Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Clinical Article
Prognostic value of an MRI-based radiomics machine learning model for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy
SUN Liting  SHANG Jianan  ZHANG Qinghua 

DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.01.013.


[Abstract] Objective To construct a machine learning model for predicting the prognosis of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features, and to evaluate its predictive performance.Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 424 LACC patients admitted to the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from February 2019 to February 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to a modeling group (n = 339) and an internal validation group (n = 85) at a 4∶1 ratio. Additionally, 120 LACC patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University during the same period were enrolled as the external validation group. Clinical data and MRI images (including transverse dynamic contrast-enhanced T1WI, transverse fast spin echo T2WI, and transverse diffusion-weighted imaging sequences) were collected. The region of interest (ROI) was delineated in the lesion area, and radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Dimensionality reduction and selection of radiomics features were conducted via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. A radiomics model was constructed based on the selected features, and radiomics scores (Rads) were calculated. Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using patient clinical data and Rads to establish a prognostic prediction model for CCRT in LACC patients, followed by validation of the model's predictive performance.Results Thirteen MRI radiomics features were selected by the LASSO algorithm. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses demonstrated that external beam radiotherapy dose [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.275, 95% CI: 1.186 to 1.371] and 2 Gy fractionated radiation equivalent dose (HR = 1.092, 95% CI: 1.050 to 1.137) were independent risk factors for mortality following CCRT in LACC patients, whereas hemoglobin (HR = 0.962, 95% CI: 0.940 to 0.985) and Rads (HR = 0.949, 95% CI: 0.933 to 0.965) were protective factors (all P < 0.05). Model validation showed that the area under the curve (AUC) values for internal and external validation were 0.978 (95% CI: 0.965 to 1.000) and 0.971 (95% CI: 0.958 to 0.996), respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded chi-square values of 8.580 (P = 0.379) and 8.691 (P = 0.370) for internal and external validation, respectively.Conclusions This study established a nomogram prediction model based on MRI radiomics, which exhibits excellent predictive performance and clinical utility for the prognosis of CCRT in LACC patients. It may serve as a reference for the formulation and adjustment of CCRT treatment plans for LACC patients.
[Keywords] uterine cervical neoplasms;chemoradiotherapy;magnetic resonance imaging;machine learning;nomograms;prognosis

SUN Liting1   SHANG Jianan1   ZHANG Qinghua2*  

1 Department of Gynecology, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China

2 Department of Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China

Corresponding author: ZHANG Q H, E-mail: 15739075856@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2025-06-25
Accepted  2025-12-06
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.01.013
DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.01.013.

[1]
LI Z, LIU P L, YIN A J, et al. Global landscape of cervical cancer incidence and mortality in 2022 and predictions to 2030: The urgent need to address inequalities in cervical cancer[J]. Int J Cancer, 2025, 157(2): 288-297. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35369.
[2]
FILHO A M, LAVERSANNE M, FERLAY J, et al. The GLOBOCAN 2022 cancer estimates: Data sources, methods, and a snapshot of the cancer burden worldwide[J]. Int J Cancer, 2025, 156(7): 1336-1346. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35278.
[3]
BARBERA F, FRASSINE F, VOLPI G, et al. Locally advanced cervical cancer: how the improvement in techniques in external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy impacts on survival outcomes and long-term toxicities[J]. Radiol Med, 2023, 128(12): 1542-1552. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01705-7.
[4]
COLLARINO A, FEUDO V, PASCIUTO T, et al. Is PET radiomics useful to predict pathologic tumor response and prognosis in locally advanced cervical cancer [J]. J Nucl Med, 2024, 65(6): 962-970. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.267044.
[5]
YOO J G, LEE S J, NAM E J, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for cervical cancer: the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology guidelines[J/OL]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2024, 35(2): e44 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38389404/. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e44.
[6]
MCCORMACK M, EMINOWICZ G, GALLARDO D, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy versus standard chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (GCIG INTERLACE): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet, 2024, 404(10462): 1525-1535. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01438-7.
[7]
CAI C, XIAO J F, CAI R, et al. Longitudinal dynamic MRI radiomic models for early prediction of prognosis in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J/OL]. Radiat Oncol, 2024, 19(1): 181 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39707484/. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02574-8.
[8]
WENG D H, XIONG H H, ZHU C K, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a randomized, non-inferiority, multicenter trial[J]. Front Med, 2023, 17(1): 93-104. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-021-0892-z.
[9]
ZHANG X J, GU M X, ZHU J H, et al. Prognostic value of Naples Prognostic Score in locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. Biomol Biomed, 2025, 25(5): 986-999. DOI: 10.17305/bb.2024.10989.
[10]
CHEN B J, DU D, DENG Y, et al. Analysis of clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of radical simultaneous radiotherapy and chemotherapy in 106 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer[J]. Prog Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 32(3): 207-213. DOI: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2023.03.005.
[11]
CHU Q X, WANG C Z, DING Q P, et al. Influencing factors in remission effect of patients with advanced cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and prediction model construction[J]. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 25(5): 392-395. DOI: 10.13390/j.issn.1672-1861.2024.05.003.
[12]
ZHANG Y, LIU L, ZHANG K Y, et al. Nomograms combining clinical and imaging parameters to predict recurrence and disease-free survival after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer[J]. Acad Radiol, 2023, 30(3): 499-508. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.08.002.
[13]
DAI D F, PEI Y F, ZHU B Q, et al. Chemoradiotherapy-induced ACKR2+ tumor cells drive CD8+ T cell senescence and cervical cancer recurrence[J/OL]. Cell Rep Med, 2024, 5(5): 101550 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38723624/. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101550.
[14]
GU S W /Y), AI C H, WANG G S, et al. Research progress of MRI and imaging in the evaluation of curative effect and prognosis of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cervical cancer[J]. Radiol Pract, 2024, 39(5): 699-703. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.05.023.
[15]
JAJODIA A, GUPTA A, PROSCH H, et al. Combination of radiomics and machine learning with diffusion-weighted MR imaging for clinical outcome prognostication in cervical cancer[J]. Tomography, 2021, 7(3): 344-357. DOI: 10.3390/tomography7030031.
[16]
ZHANG X M, ZHAO J W, ZHANG Q, et al. MRI-based radiomics value for predicting the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical squamous cell cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J/OL]. Cancer Imaging, 2022, 22(1): 35 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35842679/. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00474-2.
[17]
LUCIA F, VISVIKIS D, DESSEROIT M C, et al. Prediction of outcome using pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI radiomics in locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag, 2018, 45(5): 768-786. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3898-7.
[18]
ASSOCIATION W M. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human participants[J]. JAMA, 2025, 333(1): 71-74. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972.
[19]
KOH W J, ABU-RUSTUM N R, BEAN S, et al. Cervical cancer, version 3.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(1): 64-84. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001.
[20]
BHATLA N, AOKI D, SHARMA D N, et al. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2021, 155(Suppl 1): 28-44. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13865.
[21]
WANG X M, XU J, ZHANG H Y, et al. The effect of albumin and hemoglobin levels on the prognosis of early-stage cervical cancer: a prospective, single-center-based cohort study[J/OL]. BMC Womens Health, 2023, 23(1): 553 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37875880/. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-023-02713-5.
[22]
FAN X, WANG Y F, YANG N, et al. Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery[J/OL]. World J Surg Oncol, 2023, 21(1): 186 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37344912/. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03076-9.
[23]
LI J, NIU C L, ZHANG L, et al. Association of body composition and systemic inflammation for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer following concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2024, 30(5): 279-290. DOI: 10.4274/dir.2024.242751.
[24]
KE T Y, WANG J B, ZHANG N, et al. Dose-effect relationship between dose-volume parameters of residual gross tumor volume and clinical prognosis in MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective study[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2023, 199(2): 131-140. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-02000-6.
[25]
COLES C E, HAVILAND J S, KIRBY A M, et al. Dose-escalated simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy in early breast cancer (IMPORT HIGH): a multicentre, phase 3, non-inferiority, open-label, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2023, 401(10394): 2124-2137. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00619-0.
[26]
CHIBONDA S, NDLOVU N, TSIKAI N, et al. Working title: high dose rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy with cobalt 60 source for locally advanced cervical cancer: the zimbabwean experience[J/OL]. Infect Agent Cancer, 2021, 16(1): 1 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33413523/. DOI: 10.1186/s13027-020-00340-5.
[27]
WEI Z G, PENG X C, HE L, et al. Treatment plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using either 6- or 10-MV photon energies[J/OL]. J Appl Clin Med Phys, 2022, 23(8): e13714 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35808973/. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13714.
[28]
DRISHYA S, DHANISHA S S, RAGHUKUMAR P, et al. Amomum subulatum mitigates experimental thoracic radiation-induced lung injury by regulating antioxidant status and inflammatory responses[J]. Food Funct, 2023, 14(3): 1545-1559. DOI: 10.1039/d2fo03208b.
[29]
PADHI S, MAHAPATRA B R, PATI K C, et al. Comparison of acute gastrointestinal toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients of carcinoma cervix[J/OL]. Cureus, 2023, 15(11): e48876 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38106724/. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.48876.
[30]
PERKINS D W, STEINER I, HAIDER S, et al. Therapy-induced normal tissue damage promotes breast cancer metastasis[J/OL]. iScience, 2023, 27(1): 108503 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38161426/. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108503.
[31]
ELMALI A, GULER O C, DEMIRHAN B, et al. Long-term analysis of hematological parameters as predictors of recurrence patterns and treatment outcomes in cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2024, 200(11): 949-957. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02278-8.
[32]
DEAR T, CHIU J, MEIROVICH H, et al. Are outcomes of locally advanced cervical cancer associated with prebrachytherapy hemoglobin values and transfusion practice An observational study comparing two large academic centres with divergent clinical guidelines[J]. Brachytherapy, 2024, 23(6): 660-667. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.07.006.
[33]
KOIVUNEN E, MADHAVAN S, GARRIDO L B, et al. Hypoxia favors tumor growth in colorectal cancer in an integrin αDβ1/hemoglobin δ-dependent manner[J/OL]. Life Sci Alliance, 2024, 8(2): e202402925 [2025-10-16]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39626964/. DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202402925.
[34]
ZHANG Q, MA Y X, DAI Z, et al. Tracking research on hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers: a scientometric analysis and in-depth review[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2023, 17: 2549-2571. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S422770.
[35]
BIZZARRI N, RUSSO L, DOLCIAMI M, et al. Radiomics systematic review in cervical cancer: gynecological oncologists' perspective[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2023, 33(10): 1522-1541. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004589.
[36]
DONG L X, LIU J J, ZHANG Y J, et al. Prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in locally advanced cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on pre-treatment multi-parameter MRI radiomics features[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2024, 15(8): 25-30, 45. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2024.08.004.
[37]
LI Z C, LI H L, WANG S Y, et al. MR-based radiomics nomogram of cervical cancer in prediction of the lymph-vascular space invasion preoperatively[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 49(5): 1420-1426. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26531.
[38]
AUTORINO R, GUI B, PANZA G, et al. Radiomics-based prediction of two-year clinical outcome in locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy[J]. Radiol Med, 2022, 127(5): 498-506. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01482-9.

PREV Conventional clinicopathological features combined with MRI-based radiomics model for predicting programmed death-ligand 1 expression
NEXT A prenatal MRI signs- clinical scoring system to predict the classifications of placenta accreta spectrum
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn