• Clinical Article •
Comparative study of dynamic MRI, mammography, and ultrasonic in the diagnosis of breast lesions
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.02.007.
| [Abstract] Objective: To evaluate the different diagnostic value in breast lesions, especially breast cancer, by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging, mammography, and ultrasonic.Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with 61 breast lesions were studied by dynamic contrast MRI, mammography, and ultrasonic independently before operation. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality were calculated independently and compared among each modality.Results: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound, mammography and contrast enhanced MR imaging were 41.2 %, 84.6 %; 35.3 %, 87.2 %; and 94.1 %, 94.9 %, respectively. There was significant difference on diagnostic accuracy in MR and mammography (χ2=32.378, P=0.000). Ultrasound and mammography showed no diagnostic difference (χ2=0.569, P=0.451).Conclusion: Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI is a more effective diagnostic method in the diagnosis of breast diseases than mammography and ultrasonic. |
| [Keywords] Breast diseases；Magnetic resonance imaging；Mammography；Ultrasound |
CHEN Wen-jing Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Second Hospital of T.C.M, Guangzhou 510095, China
WANG Qing-shan * Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Second Hospital of T.C.M, Guangzhou 510095, China
ZENG Bing Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Second Hospital of T.C.M, Guangzhou 510095, China
WANG Yang Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Second Hospital of T.C.M, Guangzhou 510095, China
LI Xue-zhen Department of Breast Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Second Hospital of T.C.M, Guangzhou 510095, China
*Correspondence to: Wang QS, Email: mjhong313@Yahoo.com.cn
Conflicts of interest None.
| Received 2011-09-19 |
| Accepted 2011-12-20 |
| DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.02.007 |
| DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.02.007. |
[1]
Funke M, Villena C. Breast cancer imaging. Radiologe, 2008, 48(6): 601-613.
[2]
Mossa-Basha M, Fundaro GM, Shah BA, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics, 2010, 30(6): 1673-1687.
[3]
Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, et al. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 186(6): 1723-1732.
[4]
Narisada H, Aoki T, Sasaguri T, et al. Correlation between numeric gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI ratios and prognostic factors and histologic type of breast carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 187(2): 297-306.
[5]
付荣，邱大胜，刘玉林, 等. 乳腺癌术前MRI评估胸肌侵犯的价值. 放射学实践, 2007, 22(11): 1151-1153.
[6]
Olaya W, Bae W, Wong J, et al. Are percutaneous biopsy rates a reasonable quality measure in breast cancer management? Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17(Suppl 3): 268-272.
[7]
周纯武，张仁知. MRI随访在乳腺癌诊断和疗效评估中的价值. 磁共振成像, 2011, 2(3): 166-171.
[8]
汪晓红，彭卫军，杨文涛, 等. 乳腺纤维腺瘤的MRI表现及病理对照. 中华放射学杂志, 2007, 41(5): 467-471.
[9]
郭建锋，李刚，张利平, 等. 数字化乳腺摄影联合超声与MRI对乳腺良、恶性疾病诊断的对照观察. 中国介入影像与治疗学, 2011, 8(1): 50-53.
