Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]7852
• Clinical Article •
Nomogram for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer using MRI features and quantitative parameters
CHENG Sijia  ZHAI Xiaoyang  ZHOU Shihao  MAO Ke  WEI Hanyu  HAN Dongming 

Cite this article as CHENG S J, ZHAI X Y, ZHOU S H, et al. Nomogram for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer using MRI features and quantitative parameters[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2024, 15(5): 111-118. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.05.018.


[Abstract] Objective To develop a nomogram based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to predict lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in invasive breast cancer.Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 141 patients with invasive breast cancer. Among them, 66 patients from March 2019 to July 2021 were assigned to the training group, and 75 patients from July 2021 to December 2022 were assigned to the validation group. The evaluation included assessment of lesion MRI features (such as mass shape, margins, internal enhancement patterns, and peritumoral edema) and measurement of ADC. The differences in imaging features and mean, maximum, and minimum ADC values within the tumor and peritumoral regions between the LVI-positive and LVI-negative groups were analyzed using chi-square tests, independent sample t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors associated with LVI and to establish a nomogram model for predicting LVI.Results LVI was significantly associated with tumor size, Ki-67 expression, and lymph node metastasis rate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that tumor shape [P=0.014, odds ratio (OR): 0.142 (0.030-0.679)], internal enhancement patterns [P=0.046, OR: 0.157 (0.025-0.965)], maximum tumor diameter [P=0.037, OR:4.372 (1.093-17.488)], DWI rim [P=0.024, OR: 0.193 (0.047-0.803)], and ADCration [P=0.010, OR: 1.056 (1.013-1.101) were independent predictors of LVI. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the comprehensive prediction model based on MRI features and peritumoral intratumoral ADC ratio in the training and validation groups were 0.867 and 0.872, the specificity were 88.6% and 84.6%, and the precision were 74.2% and 69.7%, respectively. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted and actual values in the training and validation groups.Conclusions LVI is correlated with various clinical and pathological prognostic factors and MRI imaging features. The comprehensive model based on preoperative MRI features and apparent diffusion coefficient demonstrates good predictive efficiency for LVI, that contribute to clinical decision-making in guiding surgery, developing individualized treatment plans, and assessing prognosis.
[Keywords] breast tumor；invasive breast cancer；lymphovascular invasion；peritumoral area；nomogram；magnetic resonance imaging；apparent diffusion coefficient

CHENG Sijia   ZHAI Xiaoyang   ZHOU Shihao   MAO Ke   WEI Hanyu   HAN Dongming*  

Department of MRI, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453100, China

Corresponding author: HAN D M, E-mail: 625492590@qq.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2023-08-11
Accepted  2024-04-23
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.05.018
Cite this article as CHENG S J, ZHAI X Y, ZHOU S H, et al. Nomogram for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer using MRI features and quantitative parameters[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2024, 15(5): 111-118. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.05.018.

[1]
SUNG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
[2]
HWANG K T, KIM Y A, KIM J, et al. The influences of peritumoral lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion on the survival and recurrence according to the molecular subtypes of breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2017, 163(1): 71-82. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4153-4.
[3]
SCHOPPMANN S F, BAYER G, AUMAYR K, et al. Prognostic value of lymphangiogenesis and lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 306-312. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133355.48672.22.
[4]
OUYANG F S, GUO B L, HUANG X Y, et al. A nomogram for individual prediction of vascular invasion in primary breast cancer[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2019, 110: 30-38 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30599870/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.11.013.
[5]
NI-JIA-TI M Y, AI-HAI-TI D L, HUO-JIA A S, et al. Development of a risk-stratification scoring system for predicting lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer[J/OL]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 94 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32013960/. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6578-0.
[6]
CHEON H, KIM H J, LEE S M, et al. Preoperative MRI features associated with lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 46(4): 1037-1044. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25710.
[7]
HORVAT J V, BERNARD-DAVILA B, HELBICH T H, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for prediction of immunohistochemical receptor status, proliferation rate, and molecular subtypes of breast cancer[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 50(3): 836-846. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26697.
[8]
REN C C, ZOU Y, ZHANG X D, et al. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient and its association with histological prognostic factors in breast cancer[J]. Oncol Lett, 2019, 18(3): 3295-3303. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10651.
[9]
MARTINCICH L, DEANTONI V, BERTOTTO I, et al. Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers[J]. Eur Radiol, 2012, 22(7): 1519-1528. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2403-8.
[10]
ZHAO M, FU K, ZHANG L, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer: a comparison with benign lesions and evaluation of heterogeneity in different tumor regions with prognostic factors and molecular classification[J]. Oncol Lett, 2018, 16(4): 5100-5112. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9312.
[11]
KARAN B, POURBAGHER A, TORUN N. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 43(6): 1434-1444. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25112.
[12]
MORI N, MUGIKURA S, TAKASAWA C, et al. Peritumoral apparent diffusion coefficients for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer[J]. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(2): 331-339. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3847-4.
[13]
YANG W, QIANG J W, TIAN H P, et al. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 45(6): 1771-1779. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25542.
[14]
ZHOU L, XIONG L. Correlations between different apparent diffusion coefficients and lymphatic invasion in the breast cancer[J]. Radiol Pract, 2019, 34(7): 788-791. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2019.07.014.
[15]
CHOI B B. Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI and diffusion-weighted image as predictors of lymphovascular invasion in node-negative invasive breast cancer[J/OL]. World J Surg Oncol, 2021, 19(1): 76 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33722246/. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02189-3.
[16]
Compilation group of guidelines for immunohistochemical detection of progesterone receptor in breast cancer females. Guidelines for immunohistochemical detection of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer[J]. Chin J Pathol, 2015, 44(4): 237-239. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2015.04.005.
[17]
Compilation group of guidelines for HER2 detection in breast cancer. Guideline for HER2 detection in breast cancer, the 2019 version[J]. Chin J Pathol, 2019, 48(3): 169-175. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2019.03.001.
[18]
GOLDHIRSCH A, WINER E P, COATES A S, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013[J]. Ann Oncol, 2013, 24(9): 2206-2223. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt303.
[19]
KARIRI Y A, ALESKANDARANY M A, JOSEPH C, et al. Molecular complexity of lymphovascular invasion: the role of cell migration in breast cancer as a prototype[J]. Pathobiology, 2020, 87(4): 218-231. DOI: 10.1159/000508337.
[20]
MEI F, LIU J Y, XUE W C. Histological grading of invasive breast cancer :Nottingham histological grading system[J]. Chin J Pathol, 2019, 48(8): 659-664. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529?5807.2019.08.019.
[21]
JACQUEMIER J, CHARAFE-JAUFFRET E, MONVILLE F, et al. Association of GATA3, P53, Ki67 status and vascular peritumoral invasion are strongly prognostic in luminal breast cancer[J/OL]. Breast Cancer Res, 2009, 11(2): R23 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19405945/. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2249.
[22]
XUE M, CHE S N, TIAN Y, et al. Nomogram based on breast MRI and clinicopathologic features for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study[J/OL]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2022, 22(4): e428-e437 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34865995/. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.10.014.
[23]
KATO T, KAMEOKA S, KIMURA T, et al. The combination of angiogenesis and blood vessel invasion as a prognostic indicator in primary breast cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 2003, 88(12): 1900-1908. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600921.
[24]
IGARASHI T, FURUBE H, ASHIDA H, et al. Breast MRI for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2018, 107: 111-118 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30292254/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.024.
[25]
CHAN T S, SHAKED Y, TSAI K K. Targeting the interplay between cancer fibroblasts, mesenchymal stem cells, and cancer stem cells in desmoplastic cancers[J/OL]. Front Oncol, 2019, 9: 688 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31417869/. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00688.
[26]
PARK N J, JEONG J Y, PARK J Y, et al. Peritumoral edema in breast cancer at preoperative MRI: an interpretative study with histopathological review toward understanding tumor microenvironment[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 12992 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34155253/. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92283-z.
[27]
BYON J H, PARK Y V, YOON J H, et al. Added value of MRI for invasive breast cancer including the entire axilla for evaluation of high-level or advanced axillary lymph node metastasis in the post-ACOSOG Z0011 trial era[J]. Radiology, 2021, 300(1): 46-54. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202683.
[28]
XU Z Y, DING Y Y, ZHAO K, et al. MRI characteristics of breast edema for assessing axillary lymph node burden in early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective bicentric study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(12): 8213-8225. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08896-z.
[29]
DURANDO M, GENNARO L, CHO G Y, et al. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(9): 1651-1658. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.06.019.
[30]
OKUMA H, SUDAH M, KETTUNEN T, et al. Peritumor to tumor apparent diffusion coefficient ratio is associated with biologically more aggressive breast cancer features and correlates with the prognostication tools[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(6): e0235278 [2023-08-10]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32584887/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235278.
[31]
KETTUNEN T, OKUMA H, AUVINEN P, et al. Peritumoral ADC values in breast cancer: region of interest selection, associations with hyaluronan intensity, and prognostic significance[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(1): 38-46. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06361-y.

PREV Combining the X-ray and MRI characteristics with the clinical pathology to predict ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion of breast
NEXT Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using 4D Flow CMR: Impact of myocardial fibrosis
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn