Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Technical Article
The study on image quality and quantitative parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging reconstructed based on intelligent quick magnetic resonance technology in prostate cancer
XIE Xiaoliang  ZHU Xi  LIU Chenxuan  ZHAI Runya  ZHANG Rongrong  HUANG Wennuo  JIAO Zhiyun  WANG Wei  ZHAO Yi 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2025.11.026.


[Abstract] Objective To assess the impact of intelligent quick magnetic resonance (IQMR) reconstruction technology on the image quality and quantitative parameters of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in prostate cancer.Materials and Methods Axial T2-weighted imaging with fat-saturation (T2WI-FS) and field of view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot DWI (FOCUS-DWI) sequences, along with clinical data, were retrospectively collected from 31 patients with prostate cancer. The FOCUS-DWI images were processed using the IQMR post-processing system to automatically generate IQMR-FOCUS-DWI images. Two radiologists independently evaluated two sets of images FOCUS-DWI and IQMR-FOCUS-DWI scoring them for noise level, geometric distortion, artifacts, and overall image quality. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of prostate cancer lesions and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of prostate cancer lesions to the internal obturator muscles were measured and compared between the two image sets. Additionally, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of prostate cancer lesions were measured and compared between the two sequences.Results Qualitative analysis showed that IQMR-FOCUS-DWI images received higher scores than FOCUS-DWI images in noise level, geometric distortion, and overall image quality (P ≤ 0.005). Although IQMR-FOCUS-DWI images also received higher artifact scores, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.313). Quantitative analysis revealed that SNR and CNR were significantly higher in IQMR-FOCUS-DWI images compared to FOCUS-DWI images (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the lesion ADC values between the IQMR-FOCUS-DWI sequence and the FOCUS-DWI sequence (P = 0.061).Conclusions Compared to the FOCUS-DWI sequence, IQMR technology significantly improves the image quality of prostate DWI, resulting in higher SNR, CNR, and subjective image scores.
[Keywords] prostate cancer;prostatic lesions;diffusion-weighted imaging;intelligent quick magnetic resonance;magnetic resonance imaging

XIE Xiaoliang1   ZHU Xi2   LIU Chenxuan1   ZHAI Runya1   ZHANG Rongrong1   HUANG Wennuo2   JIAO Zhiyun1   WANG Wei1   ZHAO Yi1*  

1 Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225100, China

2 Department of Radiology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, 225001, China

Corresponding author: ZHAO Y, E-mail: zhaoyi8706@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2025-07-15
Accepted  2025-11-10
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2025.11.026
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2025.11.026.

[1]
MIRZAEI S, PASKEH M D A, OKINA E, et al. Molecular landscape of LncRNAs in prostate cancer: a focus on pathways and therapeutic targets for intervention[J/OL]. J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2022, 41(1): 214 [2025-04-01]. https://jeccr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13046-022-02406-1. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02406-1.
[2]
ROSELLINI M, SANTONI M, MOLLICA V, et al. Treating prostate cancer by antibody-drug conjugates[J/OL]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(4): 1551 [2025-04-02]. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/4/1551. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041551.
[3]
LEE C Y, MANI M. 2D CAIPI accelerated 3D multi-slab diffusion weighted EPI combined with qModeL reconstruction for fast high resolution microstructure imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2024, 111: 57-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.04.003.
[4]
LEE P K, ZHOU X T, HARGREAVES B A. Robust multishot diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen with region-based shot rejection[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2024, 92(2): 519-531. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30102.
[5]
CHATTERJEE A, HARMATH C, OTO A. New prostate MRI techniques and sequences[J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2020, 45(12): 4052-4062. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02504-8.
[6]
TSURUTA C, HIRATA K, KUDO K, et al. DWI-related texture analysis for prostate cancer: differences in correlation with histological aggressiveness and data repeatability between peripheral and transition zones[J/OL]. Eur Radiol Exp, 2022, 6(1): 1 [2025-04-20]. https://eurradiolexp.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41747-021-00252-y. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-021-00252-y.
[7]
WICAKSONO K P, FUJIMOTO K, FUSHIMI Y, et al. Super-resolution application of generative adversarial network on brain time-of-flight MR angiography: image quality and diagnostic utility evaluation[J]. Eur Radiol, 2023, 33(2): 936-946. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09103-9.
[8]
DO W J, SEO S, HAN Y, et al. Reconstruction of multicontrast MR images through deep learning[J]. Med Phys, 2020, 47(3): 983-997. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14006.
[9]
REN J T, ERIKSEN J G, NIJKAMP J, et al. Comparing different CT, PET and MRI multi-modality image combinations for deep learning-based head and neck tumor segmentation[J]. Acta Oncol, 2021, 60(11): 1399-1406. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1949034.
[10]
BIELAK L, WIEDENMANN N, BERLIN A, et al. Convolutional neural networks for head and neck tumor segmentation on 7-channel multiparametric MRI: a leave-one-out analysis[J/OL]. Radiat Oncol, 2020, 15(1): 181 [2025-05-05]. https://ro-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13014-020-01618-z. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01618-z.
[11]
HERRMANN J, AFAT S, GASSENMAIER S, et al. Image quality and diagnostic performance of accelerated 2D hip MRI with deep learning reconstruction based on a deep iterative hierarchical network[J/OL]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2023, 13(20): 3241 [2025-05-07] .https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/20/3241. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13203241.
[12]
KANEMARU N, TAKAO H, AMEMIYA S, et al. The effect of a post-scan processing denoising system on image quality and morphometric analysis[J]. J Neuroradiol, 2022, 49(2): 205-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2021.11.007.
[13]
YAO H, JIA B S, PAN X L, et al. Validation and feasibility of ultrafast cervical spine MRI using a deep learning-assisted 3D iterative image enhancement system[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2024, 17: 2499-2509. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S465002.
[14]
LUO W, ZHANG Y L, ZHOU L C. Diagnostic value of different b-value DWI for benign and malignant lesions of central gland prostate[J]. J Pract Radiol, 2019, 35(9): 1460-1463, 1475. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2019.09.020.
[15]
LIU C Y, LI S D, LI X F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-high b-value DWI plus T2WI in patients with clinically insignificant carcinoma of prostate transitional zone[J]. J Clin Radiol, 2020, 39(5): 1018-1023. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2020.05.039.
[16]
WANG J H, SONG L, SUI X, et al. The value of deep learning reconstruction in improving the quality of chest low-dose CT images[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2022(1): 74-80. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210504-00441.
[17]
XIE X L, ZHANG Y, SUN Q A, et al. Application value of multiplexed sensitivity encoding diffusion weighted imaging in neck MRI scanning[J]. J Pract Radiol, 2024(3): 468-472. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2024.03.029.
[18]
SABOURI S, CHANG S D, GOLDENBERG S L, et al. Comparing diagnostic accuracy of luminal water imaging with diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: a quantitative MRI study[J/OL]. NMR Biomed, 2019, 32(2): e4048 [2025-05-25]. https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nbm.4048. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4048.
[19]
IIMA M, PARTRIDGE S C, LE BIHAN D. Six DWI questions you always wanted to know but were afraid to ask: clinical relevance for breast diffusion MRI[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(5): 2561-2570. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06648-0.
[20]
LEE K L, KESSLER D A, DEZONIE S, et al. Assessment of deep learning-based reconstruction on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI image quality[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2023, 166: 111017 [2025-05-27]. https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(23)00331-5/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111017.
[21]
FAN W W, FENG Q Q, LI E N, et al. Application of deep learning reconstruction techniques in optimizing breast MRI image quality[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2024, 15(10): 43-49. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.10.008.
[22]
AFAT S, HERRMANN J, ALMANSOUR H, et al. Acquisition time reduction of diffusion-weighted liver imaging using deep learning image reconstruction[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2023, 104(4): 178-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.11.002.

PREV Experimental study on diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis using different models of multi-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
NEXT Postoperative recurrence and metastasis of adult intraspinal neuroblastoma: A case report
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn