Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Clinical Article
Value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with late-onset cardiac phenotype fabry disease carrying the c.640-801G > A mutation
XU Yilin  CHEN Rui  JIANG Yuhang  DAI Xiaomin  CHEN Hong  MA Mingping  YIN Lei 

Cite this article as XU Y L, CHEN R, JIANG Y H, et al. Value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with late-onset cardiac phenotype fabry disease carrying the c.640-801G > A mutation[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2026, 17(6): 71-78. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.06.009.


[Abstract] Objective To investigate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in differentiating patients with late-onset cardiac phenotype Fabry disease (FD) carrying the c.640-801G > A mutation from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).Materials and Methods A total of 28 patients with FD who visited Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital between November 2019 and October 2024 were retrospectively enrolled as the FD group. A demographically matched cohort of 28 patients with HCM was enrolled as the HCM group, along with 28 healthy controls (HC). Clinical baseline data were collected from all patients and healthy subjects. Standard CMR examinations were performed using a 3.0 T MRI scanner. Depending on the normality of distribution, continuous variables were compared using parametric tests (independent samples t-test) or non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney U test). Proportions were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Multiple comparisons for continuous variables were corrected using the Bonferroni method. The efficacy of native T1 mapping in differentiating FD from HCM was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC).Results Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was present in 24 of the 28 FD patients (86%) and all 28 HCM patients (100%), with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.111). However, the left ventricular lateral wall thickness was significantly greater in FD patients compared to both HCM patients and HCs (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the septal-to-lateral wall ratio was significantly lower in FD than in HCM (P < 0.001), indicating a more symmetrical pattern of LVH in FD. Regarding late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), there was no significant difference in the overall presence of any LGE between the FD and HCM groups (P > 0.999). However, LGE in the basal inferolateral wall (P < 0.001) and at the apex (P = 0.029) was significantly more common in FD compared to HCM. Native T1 values were significantly lower in FD than in HCM for global T1 (P < 0.001), septal T1 (P < 0.001), and T1 within LGE areas (P < 0.001). Compared to HC, FD patients had significantly lower septal native T1 values (P = 0.001), while global native T1 values showed no significant difference (P = 0.121). Native T1 cutoff values of 1240 ms in the interventricular septum, 1273 ms in the global left ventricle, and 1302 ms in LGE areas could effectively differentiate FD from HCM. Septal native T1 demonstrated the strongest discriminative power, with a sensitivity of 89.3%, specificity of 96.43%, positive likelihood ratio of 25.0, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.11.Conclusions CMR can effectively differentiate patients with the late-onset cardiac phenotype of FD carrying the c.640-801G > A mutation from those with HCM. Compared with HCM, patients with this FD phenotype exhibit a decreased native T1 value on CMR images, an LGE pattern predominantly involving the basal inferolateral segment of the left ventricle, and relatively symmetric LVH. The finding of normal global native T1 values in the presence of extensive LGE suggests pseudo-normalization of native T1.
[Keywords] late-onset fabry disease;c.640-801G > A;hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;cardiac magnetic resonance;pseudo-normalization;magnetic resonance imaging

XU Yilin   CHEN Rui   JIANG Yuhang   DAI Xiaomin   CHEN Hong   MA Mingping   YIN Lei*  

Department of Radiology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China

Corresponding author: YIN L, E-mail: yinlei0591@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2026-02-04
Accepted  2026-05-27
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.06.009
Cite this article as XU Y L, CHEN R, JIANG Y H, et al. Value of cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with late-onset cardiac phenotype fabry disease carrying the c.640-801G > A mutation[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2026, 17(6): 71-78. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2026.06.009.

[1]
Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of adult Fabry disease cardiomyopathy[J]. Chin J Cardiol, 2024, 52(2): 128-136. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231008-00263.
[2]
Chinese Fabry Disease Expert Panel. Expert consensus for diagnosis and treatment of Fabry disease in China (2021)[J]. Chin J Intern Med, 2021, 60(4): 321-330. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20201218-01028.
[3]
HUNG C L, WU Y W, KUO L, et al. 2024 update of the TSOC expert consensus of fabry disease[J]. Acta Cardiol Sin, 2024, 40(5): 544-568. DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202409_40(5).20240731A.
[4]
PIERONI M, MOON J C, ARBUSTINI E, et al. Cardiac involvement in fabry disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(7): 922-936. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.024.
[5]
BURLINA A, BRAND E, HUGHES D, et al. An expert consensus on the recommendations for the use of biomarkers in Fabry disease[J]. Mol Genet Metab, 2023, 139(2): 107585. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2023.107585.
[6]
OLSZEWSKA M, SCHWERMER K, PAWLACZYK K. Newborn screening in fabry disease[J/OL]. Int J Mol Sci, 2025, 26(24): 12125 [2026-01-08]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12733831/. DOI: 10.3390/ijms262412125.
[7]
HSU T R, HUNG S C, CHANG F P, et al. Later onset fabry disease, cardiac damage progress in silence[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2016, 68(23): 2554-2563. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.943.
[8]
SADASIVAN C, CHOW J T Y, SHENG B, et al. Screening for Fabry Disease in patients with unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(9): e0239675 [2026-01-08]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7521938/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239675.
[9]
CHANG F P, HSU T R, HUNG S C, et al. Cardiomyocyte globotriaosylceramide accumulation in adult male patients with fabry disease and IVS4 + 919G>A GLA mutation is progressive with age and correlates with left ventricular hypertrophy and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction[J/OL]. medRxiv, 2023: 2023.12.09.23298489 [2026-01-08]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10760261/. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.09.23298489.
[10]
LIANG K H, LU Y H, NIU C W, et al. The Fabry disease-causing mutation, GLA IVS4+919G>A, originated in China's mainland more than 800 years ago[J]. J Hum Genet, 2020, 65(7): 619-625. DOI: 10.1038/s10038-020-0745-7.
[11]
LIN H Y, CHONG K W, HSU J H, et al. High incidence of the cardiac variant of fabry disease revealed by newborn screening in the Taiwan Chinese population[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet, 2009, 2(5): 450-456. DOI: 10.1161/circgenetics.109.862920.
[12]
SUN Y, GUAN X W, WANG Y Y, et al. Newborn genetic screening for Fabry disease: Insights from a retrospective analysis in Nanjing, China[J/OL]. Clin Chim Acta, 2024, 557: 117889 [2025-07-07]. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000989812400130X. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.117889.
[13]
CHANG W H, NIU D M, LU C Y, et al. Modulation the alternative splicing of GLA (IVS4+919G>A) in Fabry disease[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(4): e0175929 [2025-06-23]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5400244/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175929.
[14]
LU Y H, HUANG P H, WANG L Y, et al. Improvement in the sensitivity of newborn screening for Fabry disease among females through the use of a high-throughput and cost-effective method, DNA mass spectrometry[J]. J Hum Genet, 2018, 63(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s10038-017-0366-y.
[15]
WANG Y J, YANG K, WEN Y, et al. Screening and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease using artificial intelligence-enabled cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(5): 1471-1480. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02971-2.
[16]
LEE C L, LIN S P, NIU D M, et al. Fabry disease and the effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) improvement: a review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2022, 19(1): 126-131. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.66448.
[17]
HWU W L. Deciphering the diagnostic dilemma: a comprehensive review of the Taiwan residents cardiac variant in Fabry disease[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2024, 123(7): 738-743. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.004.
[18]
HAMMERSLEY D J, ZEGARD A, ANDROULAKIS E, et al. Arrhythmic risk stratification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2024, 84(15): 1407-1420. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.046.
[19]
DI MARCO A, BROWN P F, BRADLEY J, et al. Improved risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(23): 2890-2905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.030.
[20]
NORDIN S, KOZOR R, MEDINA-MENACHO K, et al. Proposed stages of myocardial phenotype development in fabry disease[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2019, 12(8): 1673-1683. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.03.020.
[21]
AIDA H, NISHIKAWA R, YANO T, et al. Pathological analysis of T1 pseudonormalization in the advanced stage of female fabry cardiomyopathy[J/OL]. Circ Heart Fail, 2025, 18(5) [2025-12-30]. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.012234. DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.124.012234.
[22]
KARUR G R, ROBISON S, IWANOCHKO R M, et al. Use of myocardial T1 mapping at 3.0 T to differentiate Anderson-fabry disease from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Radiology, 2018, 288(2): 398-406. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172613.
[23]
DEBORDE E, DUBOURG B, BEJAR S, et al. Differentiation between Fabry disease and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with cardiac T1 mapping[J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2020, 101(2): 59-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.08.006.
[24]
ANAN I, SAKUMA T, FUKURO E, et al. The role of native T1 values on the evaluation of cardiac manifestation in Japanese Fabry disease patients[J/OL]. Mol Genet Metab Rep, 2022, 31: 100858 [2025-07-12]. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214426922000180. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2022.100858.
[25]
LI J L, PU L T, XU Z Q, et al. Screening for Fabry disease in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Eur Radiol, 2025, 35(5): 2888-2898. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11203-7.
[26]
ARBELO E, PROTONOTARIOS A, GIMENO J R, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(37): 3503-3626. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad194.
[27]
ROY C, SLIMANI A, DE MEESTER C, et al. Age and sex corrected normal reference values of T1, T2 T2* and ECV in healthy subjects at 3T CMR[J/OL]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2017, 19(1): 72 [2025-07-10]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5609021/. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0371-5.
[28]
LI R, LEI F, LIU F, et al. The transition from hypertension to hypertensive heart disease and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a retrospective cross-sectional study of myocardial magnetic resonance strain and tissue characteristics[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2024, 14(10): 7684-7696. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-803.
[29]
STORZ C, HETTERICH H, LORBEER R, et al. Myocardial tissue characterization by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with prediabetes, diabetes, and normal controls with preserved ejection fraction from the general population[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2018, 19(6): 701-708. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex190.
[30]
CAMPOREALE A, MORONI F, LAZZERONI D, et al. Trabecular complexity as an early marker of cardiac involvement in Fabry disease[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2022, 23(2): 200-208. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa354.
[31]
MEUCCI M C, LILLO R, LOMBARDO A, et al. Comparative analysis of right ventricular strain in Fabry cardiomyopathy and sarcomeric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2023, 24(4): 542-551. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac151.
[32]
XU Y F, YANG K, LIU X F, et al. Clinical and cardiac MR characteristics of heart involvement in patients with Fabry disease[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2022, 56(2): 168-174. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210416-00379.
[33]
SADO D M, FLETT A S, BANYPERSAD S M, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurement of myocardial extracellular volume in health and disease[J]. Heart, 2012, 98(19): 1436-1441. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302346.
[34]
FRUSTACI A, SCARPA M, MARIA DA RIOL R, et al. Fabry cardiomyopathy: Gb3-induced auto-reactive panmyocarditis requiring heart transplantation[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2020, 7(3): 1331-1337. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12723.
[35]
FRUSTACI A, VERARDO R, MAGNOCAVALLO M, et al. Circulating anti-GB3 antibody as a biomarker of myocardial inflammation in patients with fabry disease cardiomyopathy[J/OL]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(12): 4068 [2025-12-30]. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10299309/. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124068.
[36]
SADO D M, WHITE S K, PIECHNIK S K, et al. Identification and assessment of Anderson-fabry disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2013, 6(3): 392-398. DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.112.000070.
[37]
NOJIRI A, ANAN I, MORIMOTO S, et al. Clinical findings of gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in Fabry patients[J]. J Cardiol, 2020, 75(1): 27-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.09.002.

PREV Application of MRI radiomics in predicting early response to IMRT combined with targeted therapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma
NEXT Predictive value of MRI parameter values for prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn