Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]4563
• Technical Article •
Investigating the feasibility of reducing the usage of Gd-DTPA in MRI brain enhancement by improving the quality of acquired image through DL-Recon
LIANG Dan  ZHANG Mo  MA Suwen  LU Jie 

Cite this article as: LIANG D, ZHANG M, MA S W, et al. Investigating the feasibility of reducing the usage of Gd-DTPA in MRI brain enhancement by improving the quality of acquired image through DL-Recon[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 14(11): 136-141. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.11.022.


[Abstract] Objective To investigate the feasibility of reducing the effect of Gd-diethylenetriamine pentametric acid (Gd-DTPA) dose on image quality in MRI brain enhancement by improving the acquired image through deep learning reconstruction (DL-Recon) algorithm.Materials and Methods The patients were divided equally into two groups, the normal dose group and the reduced dose group, and the corresponding T1WI were acquired using conventional reconstruction methods and DL-Recon techniques for the two groups. The region of interest was determined for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) analysis under double-blind conditions by two associate chief, and subjective and objective evaluation of image quality, artefacts, homogeneity and enhancement effects were performed, with the subjective evaluation method based on the LIKERT guideline. The objective evaluation was performed by calculating the SNR of the image background, the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), the subarachnoid space (SAS) and the red nucleus (RN), respectively. The SNR was evaluated for image contrast.Results The image quality obtained using DL-Recon was significantly increased (SNRSFG increased by 48.9%, CNRSFG increased by 91.5%) compared with that of conventional reconstruction method after injection of normal dose, and there was no significant correlation with the injection dose of Gd-DTPA. The artifacts and overall quality scores of DL-Recon were significantly higher than those of conventional images (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the enhancement effect of DL-Recon image + reduced dose group compared with that of conventional reconstruction in the normal injection dose group (P＞0.05).Conclusions MRI DL-Recon algorithm has the ability to reduce the injection amount of Gd-DTPA on the premise of ensuring image quality.
[Keywords] intracranial tumours；Gd-diethylenetriamine pentametric acid；lower dose；deep learning reconstruction gadolinium；magnetic resonance imaging

LIANG Dan1   ZHANG Mo1, 2   MA Suwen1   LU Jie1, 2*  

1 Department of Radiology and Nucler Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China

2 Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing 100053, China

Corresponding author: LU J, E-mail: imaginglu@hotmail.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Huizhi Talent Project-Support Plan-Leading Talent (No. HZ2021ZCLJ005).
Received  2022-10-21
Accepted  2023-09-06
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.11.022
Cite this article as: LIANG D, ZHANG M, MA S W, et al. Investigating the feasibility of reducing the usage of Gd-DTPA in MRI brain enhancement by improving the quality of acquired image through DL-Recon[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 14(11): 136-141. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.11.022.

[1]
SANTOS ARMENTIA E, MARTÍN NOGUEROL T, SUÁREZ VEGA V. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques for tumors of the head and neck[J]. Radiologia, 2019, 61(3): 191-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2018.12.004.
[2]
LEI K, SYED A B, ZHU X C, et al. Artifact- and content-specific quality assessment for MRI with image rulers[J/OL]. Med Image Anal, 2022, 77: 102344 [2022-10-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35091278/. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102344.
[3]
HOELTER P, LANG S, WEIBART M, et al. Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Neuroradiology, 2017, 59(12): 1233-1239. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-017-1922-z.
[4]
NIENDORF H P, HAUSTEIN J, CORNELIUS I, et al. Safety of gadolinium-DTPA: extended clinical experience[J]. Magn Reson Med, 1991, 22(2): 222-228. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910220212.
[5]
NIENDORF H P, DINGER J C, HAUSTEIN J, et al. Tolerance data of Gd-DTPA: a review[J]. Eur J Radiol, 1991, 13(1): 15-20. DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(91)90049-2.
[6]
DISPENZA M, DITTO A. Adverse reactions to contrast media[J/OL]. Drug Allergy Testing, 2018: 239-259 [2022-10-25]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780323485517000225?via%3Dihub. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-48551-7.00022-5
[7]
BEHZADI A H, ZHAO Y Z, FAROOQ Z, et al. Immediate allergic reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Radiology, 2018, 286(2): 731 [2022-10-25]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29356629/. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017174037.
[8]
LIU X D, ZHOU L L, GUO T T, et al. Reported ADR analysis report of gadolinium gluconate injection[J]. Strait Pharm J, 2019, 31(12): 229-231. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3765.2019.12.103.
[9]
EDUPUGANTI V, MARDANI M, VASANAWALA S, et al. Uncertainty quantification in deep MRI reconstruction[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2021, 40(1): 239-250. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2020.3025065.
[10]
MIAO X H, REN L, SHI Y N, et al. Application of intensive nursing intervention in claustrophobia patients undergoing MRI exam[J]. Chin Comput Med Imag, 2018, 24(4): 352-355. DOI: 10.19627/j.cnki.cn31-1700/th.2018.04.017.
[11]
WU S W. Application of standardized nursing in CT and MRI enhanced scanning[J]. China Continuing Med Educ, 2021, 13(10): 182-185. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2021.10.051.
[12]
LEBEL R. Performance characterization of a novel deep learning-based MR image reconstruction pipeline[J/OL]. BMJ Open, 2020 [2022-10-26]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.0655. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2008.06559.
[13]
WANG Z, GUO Q K. The application of person-fit statistics in likert personality scales[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2016, 24(3): 470-474. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2016.03.019.
[14]
ZHAO P F, NIU G M, WANG S Y, et al. Evaluation of glioma benign and malignant based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR texture analysis of different regions of interest[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2020, 11(11): 975-978. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.11.004.
[15]
BAI Z Q, SHI J, SHEN J. Comparative analysis of detection of spinal metastases with contrast-enhanced MRI T1 high resolution isotropic volume excitation and TSE T1WI sequence[J]. Chin J Med Imag Technol, 2017, 33(9): 1397-1400. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.201612105.
[16]
Rahal A. Improved specificity of MRI diagnosis of collagenous lesions in tendon[D]. San Antonio: The University of Texas Health Science Center, 2007.
[17]
GUO Y B, GUO W, QIN Y C, et al. Consistency test based on Kappa coefficient and its software implementation[J]. Chin J Heath Stat, 2016, 33(1): 169-170, 174.
[18]
WANG R P, ZHAO H, LI B. Critical points and standards of randomized controlled clinical trial design[J]. Shanghai Med Pharm J, 2022, 43(7): 72-77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1533.2022.07.019.
[19]
ZHAO L, ZHANG C, TIAN J, et al. The impact of adjusting the scanning sequence on the time and image quality of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Cardiovasc Pulm Dis, 2021, 40(8): 841-845, 862. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5062.2021.08.016.
[20]
PESCHKE E, ULLOA P, JANSEN O, et al. Metallic implants in MRI - hazards and imaging artifacts[J]. Rofo, 2021, 193(11): 1285-1293. DOI: 10.1055/a-1460-8566.
[21]
YANG X J. Functional connectivity analysis of brain networks in patients with paranoid-schizophrenia based on graph measurements and graph filtering[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2021. DOI: 10.27380/d.cnki.gwkju.2021.000501.
[22]
LI Q G, YIN Y Y, ZHAO C, et al. Application of deep learning in intravoxel incoherent motion brain magnetic resonance imaging quality[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2023, 14(5): 16-20. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.05.004.
[23]
YU Y, ZHAO C, QI Z G, et al. Application of deep learning reconstruction in improving the quality of neuromelanin magnetic resonance image[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2023, 14(5): 11-15. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.05.003.
[24]
YANG J, LI Q G, WU T, et al. A comparative study on the enhancement of high resolution coronal image quality by deep learning reconstruction[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2023, 14(5): 21-24, 30. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.05.005.
[25]
HUI J L, JIN S H, YANG Y, et al. Application of standardized breathing training in upper abdominal MRI examination of patients with stage Ⅲ pneumoconiosis[J]. China Heath Stand Manag, 2022, 13(14): 9-13. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2022.14.003.
[26]
LAN B, ZHAO L H, JING Q), et al. Nursing care of two cases of delayed thrombophlebitis caused by gadolinium gluconate injection[J]. West China Med J, 2016, 31(8): 1475-1476. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.201600397.
[27]
WANG W M, ZHANG Z P, CUI X N. Anaphylactic shock caused by gadolinium gluconate injection: a case report[J]. Chin J Pharmacovigil, 2016, 13(7): 445-446. DOI: 10.19803/j.1672-8629.2016.07.018.
[28]
SUN J H, GAO Z H, LIU L H, et al. Anaphylactic shock caused by gadolinium gluconate injection: a case report[J]. Chin J Clin Ration Drug Use, 2015, 8(13): 5, 7. DOI: 10.15887/j.cnki.13-1389/r.2015.13.003.
[29]
ZHOU Q C. Literature analysis of 189 cases of adverse reactions caused by gadolinium dipropionate, a magnetic resonance contrast agent[J]. Anti Infect Pharm, 2016, 13(1): 118-120. DOI: 10.13493/j.issn.1672-7878.2016.01-041.
[30]
CHEN M D, ZHU B O, YIN Y D. Prevention and management of contrast agent allergy in MR enhanced scanning[J]. J Tradit Chin Med Manag, 2018, 26(11): 200-201. DOI: 10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2018.11.197.

PREV Value of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating renal fibrosis in rabbits with renal artery stenosis
NEXT Diagnostic value of diffusion weighted imaging and conventional magnetic resonance imaging on parotid gland tumors
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn