Share:
Share this content in WeChat
X
Clinical Article
The application of conventional MRI, DWI and DCEI in focal liver lesions
ZHOU Ting-ting  WANG Jian-liang  YANG Yi  ZHAO Wen-lu  SHEN Jun-kang 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.01.007.


[Abstract] Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of conventional respiratory triggered T2WI, DWI and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging sequences in the evaluation of focal liver lesions (FLLs).Materials and Methods: We collected liver MRI data of twenty-three patients from 2011.9 to 2013.1. Two observers reviewed T2WI, DWI and DCEI for FLLs detection and characterization, then compared T2WI, DWI, DCEI and DCEI combined with DWI for FLLs detection. The reviewers then characterized each detected lesion using a 5-point scale, the sensitivity, specificity and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for the detection of liver lesions were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.Results: Overall detection rate was equal for T2WI, DWI and DCEI, but ≤5 mm lesions detection rate was lower for DWI (44.44%) versus T2-weighted imaging (66.67%) (P=0.004). Overall detection rate of DCEI combined with DWI (100%) was significantly higher than T2WI (87.14%), DWI (88.57%) and DCEI (87.14%) alone (P≤0.006). Benign and ≤5 mm lesions detection rate are higher for DCEI combined with DWI (100%、100%)versus DWI (87.23%、44.44%) (P≤0.029). There was no significant difference between the three image sets (T2WI, DWI, DCEI) in the detection of FLLs with regards to Az (≥0.075). However, the Az values of DCEI combined with DWI (0.982) was significantly higher than those of DWI (0.886) and T2WI (0.858) (P≤0.0199).Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of DCEI and DWI is equal to conventional respiratory triggered T2WI. Combination of DCEI and DWI increases the lesions detection and diagnostic performance.
[Keywords] Liver neoplasms;Magnetic resonance imaging

ZHOU Ting-ting Department of Radiology, the First People’s Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou 215300, China

WANG Jian-liang* Department of Radiology, the First People’s Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou 215300, China

YANG Yi Department of Image, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Suzhou University, Suzhou 215004, China

ZHAO Wen-lu Department of Image, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Suzhou University, Suzhou 215004, China

SHEN Jun-kang Department of Image, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Suzhou University, Suzhou 215004, China

*Correspondence to: Wang JL, Email: wjlks@sina.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2014-08-07
Accepted  2014-09-30
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.01.007
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.01.007.

[1]
Holzapfel K, Eiber MJ, Fingerle AA, et al. Konstantin H, Matthias JE, Alexander AF, et al. Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods. Abdom Imaging, 2012, 37(1): 74-82.
[2]
Kenis C, Deckers F, De Foer B, Van Mieghem F, Van Laere S, Pouillon M. Diagnosis of liver metastases: can diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) be used as a stand alone sequence? Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(5): 1016-1023.
[3]
Schima W, Saini S, Echeverri JA, et al. Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 1997, 202(2): 389-93.
[4]
Choi SA, Lee SS, Jung IH, et a1. The effect ofgadoxetic acid enhancement on lesion detection and characterization using T2 weighted imaging and diffusion weighted imaging of the liver. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(1009): 29-36.
[5]
Kim YK, Lee JM, Kim CS. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(1): 5-13.
[6]
Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology, 2010, 254(1): 47-66.
[7]
陈鑫,梁长虹,刘再毅.磁共振扩散加权成像在肝脏中的应用.磁共振成像, 2013, 4(1): 76-80.
[8]
Kim SY, Lee SS, Byun JH, et a1. Malignant hepatic tumors: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology, 2010, 255(3): 815-823.
[9]
Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal Liver Lesion Detection and Characterization with Diffusion weighted MR Imaging: Comparison with Standard Breath-hold T2-weighted Imaging. Radiology, 2008, 246(3): 812-822.
[10]
Morana G, Grazioli L, Testoni M, et al. Contrast agents for hepatic magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2002, 13(3): 117-150.
[11]
Kwee TC, Takahara T. Diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting liver metastases: importance of the b-value. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(1): 150.
[12]
Taouli B. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for liver lesion characterization: a critical look. Radiology, 2012, 262(2): 378-380.
[13]
刘伟,杨军,邵康伟,等.扩散加权成像b值大小对肝脏良恶性病变的鉴别诊断价值.磁共振成像, 2011, 2 (4): 283-289.
[14]
Sandrasegaran K, Akisik FM, Lin C, et al. The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in characterizing focal liver masses. Acad Radiol, 2009, 16 (10): 1208-1214.
[15]
Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted im-aging. Radiology, 2008, 246 (3): 812-822.
[16]
Kim YK, Kim CS, Han YM, et a1. Detection of liver malignancy with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: is addition of diffusion-weighted MRI beneficial? Clin Radiol, 2011, 66(6): 489-496.

PREV The evaluation of the infiltration range of breast cancer tissue in vitro using 7.0 T MRI: a comparative study between MRI and histological examination
NEXT Image features and pathological manifestations of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of abdominal-pevic and review of literature
  



Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn