Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]9274
• Editorial •
The clinical application of intraoperative MRI
FENG Xiao-yuan  PANG Hao-peng 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2014.05.S1.002.


[Abstract] Neuro-surgical operator can realize the brain shifting in real time, due to the real-time and dynamic feedback of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during an operation. Comparing with routine MRI, iMRI has advantages of decreasing residual tumor, improving the ratio of gross total resection, extending the patients’ live time, increasing precision of biopsy MRI in the application of neurospongoma resection, invasive pituitary resection and biopsy. With the development of morphologic and functional image fusion technology, giving consideration to the two things become possible on functional protection and neurospongoma resection in functional region. By the benefits of real-time navigation technology based on function MRI, the iMRI information were further expanded and gotten a clinical confirmation in multimodal imaging technology and their corresponding parts of information in anatomy, pathology and metabolism.
[Keywords] Magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative；Clinical application；Progress

FENG Xiao-yuan * Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

PANG Hao-peng Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

*Correspondence to: Feng XY, E-mail: cjr.fengxiaoyuan@vip.163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2014-08-24
Accepted  2014-09-25
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2014.05.S1.002
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2014.05.S1.002.

[1]
Alexander E 3rd, Moriarty TM, Kikinis R, et al. Innovations in minimalism: intraoperative MRI. Clin Neurosurg, 1996, 43:338-352.
[2]
Xiao S, Jing-Song W. Intraoperative MRI technology: present states and perspectives. Chin J Neurosurg, 2010, 26(4):373-375.
[3]
Bernays RL, Kollias SS, Khan N, et al. Histological yield, complications, and technological considerations in 114 consecutive frameless stereotactic biopsy procedures aided by open intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg, 2002, 97(2):354-362.
[4]
Roder C, Bisdas S, Ebner FH, et al. Maximizing the extent of resection and survival benefit of patients in glioblastoma surgery: high-field iMRI versus conventional and 5-ALA-assisted surgery. Eur J SurgOncol, 2014, 40(3):297-304.
[5]
Mehdorn HM, Schwartz F, Dawirs S, et al. High-field iMRI in glioblastoma surgery: improvement of resection radicality and survival for the patient?. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2011, 109:103-106. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_16.
[6]
Senft C, Bink A, Heckelmann M, et al. Glioma extent of resection and ultra-low-field iMRI: interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2011, 109:49-53.
[7]
Senft C, Franz K, Blasel S, et al. Influence of iMRI-guidance on the extent of resection and survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Technol Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 9(4):339-346.
[8]
Jing-Song W, Ying M, Chen-Jun Y, et al. Preliminary application of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery: experience with 61 cases. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, 2007, 12(3):105-109.
[9]
Jin-Song W, Feng-Ping Z, Dong-Xiao Z, et al. Preliminary application of 3.0 T intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging neuronavigation system in China. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2011, 49(8):683-687.
[10]
Yan Z, Xiao-Lei C, Yan Z, et al. The use of high-field intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging combined with language functional neuronavigation in glioma surgery. Medical Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2011, 36(7):697-700.
[11]
Paterno' V, Fahlbusch R. High-Field iMRI in transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery with special respect to typical localization of residual tumor. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2014, 156(3):463-474.
[12]
Pergolizzi RJ, Nabavi A, Schwartz RB, et al. Intra-operative MR guidance during trans-sphenoidal pituitary resection: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001, 13(1):136-141.
[13]
Tanei T, Nagatani T, Nakahara N, et al. Use of high-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary microadenomas and small adenomas located in the intrasellar region. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2013, 53(7):501-510.
[14]
Bohinski RJ, Warnick RE, Gaskill-Shipley MF, et al. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to determine the extent of resection of pituitary macroadenomas during transsphenoidal microsurgery. Neurosurgery, 2001, 49(5):1133-1143. DOI: .
[15]
Xiao-Dong Z, Jin-Song W, Cheng-Jun Y, et al. Application of low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in transsphenoidal pituitary macroadenomas resection. Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery, 2010, 26(4):291-294.
[16]
Lu Y, Yeung C, Radmanesh A, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Frame-based, Frameless and Intraoperative MRI Guided Brain Biopsy Techniques. World Neurosurgery, 2014, DOI: . DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.043. [ DOI: ].
[17]
Tsuda K, Ishikawa E, Zaboronok A, et al. Navigation-guided endoscopic biopsy for intraparenchymal brain tumor. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2011, 51(10):694-700.
[18]
Amin DV, Lozanne K, Parry PV, et al. Image-guided frameless stereotactic needle biopsy in awake patients without the use of rigid head fixation. J Neurosurg, 2011,114(5):1414-1420.
[19]
Lehericy S, Duffau H, Cornu P, et al. Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopy and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg, 2000, 92(4):589-598.
[20]
Rutten GJ, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, et al. Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol for intraoperative localization of critical temporoparietal language areas. Ann Neurol, 2002, 51(3):350-360.
[21]
Lurito JT, Lowe MJ, Sartorius C, et al. Comparison of fMRI and intraoperative direct cortical stimulation in localization of receptive language areas. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2000, 24(1):99-105.
[22]
Nimsky C. Intraoperative acquisition of fMRI and DTI. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2011, 22(2):269-277.
[23]
Wu JS, Zhou LF, Tang WJ, et al. Clinical evaluation and follow-up outcome of diffusion tensor imaging-based functional neuronavigation: a prospective, controlled study in patients with gliomas involving pyramidal tracts. Neurosurgery, 2007, 61(5):935-948, 948-949.
[24]
Nachimuthu DS, Baladhandapani A. Multidimensional Texture Characterization: On Analysis for Brain Tumor Tissues Using MRS and MRI. Journal of Digital Imaging, 2014, 27(4):496-506.
[25]
Garcia-Gomez JM, Tortajada S, Vidal C, et al. The effect of combining two echo times in automatic brain tumor classification by MRS. NMR Biomed, 2008, 21(10):1112-1125.
[26]
Ganslandt O, Stadlbauer A, Fahlbusch R, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging integrated into image-guided surgery: correlation to standard magnetic resonance imaging and tumor cell density. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56(2Suppl):291-298, 291-298.

PREV To establish an authoritative academic exchange platform, promote the development of MRI technology in China
NEXT Applications and advances of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing liver disease
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn