Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]121027
• Experience Exchang •
Application of MRI ultrashort echo time and gradient echo sequence in the lungs of preterm infants
SONG Yu  NING Gang  LI Xuesheng  CHEN Xijian  LIAO Yi 

Cite this article as: Song Y, Ning G, Li XS, et al. Application of MRI ultrashort echo time and gradient echo sequence in the lungs of preterm infants[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(6): 102-107. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.06.020.


[Abstract] Objective To explore the feasibility of three-dimensions ultra short echo time (3D UTE) sequence and three-dimensions gradient echo (3D GRE) sequence for magnetic resonance imaging of preterm infants' lungs, and to optimize magnetic resonance sequence scanning parameters.Materials and Methods Prospectively enrolled 95 preterm infants, 50 male infants and 45 female infants who underwent pulmonary MR examinations in our hospital from March to July 2021, aged from 1 day to 1 year and 10 months, and the median age was 5 months. All volunteers performed lung magnetic resonance examinations on the United Imaging 3.0 T pediatric specific magnetic resonance equipment (UIH uMR Alpha). The scanning sequence included 3D UTE and 3D GRE sequences. Each sequence uses different scanning parameters for sequence debugging. According to different scanning parameters, all subjects were randomly divided into five groups in 3D UTE sequence: Group 1 (18 cases), Group 2 (17 cases), Group 3 (19 cases), Group 4 (21 cases) and Group 5 (20 cases). 3D GRE sequence were randomly divided into four groups: Group Ⅰ (24 cases), Group Ⅱ (22 cases), Group Ⅲ (23 cases) and Group Ⅳ (26 cases). Two radiologists evaluated the image quality at different scanning parameters using objective evaluation methods. The objective evaluation indicators include signal noise ratio (SNR) and contrast noise ratio (CNR). Scanning time among different groups were further compared.Results There were statistically significant differences (P＜0.05) in SNR and CNR of lung images at different scanning parameters for the 3D UTE and 3D GRE sequences. In the 3D UTE sequence, the SNR and CNR of Group 1, 2, and 3 were significantly different from those of Group 4 and 5, respectively (P＜0.05), while there was no significant difference in image quality between Group 4 and 5 (P＜0.05). Meanwhile, the scanning time was reduced by 77.95%, 75.55% and 6.67% in Group 4 compared with Group 1, 2, and 3, and 76.06% and 73.45% in Group 5 compared with Groups 1 and 2, respectively. In the 3D GRE sequence, the SNR and CNR of Group Ⅰ and Ⅱ were statistically significant (P＜0.05) compared with those in the Group Ⅲ and Ⅳ, respectively, while no statistically significant differences were seen in the image quality between the Group Ⅲ and Ⅳ (P＞0.05). Meanwhile, the scan time was reduced by 70.80% and 24.24% in Group Ⅲ compared with Group Ⅰ and Ⅱ, respectively, and 40.71% in Group Ⅳ compared with Group Ⅰ, while the image quality was significantly improved.Conclusions 3D UTE and 3D GRE sequences are feasible for MRI of the of preterm infants' lungs. The recommended scanning parameters for 3D UTE sequences are the Group 4 and 5, and the recommended scanning parameters for 3D GRE are the Group Ⅲ and Ⅳ. While ensuring high image quality, it greatly shortens the clinical scan time, and improves the success rate of examinations.
[Keywords] preterm infants；magnetic resonance imaging；three-dimensional ultrashort echo time sequence；three-dimensional gradient echo sequence；image quality

SONG Yu1, 2   NING Gang1, 2   LI Xuesheng1, 2   CHEN Xijian1, 2   LIAO Yi1, 2*  

1 Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

2 Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, China

Liao Y, E-mail: connie0064@126.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2017YFC0109004).
Received  2021-09-18
Accepted  2022-05-18
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.06.020
Cite this article as: Song Y, Ning G, Li XS, et al. Application of MRI ultrashort echo time and gradient echo sequence in the lungs of preterm infants[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(6): 102-107. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.06.020.

[1]
Humberg A, Fortmann I, Siller B, et al. Preterm birth and sustained inflammation: consequences for the neonate[J]. Semin Immunopathol, 2020, 42(4): 451-468. DOI: 10.1007/s00281-020-00803-2.
[2]
Vogel JP, Chawanpaiboon S, Moller AB, et al. The global epidemiology of preterm birth[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaeco, 2018, 52(10): 3-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003.
[3]
Walkup LL, Tkach JA, Higano NS, et al. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Environment[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015, 192(10): 1215-1222. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0552OC.
[4]
Walkup LL, Woods JC. Newer Imaging Techniques for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2015, 42(4): 871-887. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2015.08.012.
[5]
Horn FC, Marshall H, Collier GJ, et al. Regional Ventilation Changes in the Lung: Treatment Response Mapping by Using Hyperpolarized Gas MR Imaging as a Quantitative Biomarker[J]. Radiology, 2017, 284(3): 854-861. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017160532.
[6]
Mendes Pereira L, Wech T, Weng AM, et al. UTE-SENCEFUL: first results for 3D high-resolution lung ventilation imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2019, 81(4): 2464-2473. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27576.
[7]
Aziz M, Krishnam M, Madhuranthakam AJ, et al. Update on MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 35(8): 1483-1497. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01603-y.
[8]
Bae K, Jeon KN, Hwang MJ, et al. Respiratory motion-resolved four-dimensional zero echo time (4D ZTE) lung MRI using retrospective soft gating: feasibility and image quality compared with 3D ZTE[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(9): 5130-5138. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06890-x.
[9]
Zhou YS, Cheng BC, Jia ZY. Current progress in neuroimaging research on postpartum depression[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(7): 593-596. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.07.024.
[10]
Brooke JP, Hall IP. Novel Thoracic MRI Approaches for the Assessment of Pulmonary Physiology and Inflammation[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2021, 1304: 123-145. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68748-9_8.
[11]
Hahn AD, Higano NS, Walkup LL, et al. Pulmonary MRI of neonates in the intensive care unit using 3D ultrashort echo time and a small footprint MRI system[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 45(2): 463-471. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25394.
[12]
Veldhoen S, Heidenreich JF, Metz C, et al. Three-dimensional Ultrashort Echotime. Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Combined Morphologic and Ventilation Imaging in Pediatric Patients With Pulmonary Disease[J]. J Thorac Imaging, 2021, 36(1): 43-51. DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000537.
[13]
Bae K, Jeon KN, Hwang MJ, et al. Comparison of lung imaging using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time and zero echo time sequences: preliminary study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(5): 2253-2262. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5889-x.
[14]
Jiang W, Ong F, Johnson KM, et al. Motion robust high resolution 3D free-breathing pulmonary MRI using dynamic 3D image self-navigator[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2018, 79(6): 2954-2967. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26958.
[15]
Yoder LM, Higano NS, Schapiro AH, et al. Elevated lung volumes in neonates. with bronchopulmonary dysplasia measured via MRI[J]. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2019, 54(8): 1311-1318. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24378.
[16]
Konietzke P, Mueller J, Wuennemann F, et al. The value of chest magnetic. resonance imaging compared to chest radiographs with and without additional lung ultrasound in children with complicated pneumonia[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(3): e0230252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230252.
[17]
Hysinger EB, Bates AJ, Higano NS, et al. Ultrashort Echo-Time MRI for the Assessment of Tracheomalacia in Neonates[J]. Chest, 2020, 157(3): 595-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.11.034.
[18]
Woods JC, Wild JM, Wielpütz MO, et al. Current state of the art MRI for the. longitudinal assessment of cystic fibrosis[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 52(5): 1306-1320. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27030.
[19]
Tibiletti Marta, Paul Jan, Bianchi Andrea, et al. Multistage three-dimensional UTE lung imaging by image-based self-gating[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2016, 75(3): 1324-1332. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25673.
[20]
Su XL, Wan LD, Tang GY. The application of commonly used UTE-MRI techniques in quantitative study of articular cartilage[J]. Int J Med Radiol, 2021, 44(3): 314-318. DOI: 10.19300/j.2021.Z18619.
[21]
Higano NS, Fleck RJ, Spielberg DR, et al. Quantification of neonatal lung. parenchymal density via ultrashort echo time MRI with comparison to CT[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 46(4): 992-1000. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25643.
[22]
Roach DJ, Crémillieux Y, Serai SD, et al. Morphological and quantitative evaluation of emphysema in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A comparative study of MRI with CT[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 44(6): 1656-1663. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25309.
[23]
Metz C, Böckle D, Heidenreich JF, et al. Pulmonary Imaging of Immunocompromised Patients during Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation using Non-Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Ultrashort Echo Time (3D-UTE) MRI[J]. Rofo, 2022, 194(1): 39-48. DOI: 10.1055/a-1535-2341.
[24]
Renz DM, Herrmann KH, Kraemer M, et al. Ultrashort echo time MRI of the lung in children and adolescents: comparison with non-enhanced computed tomography and standard post-contrast T1w MRI sequences. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(3): 1833-1842. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08236-7.
[25]
Hu LB, Gao Z, Peng Q, et al. Feasibility of zero echo time technique in MRI scan for lung diseases and the optimization of parameters based on image quality[J]. Chin J Clin Oncol Rehabil, 2021, 28(2): 144-148. DOI: 10.13455/j.cnki.cjcor.2021.02.04.
[26]
Lauzon ML, Rutt BK. Polar sampling in k-space: reconstruction effects[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1998, 40(5): 769-782. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910400519.
[27]
Browne LP, Malone LJ, Englund EK, et al. Free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging with radial k-space sampling for neonates and infants to reduce anesthesia. Pediatr Radiol, 2022, 16. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-022-05298-7.
[28]
Raptis CA, Ludwig DR, Hammer MM, et al. Building blocks for thoracic MRI: Challenges, sequences, and protocol design[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 50(3): 682-701. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26677.
[29]
Puderbach M, Hintze C, Ley S, et al. MR imaging of the chest: a practical. approach at 1.5T[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 64(3): 345-355. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.009.
[30]
Pennati F, Borzani I, Moroni L, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease With Multivolume Noncontrast MRI and Spirometry. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 53(5): 1570-1580. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27461.

PREV Diffusion tensor imaging of the lumbosacral enlargement helps to estimate the neurologic recovery after decompression surgery in patients with cervical spondylotic myelpoathy
NEXT A comparison of the Kaiser score and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in the assessment of breast lesions
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn