Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Highlights
MR imaging of vulnerable plaque: consensus and challenges
YUAN Chun  ZHAO Xi-hai 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2010.06.007.


[Abstract] It has been shown that MR black-blood vessel wall imaging technique is able to identify and quantify the characteristics of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques, especially for carotid artery. The application of MR technique for early characterizing the critical features of vulnerable plaques will be helpful to prevent the cardiovascular events. Therefore, to promote the application of MR plaque imaging technique clinically is necessary. However, there are still some challenges for MR plaque imaging, such as the limited application in coronary artery and the benefit-cost ratio. This chapter is describing the consensus and challenges of utilizing MR plaque imaging technique.
[Keywords] Magnetic resonance imaging;Atherosclerosis;Vulnerable plaque

YUAN Chun Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Box 357115, 1959 NE Pacific Ave, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Center for BioMedical Imaging Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

ZHAO Xi-hai Center for BioMedical Imaging Research, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

*Correspondence to: Yuan C, E-mail: cyuan@uw.edu

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2010-10-07
Accepted  2010-10-14
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2010.06.007
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2010.06.007.

[1]
Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, et al. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation, 2002, 106(11):1368-1373.
[2]
Cai J, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS, et al. In vivo quantitative measurement of intact fibrous cap and lipid-rich necrotic core size in atherosclerotic carotid plaque: Comparison of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Circulation, 2005, 112(22):3437-3444.
[3]
Saam T, Ferguson MS, Yarnykh VL, et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo mri. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2005, 25(1):234-239.
[4]
Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, et al. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation, 2000, 102(9):959-964.
[5]
Underhill HR, Yuan C, Yarnykh VL, et al. Predictors of surface disruption with mr imaging in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010,31:487-493.
[6]
Underhill HR, Yuan C, Yarnykh VL, et al. Arterial remodeling in [corrected] subclinical carotid artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009, 2(12):1381-1389. DOI: .
[7]
Saam T, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Predictors of carotid atherosclerotic plaque progression as measured by noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis, 2007,194(2):e34-42.
[8]
Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: A prospective assessment with mri--initial results. Stroke, 2006, 37(3):818-823.
[9]
Takaya N, Yuan C, Chu B, et al. Presence of intraplaque hemorrhage stimulates progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: A high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation, 2005, 111(21):2768-2775.
[10]
Yuan C, Zhang SX, Polissar NL, et al. Identification of fibrous cap rupture with magnetic resonance imaging is highly associated with recent transient ischemic attack or stroke. Circulation, 2002, 105(2):181-185.
[11]
Kerwin WS, O'Brien KD, Ferguson MS, et al. Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: A dynamic contrast-enhanced mr imaging study. Radiology, 2006,241(2):459-468.
[12]
Chu B, Zhao XQ, Saam T, et al. Feasibility of in vivo, multicontrast-weighted mr imaging of carotid atherosclerosis for multicenter studies. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005,21(6):809-817.
[13]
Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Yarnykh VL, et al. Reader and platform reproducibility for quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerotic plaque using 1.5t siemens, philips, and general electric scanners. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2007, 26(2):344-352.
[14]
Li F, Yarnykh VL, Hatsukami TS, et al. Scan-rescan reproducibility of carotid atherosclerotic plaque morphology and tissue composition measurements using multicontrast mri at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010,31(1):168-176.
[15]
Saam T, Underhill HR, Chu B, et al. Prevalence of american heart association type vi carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 51(10):1014-1021.
[16]
Underhill HR, Yuan C, Zhao XQ, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on carotid plaque morphology and composition in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients: A high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging trial. Am Heart J, 2008,155(3):584.e1-8..
[17]
Zhao XQ, Phan BA, Chu B, et al. Testing the hypothesis of atherosclerotic plaque lipid depletion during lipid therapy by magnetic resonance imaging: Study design of carotid plaque composition study. Am Heart J, 2007,154(2):239-246.
[18]
Phan BA, Chu B, Polissar N, et al. Association of high-density lipoprotein levels and carotid atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2007, 23(3):337-342.
[19]
Saam T, Cai J, Ma L, et al. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaque features with in vivo mr imaging. Radiology, 2006, 240(2):464-472.
[20]
Underhill HR, Hatsukami TS, et al. A noninvasive imaging approach to assess plaque severity: The carotid atherosclerosis score. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31(6):1068-1075.
[21]
Ward MR, Pasterkamp G, Yeung AC, et al. Arterial remodeling. Mechanisms and clinical implications, Circulation, 2000, 102(10):1186-1191.
[22]
Dong L, Underhill HR, Yu W, et al. Geometric and compositional appearance of atheroma in an angiographically normal carotid artery in patients with atherosclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31(2):311-316.
[23]
Zhao X, Cai J, Underhill H, et al. Prevalence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque composition and surface disruption for different categories of normalized wall index as measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation, 2008, 118:S_688 DOI: .
[24]
Simons PC, Algra A, Eikelboom BC, et al. Carotid artery stenosis in patients with peripheral arterial disease: The smart study. Smart study group. J Vasc Surg, 1999, 30(3):519-525.
[25]
Gerretsen S, Wang J, Maki JH, et al. Reproducible coronary vessel wall imaging at 3T using improved motion sensitized driven equilibrium (IMSDE). ISMRM 2010 in Stockholm.
[26]
Zhang Z, Fan Z, Carroll TJ, et al. Three-dimensional T2-weighted MRI of the human femoral arterial vessel wall at 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol, 2009, 44(9):619-626.
[27]
Liu J, Hong Y, D'Agostino RB, et al. Predictive value for the chinese population of the framingham chd risk assessment tool compared with the chinese multi-provincial cohort study. JAMA, 2004, 291(21):2591-2599.

PREV Current status of MR imaging for vulnerable plaque in clinical application
NEXT The ankle joint: MR sectional anatomy, anatomic variation and pathology. Part II: variation and pathology (coutinuous)
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn