Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]4182
• Original Article •
Quantitative assessment of arterial wall by magnetic resonance 3D DANTE CUBE sequence: An experimental study compared with pathology
ZHAO Haiyan  CHEN Yukun  CHEN Luguang  JIANG Hui  CHEN Shiyue  LI Shuai  PENG Wenjia  LU Jianping 

Cite this article as: Zhao HY, Chen YK, Chen LG, et al. Quantitative assessment of arterial wall by magnetic resonance 3D DANTE CUBE sequence: An experimental study compared with pathology[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(12): 111-116, 123. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.12.019.


[Abstract] Objective To quantitatively evaluate the consistency of arterial wall imaging and pathological results based on DANTE prepulse 3D CUBE magnetic resonance sequence.Materials and Methods Twelve New Zealand white rabbits were fed high-fat diet plus abdominal aortic strain surgery to establish atherosclerosis model, and 8 rabbits were fed ordinary diet as control group. The abdominal aorta was scanned with coronal black-blood DANTE CUBE T1WI and T2WI sequences using 3.0 T MRI system, followed by pathological HE staining. The MRI images were reconstructed in the horizontal axis, and lumen area (LA) and total area (TA) were measured in MRI and pathological images. The wall area (WA) was calculated, WA=TA-LA, and the normalized wall index (NWI) was calculated, NWI=WA/TA. The NWI of T1WI and T2WI are denoted by NWIT1 and NWIT2, respectively. The inner edge and outer edge of the adventitial of the vessel wall were delineated according to the pathological images, and the corresponding NWI were denoted by NWIP1 and NWIP2, respectively. The differences of MR imaging and pathological quantitative indexes between the experimental group and the control group were compared, and the NWI consistency between MRI sequences and between MRI and pathology were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.Results Finally, 19 rabbits (1 died before MRI examination in the experimental group) were included in the statistics. Compared with the control group, the LA of the experimental group was significantly smaller (T1WI, P=0.033; T2WI, P＜0.0001) and NWI were significantly larger (T1WI, P＜0.0001; T2WI, P＜0.0001). The overall consistency analysis showed that the consistency between NWIT1 and NWIT2 was better (ICC=0.7552), followed by the consistency between NWIT1 or NWIT2 and NWIP1 (ICC=0.438; ICC=0.444), NWIT1 or NWIT2 had the worst agreement with NWIP2 (ICC=0.285; ICC=0.292). The consistency analysis of the experimental group was similar to the above results. In the control group, the agreement between NWIT1 and NWIT2 was acceptable (ICC=0.6304), but the agreement between NWIT1 or NWIT2 and NWIP1 was poor (ICC=-0.1917; ICC=-0.05949), the consistency of NWIT1 or NWIT2 with NWIP2 was also poor (ICC=-0.1989; ICC=-0.1441).Conclusions The T1WI and T2WI of 3D DANTE CUBE can quantitatively distinguish the wall of atherosclerotic lesions from the normal wall of abdominal aorta in rabbits, and the consistency between the two commonly used weighted sequences is good. According to the consistency analysis between the NWI and pathology, the NWI measured by DANTE CUBE sequence is relatively close to the measurement results of the inner edge of the adventitia in pathological images, but the consistency is poor in general, especially in the comparison of normal vessels with thin vessel walls.
[Keywords] magnetic resonance imaging；vessel wall；atherosclerosis；rabbit；plaque；black blood imaging；delay alternating with nutation for tailored excitation

ZHAO Haiyan1   CHEN Yukun1   CHEN Luguang1   JIANG Hui2   CHEN Shiyue1   LI Shuai1   PENG Wenjia1*   LU Jianping1  

1 Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China

2 Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of PLA Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China

Peng WJ, E-mail: cindywpj@aliyun.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 22ZR1478100, 20ZR1456300); Medical Innovation Research Special Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (No. 22Y11911200).
Received  2022-08-25
Accepted  2022-11-29
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.12.019
Cite this article as: Zhao HY, Chen YK, Chen LG, et al. Quantitative assessment of arterial wall by magnetic resonance 3D DANTE CUBE sequence: An experimental study compared with pathology[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(12): 111-116, 123. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.12.019.

[1]
Libby P. The changing landscape of atherosclerosis[J]. Nature, 2021, 592(7855): 524-533. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03392-8.
[2]
Chen WW, Gao RL, Liu LS, et al. China cardiovascular diseases report 2015: a summary[J]. J Geriatr Cardiol, 2017, 14(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.01.012.
[3]
Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global epidemiology of stroke and access to acute ischemic stroke interventions[J]. Neurology, 2021, 97(20Suppl 2): S6-S16. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.
[4]
Wang LD, Peng B, Zhang HQ, et al. Brief report on stroke prevention and treatment in China[J]. Chin J Cerebrovasc Dis, 2022, 19(2): 136-144.
[5]
Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022[J]. Int J Stroke, 2022, 17(1): 18-29. DOI: 10.1177/17474930211065917.
[6]
Levy EI, Mocco J, Samuelson RM, et al. Optimal treatment of carotid artery disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51(10): 979-985. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.052.
[7]
Li BM, Miao ZR, Wang YJ, et al. Chinese expert consensus on endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic Stenosis 2018[J]. Chin J Stroke, 2018, 13(6): 594-604. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2018.06.012
[8]
Björkegren JLM, Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis: recent developments[J]. Cell, 2022, 185(10): 1630-1645. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.004.
[9]
Peng WJ, Lu JP. Research progress of muti-contrast high resolution MRI in atherosclerotic vessel wall[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2015, 49(8): 637-640. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2015.08.025.
[10]
Li Y, Bian Y, Liu JG, et al. 1-year efficacy observation of clopidogrel versus aspirin therapy for symptomatic intracranial artery Stenosis based on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Chin J Stroke, 2018, 13(8): 773-779. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2018.08.003.
[11]
Li FB, Wang YL, Hu TX, et al. Application and interpretation of vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging for intracranial atherosclerosis: a narrative review[J/OL]. Ann Transl Med, 2022, 10(12): 714 [2022-08-24]. https://usercontent.beijingbang.top/scholar?q=cache:8UK08DCRYrAJ:scholar.google.com/+Application+and+interpretation+of+vessel+wall+magnetic+resonance+imaging+for+intracranial+atherosclerosis:+a+narrative+review&hl=zh-CN&as_sdt=0,5. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-2364.
[12]
Zhang N, Lyu J, Ren L, et al. Arterial culprit plaque characteristics revealed by magnetic resonance Vessel Wall imaging in patients with single or multiple infarcts[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 84: 12-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.06.004.
[13]
Mandell DM, Mossa-Basha M, Qiao Y, et al. Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017, 38(2): 218-229. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4893.
[14]
Fushimi Y, Yoshida K, Okawa M, et al. Vessel wall MR imaging in neuroradiology[J]. Radiol Med, 2022, 127(9): 1032-1045. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01528-y.
[15]
Mattay RR, Saucedo JF, Lehman VT, et al. Current clinical applications of intracranial vessel wall MR imaging[J]. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2021, 42(5): 463-473. DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2021.07.004.
[16]
Mantzaris MD, Siogkas PK, Tsakanikas VD, et al. Computational modeling of atherosclerotic plaque progression in carotid lesions with moderate degree of stenosis[J]. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2021, 2021: 4209-4212. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630376.
[17]
Guo Y, Canton G, Chen L, et al. Multi-planar, multi-contrast and multi-time point analysis tool (MOCHA) for intracranial vessel wall characterization[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 56(3): 944-955. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28087.
[18]
Wei HY, Zhang MQ, Li YD, et al. Evaluation of 3D multi-contrast carotid vessel wall MRI: a comparative study[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020, 10(1): 269-282. DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.09.11.
[19]
Li XM, Tao L, Cai Y, et al. Scanning parameters optimization of MSDE sequence for intracranial vascular wall imaging[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(7): 112-115, 125.
[20]
Sannananja B, Zhu C, Colip CG, et al. Image-quality assessment of 3D intracranial vessel wall MRI using DANTE or DANTE-CAIPI for blood suppression and imaging acceleration[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2022, 43(6): 837-843. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7531.
[21]
Chen SY, Li S, Peng WJ, et al. Experimental study on repetitive measurement of atherosclerotic vessel wall based on DANTE prepulse 3D CUBE magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Chin J CT MRI, 2021, 19(6): 1-3, 14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2021.06.001.
[22]
Chang L, Chen LG, Peng WJ, et al. Experimental study on repeated scanning of atherosclerotic vessels by black blood 3D DANTE-CUBE magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging[J]. Chin Comput Med Imaging, 2020, 26(2): 176-181. DOI: 10.19627/j.cnki.cn31-1700/th.2020.02.017.
[23]
Qiao Y, Guallar E, Suri FK, et al. MR imaging measures of intracranial atherosclerosis in a population-based study[J]. Radiology, 2016, 280(3): 860-868. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151124.
[24]
Saba L, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, et al. Carotid artery wall imaging: perspective and guidelines from the ASNR vessel wall imaging study group and expert consensus recommendations of the American society of neuroradiology[J/OL]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2018, 39(2): E9-E31 [2022-08-24]. http://www.ajnr.org/content/39/2/E9.short. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5488.
[25]
Altaf N, Daniels L, Morgan PS, et al. Detection of intraplaque hemorrhage by magnetic resonance imaging in symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis predicts recurrent neurological events[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 47(2): 337-342. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.09.064.
[26]
Singh N, Moody AR, Gladstone DJ, et al. Moderate carotid artery stenosis: MR imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage predicts risk of cerebrovascular ischemic events in asymptomatic men[J]. Radiology, 2009, 252(2): 502-508. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2522080792.
[27]
Tandon V, Senthilvelan S, Sreedharan SE, et al. High-resolution MR vessel wall imaging in determining the stroke aetiology and risk stratification in isolated middle cerebral artery disease[J]. Neuroradiology, 2022, 64(8): 1569-1577. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-021-02891-9.
[28]
Wan M, Yan L, Xu Z, et al. Symptomatic and asymptomatic chronic carotid artery occlusion on high-resolution MR vessel wall imaging[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2022, 43(1): 110-116. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7365.
[29]
Zhang XH, Chen X, Liang Z, et al. Atorvastatin promotes macrocalcification, but not microcalcification in atherosclerotic rabbits: an 18F-NaF PET/CT study[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 2021, 78(4): 544-550. DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001088.
[30]
Liu ZL, Gong MF, Zhao BX, et al. How to establish a minimal invasive and stable carotid artery Stenosis rabbit model? A simple and effective carotid artery balloon strain technique[J/OL]. Front Physiol, 2021, 12: 752716 [2022-08-24]. https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/about?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI86yOpY3i-wIVTkYPAh2hoAwvEAEYASAAEgJ1tfD_BwE. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.752716.
[31]
Yang YB, Li ZH, Liu Q, et al. Carotid arterial wall MRI of apolipoprotein e-deficient mouse at 7 T using DANTE-prepared variable-flip-angle rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 86: 1-9 [2022-08-24]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0730725X21001934. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.026.

PREV Application of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient in identifying prognostic risk stratification of prostate cancer
NEXT Study of targeting fibrin polypeptide nanoprobes in enhanced MRI for venous thrombosis
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn