Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]778576
• Clinical Article •
Different b-value diffusion weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflamation
WU Guang-yu  LU Qing  XU Jian-rong 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.06.009.


[Abstract] Objective: To investigate the value of ADC derived from different b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflamation.Materials and Methods: Twenty four patients with upper urinary tract tumor (malignant group) and 14 patients with non-specific inflamation (inflamation group) underwent DWI with different b value on a 3 T MR imaging scanner. The ADC values and SNR among different b factors were measured respectively and analyzed statistically, ADC value of upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflamation was compared using Mann-Whitney U test, ADC value derived from different b value was compared using Friedman analysis and SNR of DWI with different b value was compared using ANOVA test.Results: When ADC was derived from DWI with b value of 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 s/mm2, the mean ADC value of malignant group was (1.70±0.40), (1.46±0.36, (1.21±0.28), (1.04±0.21)×10-3 mm2/s, the mean ADC value of inflamation group was (2.47±0.83),(1.99±0.49), (1.76±0.43), (1.49±0.36)×10-3 mm2/s. An increase in b-value was associated with a decrease in ADC value in upper urinary tract cancer as well as in non-specific inflamation. The ADC value of upper urinary tract cancer was significantly lower than that of non-specific inflamation. The result of ROC analysis shows the differential abilitiy of b=1500, 2000 s/mm2 was significantly higher than b=500, 1000 s/mm2 and there was no obvious different both in b=2000 vs b=1500 s/mm2 and b=1000 vs b=500 s/mm2. The SNR of DWI was decreased with the increasing of b value. The most optimal b-value in dfferential diagnosis was observed with b=1500 s/mm2, the cut off value was 1.42×10-3 mm2/s, the sensitivity of differential diagnosis was 78.6% and the specificity was 79.2%.Conclusion: DWI with b=1500 s/mm2 is of promising value in differential diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer and non-specific inflammation.
[Keywords] Urologic neoplasms；Inflammation；Magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion

WU Guang-yu# Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Medical College of Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200032, China

LU Qing# Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Medical College of Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200032, China

XU Jian-rong * Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, Medical College of Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200032, China

#Both authors contributed equally to this work

*Correspondence to: Xu JR, E-mail: xujianr@hotmail.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2012-05-02
Accepted  2012-07-02
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.06.009
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2012.06.009.

[1]
Vikram R, Sandler CM, Ng CS. Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma: Part 2, upper urinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009, 192(6): 1488-1493.
[2]
Wang J, Wang H, Tang G, et al. Transitional cell carcinoma of upper urinary tract vs. benign lesions: distinctive MSCT features. Abdom Imaging, 2009, 34 (1): 94-106.
[3]
Schustor JG, Hollen Beck, Faerber GJ, et al. Complications of ureteroscopy analysis of predictive factors. J Urol, 2001, 166(2): 538-540.
[4]
Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011, 196(1): 110-116.
[5]
Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, et al. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics, 2008, 28(7): 1983-1998.
[6]
余松林. 医学统计学. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 164-178.
[7]
Anderson EM, Murphy R, Rennie AT, et al. Multidetector computed tomography urography (MDCTU) for diagnosing urothelial malignancy. Clin Radiol, 2007, 62(4): 324-332.
[8]
Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Inampudi P, et al. MDCT urography of upper tract urothelial neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 184(6): 1873-1881.
[9]
Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia, 2009, 11(2): 102-125.
[10]
Lee SS, Byun JH, Park BJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas: usefulness in characterizing solid pancreatic masses. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008, 28(4): 928-936.
[11]
Fornasa F. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: what makes water run fast or slow? J Clin Imaging Sci, 2011, 1:27.
[12]
Tomar V, Yadav A, Rathore RS, et al. Apparent. Diffusion coefficient with higher b-value correlates better with viable cell count quantified from the cavity of brain abscess. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2011, 32(11): 2120-2125.

PREV Comparison study on differentiating active from remissive Crohn,s disease by 3.0 T and 1.0 T MRI
NEXT Liver iron quantification by 3.0 T MRI: calibration on a rabbit model
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn