Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]11002
• Technical Article •
A comparative study of three scanning sequences on the arterial phase and image quality of gadoxetic acid disodium liver-enhanced MRI
MA Feng  LIU Fen  ZHANG Shutong 

Cite this article as: MA F, LIU F, ZHANG S T. A comparative study of three scanning sequences on the arterial phase and image quality of gadoxetic acid disodium liver-enhanced MRI[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 14(2): 125-131. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.02.021.


[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effects of shortened acquisition time and multiple arterial phase scanning techniques on gadoxetate acid disodium liver-enhanced MRI arterial phase imaging.Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 253 patients who underwent liver-enhanced MRI with gadoxetate acid disodium from May 2018 to December 2021 was performed. Patients were divided into three groups according to different examination modalities: conventional volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (C-VIBE) in 87 cases (single-artery phase, scan time 16 s); shortened acquisition volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (S-VIBE) in 78 cases (single-artery phase, scan time 12 s); multi-arterial phase scans (CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE, CDT-VIBE) of 88 cases (five multi-arterial phases, scan time 16 s). We evaluated the phase and image quality of the arterial phases of the images in the three groups separately, all using the quadratic method. The image phase was divided according to the degree of hepatic artery and portal vein display; the subjective image quality was evaluated in terms of image artifacts, liver margin definition and lesion display, and the objective image quality included signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Categorical variables were expressed as number of cases and percentages. χ2 test was used to deal with categorical variables. Measures are expressed as mean±standard deviation (x¯±s), and one-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences in age between groups; the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the differences in image quality between the three serial groups and within the multi-arterial phase group and the differences in SNR and CNR of the three serial images.Results The differences in clinical characteristics (gender, age, pleural fluid, ascites, chronic obstructive disease, cirrhosis) between the three groups were not statistically significant (P＞0.05). There was good agreement between the two MRI physicians in the assessment of arterial phase and image quality (Kappa value＞0.7). In the arterial phase images, the best images in the CDT-VIBE group were scored better than in the C-VIBE and S-VIBE groups (H=23.698, P＜0.001). In the early arterial images, the best image score was better in the CDT-VIBE group than in the C-VIBE group (H=19.415, P=0.043). The best images in the CDT-VIBE group were much better in the early and late arterial phases than in the C-VIBE and S-VIBE groups (P＜0.05). The early arterial images in the CDT-VIBE group were better in the first and second phases than in the last three phases (P＜0.05); the rate of excellent images in the fourth phase of the late arterial phase (78.4%) was much higher than that in the first three phases (P＜0.05). The SNR (H=3.854, P=0.146) and CNR (H=2.120, P=0.346) of the three groups of images were not statistically significant.Conclusions After gadoxetate acid disodium injection, the S-VIBE sequence with shortened acquisition time cannot effectively reduce the images of breath-holding failure, while the CDT-VIBE sequence with multi-arterial phase acquisition can provide more excellent arterial phase images, which can provide both early arterial phase images depicting vessels and late arterial phase images with lesion enhancement information, and can be promoted in clinical applications.
[Keywords] liver；hepatocellular carcinoma；magnetic resonance imaging；gadoxetate acid disodium；arterial phase；image quality

MA Feng   LIU Fen   ZHANG Shutong*  

Department of Radiology, Wuhan Central Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, China

*Correspondence to: Zhang ST, E-mail: 516736048@qq.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2022-09-23
Accepted  2023-01-12
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.02.021
Cite this article as: MA F, LIU F, ZHANG S T. A comparative study of three scanning sequences on the arterial phase and image quality of gadoxetic acid disodium liver-enhanced MRI[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 14(2): 125-131. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.02.021.

[1]
RONG D L, HE B J, TANG W J, et al. Comparison of gadobenate-enhanced MRI and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma detection using LI-RADS version 2018: a prospective intraindividual randomized study[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2022, 218(4): 687-698. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.26818.
[2]
KIERANS A S, KANG S K, ROSENKRANTZ A B. The diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma measuring up to 2 cm: a meta-analysis[J]. Radiology, 2016, 278(1): 82-94. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150177.
[3]
SHAO J, HE Y X. Research progress of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI in evaluating liver function[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(11): 1056-1058. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.11.023.
[4]
CAO L, LI R, ZHANG Q, et al. Progress of Gd-EOB-DTPA in the diagnosis and evaluation of HCC[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 11(10): 943-946. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2020.10.028.
[5]
LEE Y J, LEE J M, LEE J S, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance of multidetector CT and MR imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Radiology, 2015, 275(1): 97-109. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140690.
[6]
KIM B R, LEE J M, LEE D H, et al. Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging versus multidetector CT in the detection of dysplastic nodules and early hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Radiology, 2017, 285(1): 134-146. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017162080.
[7]
Medical Administration Bureau of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. Standardization for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (2022 edition)[J]. Chin J Hepatol, 2022, 30(4): 367-388. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20220413-00193.
[8]
WANG J, ZHENG J, SUN J, et al. The value of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI in predicting microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma and its grade[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(12): 79-83, 88. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.12.016.
[9]
MOTOSUGI U, BANNAS P, BOOKWALTER C A, et al. An investigation of transient severe motion related to gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging[J]. Radiology, 2016, 279(1): 93-102. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150642.
[10]
VIETTI VIOLI N, ARGIRIADI P, ROSEN A, et al. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI: assessment of arterial phase artifacts and hepatobiliary uptake in a large series[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2020, 132: 109313 [2022-09-22]. https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(20)30502-7/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109313.
[11]
TANABE M, HIGASHI M, IIDA E, et al. Transient respiratory motion artifacts in multiple arterial phases on abdominal dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2021, 39(2): 178-185. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-020-01042-z.
[12]
JANG J, CHUNG Y E, KIM S, et al. Fully automatic quantification of transient severe respiratory motion artifact of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI during arterial phase[J]. Med Phys, 2022, 49(11): 7247-7261. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15831.
[13]
MURAKAMI T, SOFUE K, HORI M. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using Gd-EOB-DTPA MR imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2022, 21(1): 168-181. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0031.
[14]
YOO J L, LEE C H, PARK Y S, et al. The short breath-hold technique, controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration, can be the first step to overcoming a degraded hepatic arterial phase in liver magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective randomized control study[J]. Invest Radiol, 2016, 51(7): 440-446. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000249.
[15]
ICHIKAWA S, MOTOSUGI U, SATO K, et al. Transient respiratory-motion artifact and scan timing during the arterial phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging: the benefit of shortened acquisition and multiple arterial phase acquisition[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2021, 20(3): 280-289. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0064.
[16]
PIETRYGA J A, BURKE L M, MARIN D, et al. Respiratory motion artifact affecting hepatic arterial phase imaging with gadoxetate disodium: examination recovery with a multiple arterial phase acquisition[J]. Radiology, 2014, 271(2): 426-434. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131988.
[17]
WEI Y, DENG L P, YUAN Y, et al. Gadoxetate acid disodium-enhanced MRI: multiple arterial phases using differential sub-sampling with Cartesian ordering (DISCO) may achieve more optimal late arterial phases than the single arterial phase imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 61: 116-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.033.
[18]
GRUBER L, RAINER V, PLAIKNER M, et al. CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-VIBE MR imaging of the liver at 3.0T with gadoxetate disodium: a solution for transient arterial-phase respiratory motion-related artifacts?[J]. Eur Radiol, 2018, 28(5): 2013-2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5210-4.
[19]
WEI Y, CHEN G Y, TANG H H, et al. Improved display of hepatic arterial anatomy using differential subsampling with Cartesian ordering (DISCO) with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: comparison with single arterial phase MRI and computed tomographic angiography[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 51(6): 1766-1776. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27020.
[20]
CHOI J Y, LEE J M, SIRLIN C B. CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects[J]. Radiology, 2014, 272(3): 635-654. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14132361.
[21]
KAZMIERCZAK P M, THEISEN D, THIERFELDER K M, et al. Improved detection of hypervascular liver lesions with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-volume-interpolated breath-hold examination[J]. Invest Radiol, 2015, 50(3): 153-160. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000118.
[22]
HONG S B, LEE N K, KIM S, et al. Modified CAIPIRINHA-VIBE without view-sharing on gadoxetic acid-enhanced multi-arterial phase MR imaging for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE[J]. Eur Radiol, 2019, 29(7): 3574-3583. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06095-x.
[23]
PARK Y S, LEE C H, KIM J W, et al. Application of high-speed T1 sequences for high-quality hepatic arterial phase magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of single and multiple arterial phases[J]. Invest Radiol, 2017, 52(10): 605-611. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000378.
[24]
QU J R, HAN S, ZHANG H K, et al. Arterial phase with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST (CDT)-volume-interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) in detecting hepatic metastases[J]. Transl Oncol, 2017, 10(1): 46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.11.005.
[25]
LI H, XIAO Y, WANG S, et al. TWIST-VIBE five-arterial-phase technology decreases transient severe motion after bolus injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA[J/OL]. Clin Radiol, 2017, 72(9): 800.e1-800.e6 [2022-09-22]. https://www.clinicalradiologyonline.net/article/S0009-9260(17)30120-4/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.03.013.
[26]
AFAT S, WESSLING D, AFAT C, et al. Analysis of a deep learning-based superresolution algorithm tailored to partial Fourier gradient echo sequences of the abdomen at 1.5 T: reduction of breath-hold time and improvement of image quality[J]. Invest Radiol, 2022, 57(3): 157-162. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000825.
[27]
ALMANSOUR H, HERRMANN J, GASSENMAIER S, et al. Combined deep learning-based super-resolution and partial Fourier reconstruction for gradient echo sequences in abdominal MRI at 3 tesla: shortening breath-hold time and improving image sharpness and lesion conspicuity[J/OL]. Acad Radiol, 2022: S1076-S6332(22)00327-0 [2022-09-22]. https://www.academicradiology.org/article/S1076-6332(22)00327-0/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.003.
[28]
HAO W, PENG W J, WANG C Y, et al. Image quality of the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE technique for ultra-fast breast DCE-MRI: comparison with the conventional GRE technique[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2020, 129: 109108 [2022-09-22]. https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(20)30297-7/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109108.
[29]
VREEMANN S, RODRIGUEZ-RUIZ A, NICKEL D, et al. Compressed sensing for breast MRI: resolving the trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution[J]. Invest Radiol, 2017, 52(10): 574-582. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000384.
[30]
OTHMAN A E, MARTIROSIAN P, SCHRAML C, et al. Feasibility of CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(11): 2110-2116. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.013.

PREV A body examination study of brain MRI registration in adolescents using fusion generative adversarial network
NEXT Application of compressed sensing technology in rapid lumbar magnetic resonance imaging
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn