Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]77667
• Original Article •
Study of differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes based on ADC value of MRI diffusion weighted imaging
LI Zhuo  XUE Hua-dan  HE Yong-lan  LEI Jing  JIN Zheng-yu 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2011.05.006.


[Abstract] Objective: To compare clinical value of three different semi-automatic methods in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant rabbit popliteal fossa nodes based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion weighted imaging.Materials and Methods: Twenty-one rabbits were randomly divided into inflammatory and metastatic groups. After popliteal fossa lymph node metastasis model was setted up, MR diffusion weighted imaging was performed. After the scan the lymph nodes were taken for the pathologic diagnosis. The mean ADC of each whole lymph node was compared in the inflammatory and metastatic groups. Three different methods were used for evaluation of lymph nodes based on the ADC map. Method 1: The ADC ratio of cortex vs. medulla (high/low) was calculated; Method 2: Curve of the mean ADC value vs. distance to the node's center, which was manually identified, was generated and slope of the curve was acquired. Method 3: Curve of the mean ADC value vs. distance to the node's morphological skeleton was generated and slope of the curve was acquired. Based on the pathological results, ROC was obtained and AUC was calculated in each procedure.Results: Forty-one lymph nodes were included in the experiment, 22 were metastatic and 19 were inflammatory. The mean ADC value of whole nodes in the two groups was 1.54×10-3 mm2/s vs. 1.42×10-3 mm2/s (P=0.234). The area under the curve (AUC) in the three procedures and the mean of whole node were 0.839 (cortex vs. medulla), 0.775 (to the center), 0.654 (to the skeleton), and 0.583 respectively. And the Youden index were 0.639, 0.517, 0.304, and 0.266.Conclusions: Of the 3 methods, Method 1 showed the best AUC and it might be the best semi-automatic ADC methods for the identification of lymph node malignancy.
[Keywords] Diffusion weighted imaging；Lymph node；Metastasis；Apparent diffusion coefficient；Magnetic resonance imaging

LI Zhuo Radology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

XUE Hua-dan Radology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

HE Yong-lan Radology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

LEI Jing Radology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

JIN Zheng-yu* Radology Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China

*Correspondence to: Jin ZY, E-mail: jin_zhengyu@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2011-08-01
Accepted  2011-09-09
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2011.05.006
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2011.05.006.

[1]
Nagamachi S, Wakamatsu H, Kiyohara S, et al. Comparison of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, 131I-scintigraphy, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for postoperative thyroid cancer. Jpn J Radiol, 2011, 29(6): 413-422.
[2]
Chen W, Jian W, Li HT, et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging vs. FDG-PET for the detection of non-small-cell lung cancer. How do they measure up? Magn Reson Imaging, 2010, 28(5): 613-620.
[3]
Lind P, Kohlfürst S. Respective roles of thyroglobulin, radioiodine imaging, and positron emission tomography in the assessment of thyroid cancer. Semin Nucl Med, 2006, 36(3): 194-205.
[4]
Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 72(3): 381-387.
[5]
Liu Y, Liu H, Bai X, et al. Differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in patients with uterine cervical cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging. Gynecol Oncol, 2011, 122(1): 19-24.
[6]
Fornasa F, Pinali L, Gasparini A, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation. Radiol Med, 2011, 116(2): 264-275.
[7]
Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T, et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24(8): 1627-1634.
[8]
Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol, 2006, 16(7): 1468-1477.
[9]
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing using MATLAB. 2nd edtion. USA: Gatesmark Publishing, 2009: 486-534.
[10]
Deron PB, Bonte KM, Vermeersch HF, et al. Lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary in the upper and middle neck: impact of (18) f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2011, 26(3): 331-334.
[11]
Dighe S, Purkayastha S, Swift I, et al. Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol, 2010, 65(9): 708-719.

PREV The study of both MR diffusion-weighted imaging and expression of VEGF compared with pathology in dog model of liver fibrosis
NEXT Improved visibility of the subthalamic nucleus in PD patients using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a preliminary study
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn