Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]89072
• Review •
Current status of MR colonography
YU Qiong  WANG Fu-rong  ZHANG Hui-mao 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2013.02.015.


[Abstract] In this article, we discuss MR colonography in terms of techniques and indications, imaging findings, consensus on its current role, and future developments and research directions. MR colonography is useful for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
[Keywords] Magnetic resonance imaging；Colon；Rectum；Colorectal neoplasms

YU Qiong China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China

WANG Fu-rong China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China

ZHANG Hui-mao* China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130033, China

*Correspondence to: Zhang HM, E-mail: lhuimaozhanglinda@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2012-04-28
Accepted  2012-08-29
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2013.02.015
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2013.02.015.

[1]
Morson BC. The evolution of colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radio, 1984, 35(6): 425-431.
[2]
Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet, 1997, 349(9061): 1288-1291.
[3]
Elwood JM, Ali G, Schlup MM, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy for colorectal screening:a randomized trial of performance and acceptability. Cancer Detect Prev, 1995, 19(4): 337-347.
[4]
Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, et al. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology, 2002, 223(1): 248-254.
[5]
Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging, 2005, 30(5): 576-583.
[6]
Rodríguez-Gomez S, Pagés Llinas M, Castells Garangou A, et al. Dark-lumen MR colonography with fecal tagging: a comparison of water enema and air methods of colonic distension for detecting colonic neoplasms. Eur Radiol, 2008, 18(7): 1396-1405.
[7]
Kuehle CA, Langhorst J, Ladd SC, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing: a prospective cross sectional study in a screening population. Gut, 2007, 56(8): 1079-1085.
[8]
Kinner S, Lauenstein TC. MR colonography. Radiol Clin North Am, 2007, 45(2): 377-387.
[9]
Geenen RW, Hussain SM, Cademartiri F, et al. CT and MR colonography: scanning techniques, postprocessing, and emphasis on polyp detection. RadioGraphics, 2004, 24 (1): e18.
[10]
Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogan MT, et al. CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(3): 525-530.
[11]
Rogalla P, Lembcke A, Rückert JC, et al. Spasmol-ysis at CT colonography: butyl scopolamine versus glucagon. Radiology, 2005, 236(1): 184-188.
[12]
Lomas DJ, Sood RR, Graves MJ, et al. Colon carcinoma: MR imaging with CO2 enema: pilot study. Radiology, 2001, 219(2): 558-562.
[13]
Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ. Colonography: current status, research directions and challengesupdate 2002. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(3): 502-524.
[14]
Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology, 2000, 216(2): 383-388.
[15]
Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR, 2001, 22(5): 443-453.
[16]
Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC. Virtual magnetic resonance colonography. Gut, 2003, 52(suppl 4): S7-S22.
[17]
Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, et al. MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 176(1): 144-146.
[18]
Zhang S, Peng JW, Shi QY, et al. Colorectal neoplasm: magnetic resonance colonography with fat enema: initial clinical experience. World J Gastroenterol, 2007, 13(40): 5371-5375.
[19]
Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. MR colonography: how does air compare to water for colonic distention. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 19(2): 216-221.
[20]
Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, et al. Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology, 2000, 217(3): 765-771.
[21]
Abujudeh HH, Kaewlai R, Kagan A, et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis after gadopentetate dimeglumine exposure: case series of 36 patients. Radiology, 2009, 253(1): 81-89.
[22]
Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Radiology, 2005, 234(2): 452-459.
[23]
Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Pelster G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography for the detection of inflammatory diseases of the large bowel: quantifying the inflammatory activity. Gut, 2005, 54(2): 257-263.
[24]
Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. Compari-son of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut, 2005, 54(2): 250-256.
[25]
Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Lauenstein T, et al. Dark-lumen magnetic resonance colonography in patients with suspected sigmoid diverticulitis: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15(11): 2316-2322.
[26]
Ajaj W, Goyen M, Langhorst J, et al. MR colonography for the assessment of colonic anastomoses. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006, 24(1): 101-107.
[27]
Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Haug A, et al. Whole body MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T compared with FDG-PET-CT for the detection of tumour recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol, 2009, 19 (6): 1366-1378.
[28]
Haykir R, Karakose S, Karabacakoglu A, et al. Three-dimensional MR and axial CT colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for detection of colon pathologies. World J Gastroenterol, 2006, 12(15): 2345-2350.
[29]
Saar B, Rösch T, Rummeny EJ. Colorectal cancer screening: a challenge for magnetic resonance colonography. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 13(6): 427-434.
[30]
Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology, 2005, 236(1): 3-9.
[31]
Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conven-tional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic en-doluminal lesions. Gastroenterology, 2000, 119(2): 300-304.
[32]
Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut, 2003, 52(12): 1738-1743.
[33]
Lauenstein TC, Ajaj W, Kuehle CA, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography: comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional vibe with two-dimensional FISP sequences: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol, 2005, 40(2): 89-96.
[34]
Ajaj W, Ruehm SG, Gerken G, et al. Strengths and weaknesses of dark-lumen MR colonography: clinical relevance of polyps smaller than 5 mm in diameter at the moment of their detection. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006, 24(5): 1088-1094.
[35]
Röttgen R, Herzog H, Bogen P, et al. MR colonoscopy at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T in vivo and a colon model. Clin Imaging, 2006, 30(4): 248-253.
[36]
Florie J, Birnie E, van Gelder RE, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation: patient acceptance compared with that of full-preparation colonoscopy. Radiology, 2007, 245(1): 150-159.
[37]
Florie J, Jensch S, Nievelstein RA, et al. MR colonography with limited bowel preparation compared with optical colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiology, 2007, 243(1): 122-131.
[38]
Ajaj W, Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography without bowel cleansing using oral and rectal stool softeners (fecal cracking): a feasibility study. Eur Radiol, 2005, 15(10): 2079-2087.

PREV Current status of magnetization transfer imaging in nervous system diseases
NEXT Progress of breast imaging in Radiological Society of North America 2012
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn