Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]12197
• Technical Article •
Effects of different flip angles and delay times on image quality of liver and biliary system in hepatobiliary phase images of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced magnetic resonance images
REN Xue  ZHAO Ying  ZHOU Liping  ZUO Can  WANG Nan  SONG Qingwei  LIN Liangjie  WANG Jiazheng  LIU Ailian  LIU Yuhui 

Cite this article as: REN X, ZHAO Y, ZHOU L P, et al. Effects of different flip angles and delay times on image quality of liver and biliary system in hepatobiliary phase images of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced magnetic resonance images[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2024, 15(2): 147-154. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.02.022.


[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effects of different flip angles (FA) and delay times on the image quality of liver and biliary system in hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced magnetic resonance images (MRI).Materials and Methods Fifty-seven patients with abdominal discomfort, who had undergone a 3.0 T upper abdominal Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI scan at our hospital, were retrospectively included. HBP imaging was conducted with FA of 10°, 15°, 20°, 25°, and 30°, at delays of 60 minutes and 120 minutes post-contrast agent injection. These combinations of FA and delay time were categorized into 10 groups. Signal intensity (SI) of the liver and common bile duct, SI and standard deviation (SD) of the erector spinae were measured. Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and bile to paravertebral muscle ratio (BMR) were calculated. The visibility of the biliary tract in the images was evaluated using the 5-point method. Intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) and the weighted Kappa test were employed to assess the consistency of the measured data and subjective scores between the two observers. The nonparametric Friedman test was utilized to compare the SNR, CNR, BMR, and subjective scores among images with different combinations of delay time and FA. LSD-t test was used to compare SNR, CNR, BMR and subjective score in each group, and Bonferroni correction was carried out on the results. The optimal combination of FA and delay time was determined based on the statistical results.Results The data and subjective from both observers exhibit strong agreement (ICC values are all>0.75, Kappa values are all>0.75) except the SNRliver for the 120min/FA15°group (ICC=0.75). Across all parameters values at the group of 120-minute delay time are consistently higher than the group of 60-minute delay time. The SNR of the liver in the 120min/FA30° group ecorded the highest value [63.91 (49.44, 77.15)], which was significantly better than 60min/FA10°and 120min/FA10°groups (P<0.05). The CNRliver in the 120min/FA30° group ecorded the highest value [44.21 (31.58, 53.64)], demonstrating a significant difference compared to the 60min/FA10°, 60min/FA15°, 60min/FA30° and 120min/FA10° groups (P<0.05). The SNR of the bile duct in the 120min/FA30° group ecorded the highest value [305.27 (193.97, 377.53)], which was significantly better than 60min/FA10°, 60min/FA15°, 60min/FA20°, 60min/FA25°, 120min/FA10°, and 120min/FA15°groups (P<0.05). The CNRcommon bile duct in the 120min/FA30° group ecorded the highest value [278.66 (180.80, 357.20)] , which was significantly different from the 60min/FA10°, 60min/FA15°, 60min/FA20°, 60min/FA25°, 60min/FA30°, 120min/FA10°, and 120min/FA15°groups (P<0.05). The BMR in the 120min/FA30° group ecorded the highest value[14.75 (11.55, 17.87)], which was significantly different from the 60min/FA10°, 60min/FA15°, 60min/FA20°, 60min/FA25°, 120min/FA10°, and 120min/FA15°groups (P<0.05). According to the subjective scoring results, the visibility of biliary tract at 60min/FA10° was the worst, which was obviously lower than 60min/FA20°, 60min/FA25°, 60min/FA30°, 120min/FA15°, 120min/FA20°, 120min/FA25°, and 120min/FA30°groups (P<0.05).Conclusions By evaluating various combinations of different FA and delay times, it is evident that the 120min/FA30° group exhibits the highest image quality for enhanced liver and biliary tract in HBP of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI. Increasing the FA and extending the delay time notably enhance image quality.
[Keywords] flip angle；delay time；gadobenate dimeglumine；magnetic resonance imaging；hepatobiliary phase；bile

REN Xue1   ZHAO Ying1   ZHOU Liping2   ZUO Can2   WANG Nan1   SONG Qingwei1   LIN Liangjie3   WANG Jiazheng3   LIU Ailian1*   LIU Yuhui2  

1 Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

2 College of Medical Imaging, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116000, China

3 Philips (China) Investment Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200072, China

Corresponding author: LIU A L, E-mail: cjr.liuailian@vip.163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2023-09-13
Accepted  2024-01-08
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.02.022
Cite this article as: REN X, ZHAO Y, ZHOU L P, et al. Effects of different flip angles and delay times on image quality of liver and biliary system in hepatobiliary phase images of Gd-BOPTA-enhanced magnetic resonance images[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2024, 15(2): 147-154. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.02.022.

[1]
ZHENG W J, HUANG H J, SHE D J, et al. Added-value of ancillary imaging features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma on Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI in LI-RADS M[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2022, 47(3): 957-968. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03380-6.
[2]
HUANG J W, LIU Z Y, JIANG C Y, et al. A case of gadobenate dimeglumine-induced anaphylactic shock: a case report[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(6): 7126-7131. DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1076.
[3]
LI L Y, GUO Y Z, CHU L J, et al. The feasibility and clinical value of Gd-BOGTA contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography[J]. Chin Comput Med Imag, 2016, 22(5): 463-467. DOI: 10.19627/j.cnki.cn31-1700/th.2016.05.015.
[4]
ZHANG X J, WANG W S, LIU T F, et al. The effects of three different contrast agents (Gd-BOPTA, Gd-DTPA, and Gd-DOTA) on brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging[J/OL]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(4): 344 [2023-05-22]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7944290/. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-348.
[5]
LIN Z Y, FANG Y, CHEN J, et al. Feasibility and efficacy study of microwave ablation of recurrent small HCC guided by enhanced liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2020, 37(1): 1330-1335. DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1850886.
[6]
CHEN X D, ZHANG Y Y, XIONG M L, et al. Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI evaluation of liver function in patients with cirrhosis[J]. Chin J Med Imag Technol, 2020, 36(1): 96-101. DOI: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2020.01.028.
[7]
VERNUCCIO F, BRUNO A, COSTANZO V, et al. Comparison of the enhancement pattern of hepatic hemangioma on magnetic resonance imaging performed with Gd-EOB-DTPA versus Gd-BOPTA[J]. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 2020, 49(6): 398-403. DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.06.006.
[8]
ZHANG Y, TANG W J, XIE S D, et al. The role of lesion hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI as an additional major imaging feature for HCC classification using LI-RADS v2018 criteria[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(10): 7715-7724. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07807-y.
[9]
MULÉ S, CHALAYE J, LEGOU F, et al. Hepatobiliary MR contrast agent uptake as a predictive biomarker of aggressive features on pathology and reduced recurrence-free survival in resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with dual-tracer 18F-FDG and 18F-FCH PET/CT[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(10): 5348-5357. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06923-5.
[10]
LIU C X, SUN Y, YANG Y, et al. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced biliary imaging from the hepatobiliary phase can predict progression in patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(8): 5840-5850. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07702-6.
[11]
ALWALID O, WANG Y H, FAN W L, et al. Value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and DWI in classification, characterization and confidence in diagnosis of solid focal liver lesions[J]. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2021, 56(1): 72-80. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1847314.
[12]
ZHAO T Q, PAN J J, ZHONG Y, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography and MRCP in evaluating biliary of anatomy on 3T MR scanner[J]. Chin J Med Imag, 2010, 18(4): 359-362. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2010.04.011.
[13]
OKADA M, WAKAYAMA T, YADA N, et al. Optimal flip angle of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis[J]. Abdom Imaging, 2014, 39(4): 694-701. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0096-y.
[14]
IBRAHIM E H, ARPINAR V E, MUFTULER L T, et al. Cardiac functional magnetic resonance imaging at 7T: image quality optimization and ultra-high field capabilities[J]. World J Radiol, 2020, 12(10): 231-246. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v12.i10.231.
[15]
INOUE Y, HATA H, NAKAJIMA A, et al. Quantitative evaluation of display contrast of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images: effects of the flip angle and grayscale gamma value[J/OL]. Radiol Res Pract, 2019, 2019: 7630671 [2023-07-23]. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/rrp/2019/7630671/. DOI: 10.1155/2019/7630671.
[16]
WANG L L. Clinical application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in biliary obstruction[D].Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2021.
[17]
CAI H S, WANG M, ZHAI F Y, et al. Lesion detection at hepatocyte phase on enhanced MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA: comparison of two flip angles[J]. Chin J Med Imag Technol, 2016, 32(1): 129-133. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2016.01.033.
[18]
CUI E M, LONG W S, LI Z Y, et al. The study of increasing flip angle to improve the image contrast on hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA[J]. J Clin Radiol, 2016, 35(12): 1903-1906. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2016.12.035.
[19]
CAI L, CHEN G Y, LÜ Q, et al. Study on the effect of different flip angles on the image quality of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3.0T MRI in biliary tract system imaging[J]. J China Clin Med Imag, 2022, 33(2): 118-121, 126. DOI: 10.12117/jccmi.2022.02.010.
[20]
ODIN C. Repetitive experiments of one or two-pulse sequences in NQR of spins I=3/2: Liouville space, steady-state, Ernst angle and optimum signal[J]. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson, 2017, 85/86: 25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2017.04.004.
[21]
CAI Z Y, WEI Z, WU M, et al. Knee osteochondral junction imaging using a fast 3D T1-weighted ultrashort echo time cones sequence at 3T[J]. Magn Reson Imag, 2020, 73: 76-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.08.003.
[22]
Abdominal Medicine Group of Radiology Branch of Chinese Medical Association. Chinese society of abdominal radiology expert consensus on liver magnetic resonance imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine[J]. Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2017, 23(9): 577-584. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2017.09.001.
[23]
ZENG F X, DAI H, LI X, et al. Preoperative radiomics model using gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting β-catenin mutation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study[J/OL]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 916126 [2023-07-23]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9523364/. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.916126.
[24]
LIU C X, SHEN Z J, MA H, et al. Gd-BOPTA-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging can predict the prognosis of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(5): 3006-3015. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08440-5.
[25]
LI Y M, CHEN J W, WENG S P, et al. Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity on gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging may improve the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J/OL]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(1): 55 [2023-07-24]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7859813/. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.38.
[26]
PASTOR C M, VILGRAIN V. Steatosis alters the activity of hepatocyte membrane transporters in obese rats[J/OL]. Cells, 2021, 10(10): 2733 [2023-07-27]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8534847/. DOI: 10.3390/cells10102733.
[27]
DAIRE J L, LEPORQ B, VILGRAIN V, et al. Liver perfusion modifies Gd-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA hepatocyte concentrations through transfer clearances across sinusoidal membranes[J]. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet, 2017, 42(4): 657-667. DOI: 10.1007/s13318-016-0382-x.
[28]
YANG Q, TANG H H, HUANG Z X, et al. Preliminary study of the optimal delay time for liver MR imaging enhanced with Gd-BOPTA[J]. Radiol Pract, 2012, 27(4): 425-428. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2012.04.020.

PREV Diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic contrast-enhanced cine sequences in STEMI patients with microvascular obstruction
NEXT Application of compressed sensing combined with parallel acqusition technique of breath-holding 3D LAVA FLEX sequence in rapid magnetic resonance imaging of liver
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn