, Freeman MB, Giri D, et al. Applicability of the nipple-areola complex-sparing mastectomy: a prediction model using mammography to estimate risk of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2006, 56(5): 498-504;discussion504. DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000216946.83252.e4.
[7]
Pirozzi PR, Rossetti C, Carelli I, et al. Clinical and morphological factors predictive of occult involvement of the nipple-areola complex in mastectomy specimens[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 148(2): 177-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.021.
[8]
Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(30): 4948-4954. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8785.
[9]
Lim S, Park G, Choi HJ, et al. Use of preoperative mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI to predict nipple areolar complex involvement in breast cancer[J]. Br J Radiol, 2019, 92(1102): 20190074. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190074.
[10]
D'Alonzo M, Martincich L, Biglia N, et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2012, 48(15): 2311-2318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.017.
[11]
Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009, 114(1): 97-101. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9968-6.
[12]
Crowe JP, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures[J]. Arch Surg, 2004, 139(2): 148-150. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.148.
[13]
Tang W, Yang M, Gao Y, et al. Accuracy of tumour size assessment in the preoperative staging of breast lesions: a comparative study between digital breast tomosynthesis and conventional imaging methods[J]. China Oncol, 2018, 28(11): 813-818. DOI: 10.19401/j.cnki.1007-3639.2018.11.003.
[14]
Qian CH, Gao Y, Wang QF, et al. Study on the ability of preoperative measurement of the size of breast cancer mass by contrast-enhanced digital mammography[J]. Oncoradiology, 2021, 30(3): 155-161. DOI: 10.19732/j.cnki.2096-6210.2021.03.003.
[15]
Sarica O, Zeybek E, Ozturk E. Evaluation of nipple-areola complex with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2010, 34(4): 575-586. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d74a88.
[16]
Hashimoto BE, Morgan GN, Kramer DJ, et al. Systematic approach to difficult problems in breast sonography[J]. Ultrasound Q, 2008, 24(1): 31-38. DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31816b8cdf.
[17]
Dent BL, Miller JA, Eden DJ, et al. Tumor-to-nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 140(1): 1e-8e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003414.
[18]
Byon W, Kim E, Kwon J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and clinicopathological factors for the detection of occult nipple involvement in breast cancer patients[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2014, 17(4): 386-392. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.386.
[19]
Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Hoshi K, et al. Is MRI useful for the prediction of nipple involvement? [J]. Breast Cancer, 2013, 20(4): 316-322. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-012-0338-1.
[20]
Friedman EP, Hall-Craggs MA, Mumtaz H, et al. Breast MR and the appearance of the normal and abnormal nipple[J]. Clin Radiol, 1997, 52(11): 854-861. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80081-5.
[21]
Gao YM, Brachtel EF, Hernandez O, et al. An analysis of nipple enhancement at breast MRI with radiologic-pathologic correlation[J]. Radiographics, 2019, 39(1): 10-27. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180039.
[22]
Balci FL, Kara H, Dulgeroglu O, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with short tumor-nipple distance[J]. Breast J, 2019, 25(4): 612-618. DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13289.
[23]
Faisal M, Fathy H, Gomaa AMM, et al. Breast cancer involvement of the nipple-areola complex and implications for nipple-sparing mastectomies: a retrospective observational study in 137 patients[J]. Patient Saf Surg, 2019, 13: 15. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-019-0191-7.
[24]
Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Carabalona S, et al. MRI and intraoperative pathology to predict nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in patients undergoing NAC-sparing mastectomy[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2015, 51(14): 1882-1889. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.001.
[25]
Seki H, Sakurai T, Mizuno S, et al. A novel nipple-areola complex involvement predictive index for indicating nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients[J]. Breast Cancer, 2019, 26(6): 808-816. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-019-00987-y.
[26]
Mariscotti G, Durando M, Houssami N, et al. Preoperative MRI evaluation of lesion-nipple distance in breast cancer patients: thresholds for predicting occult nipple-areola complex involvement[J]. Clin Radiol, 2018, 73(8): 735-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.03.008.
[27]
Steen ST, Chung AP, Han SH, et al. Predicting nipple-areolar involvement using preoperative breast MRI and primary tumor characteristics[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(2): 633-639. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2641-7.
[28]
D'Alonzo M, Martincich L, Fenoglio A, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: external validation of a three-dimensional automated method to predict nipple occult tumour involvement on preoperative breast MRI[J]. Eur Radiol Exp, 2019, 3(1): 31. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-019-0108-3.
[29]
Zhao K, Ma CZ, Liu J, et al. Clinical application of MRI in evaluation of nipple areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients[J]. J Clin Radiol, 2019, 38(10): 1829-1833. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2019.10.007.
[30]
Cho J, Chung J, Cha ES, et al. Can preoperative 3-T MRI predict nipple-areolar complex involvement in patients with breast cancer? [J]. Clin Imaging, 2016, 40(1): 119-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.08.002.
[31]
Giannini V, Bianchi V, Carabalona S, et al. MRI to predict nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement: an automatic method to compute the 3D distance between the NAC and tumor[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2017, 116(8): 1069-1078. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24788.
[32]
Lerena IC, Boada D, Caparros X, et al. Imaging and clinical predictors for nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in breast cancer patients undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy (NSM)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2020, 138: S118. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(20)30853-4.
[33]
Wu ZY, Kim HJ, Lee J, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer and tumor-to-nipple Distance≤1 cm: a matched cohort study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2021, 28(8): 4284-4291. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09427-0.
[34]
Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(30): 4948-4954. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8785.
[35]
Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, et al. Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 1985, 55(10): 2459-2463. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850515)55:10＜2459:aid-cncr2820551025＞3.0.co;2-l.
[36]
Spear SL, Hannan CM, Willey SC, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009, 123(6): 1665-1673. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0b013e3181a64d94.
[37]
Zhang HW, Li YM, Moran MS, et al. Predictive factors of nipple involvement in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 151(2): 239-249. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3385-4.
[38]
Suehiro S, Inai K, Tokuoka S, et al. Involvement of the nipple in early carcinoma of the breast[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1989, 168(3): 244-248.
[39]
Liu P, Ning LS, Zhang LY. Clinicopathological study of the nipple involvemnt in female primary breast carcinoma[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol, 1994, 21(1): 21-23.
[40]
Piato JRM, de Andrade RDJA, Chala LF, et al. MRI to predict nipple involvement in breast cancer patients[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016, 206(5): 1124-1130. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15187.
[41]
Machida Y, Shimauchi A, Igarashi T, et al. Preoperative breast MRI: reproducibility and significance of findings relevant to nipple-areolar complex involvement[J]. Breast Cancer, 2018, 25(4): 456-463. DOI: 10.1007/s12282-018-0845-9.
[42]
Liu ZS, Lai C, Li Q, et al. Continuous MRI enhancement for prediction of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer[J]. Diagn Imaging Interv Radiol, 2019, 28(6): 422-426. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8001.2019.06.004.
[43]
Razek AAKA, El-Adalany MA, El-Metwally D. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in prediction of nipple-areolar complex invasion by breast cancer[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 69: 45-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.043.
[44]
Huang WL, Li X. Predictive factors of nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer[J]. Chin J Breast Dis Electron Ed, 2020, 14(6): 366-370. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0807.2020.06.008.

PREV Research progress and prospect of DCE-MRI in breast lesions with rim enhancement
NEXT Research progress in predicting microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma by preoperative MRI
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn