Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]85672
• DCE-MRI Quantitative Technique Subject •
Quantitative diagnostic value of 3.0 T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in different diagnosis of prostate cancer and hyperplasia
XU Yan  LENG Xiao-ming  ZHENG Yun  ZHAO Man  ZENG Dao-hui  HAN Xiao-rui  FENG Xin  WANG Xiao-chun 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.08.010.


[Abstract] Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of quantitative analysis parameters of DCE-MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis, and to evaluate the correlation between Ktrans, Kep and Ve and Gleason scores.Materials and Methods: Forty-three prostate diseases patients pathologically proved underwent conventional MRI and DCE-MRI examinations, including 27 patients with prostate cancer and 16 with prostate hyperplasia. The variations of the value of Ktrans, Kep and Ve between the prostate cancer and hyperplastic tissues were measured and compared, and the correlations between Ktrans, Kep and Ve and Gleason scores were studied.Results: The Ktrans, Kep and Ve values of cancerous area were (0.312±0.085) min-1, (0.818±0.098) min-1 and (0.379±0.031), while, for hyperplastic area were (0.213±0.046) min-1, (0.537±0.076) min-1 and (0.324±0.034). The values of Ktrans, Kep, Ve were significantly higher in prostate cancer than in hyperplastic tissues; and Ktrans, Kep, Ve values were not relevant with Gleason score.Conclusion: DCE-MRI quantitative analysis plays a significant role in prostate cancer diagnosis, and may help in differential diagnosis of prostate tumors. Ktrans, Kep and Ve values were not relevant with Gleason score.
[Keywords] Prostate neoplasms；Benign prostatic hyperplasia；Dynamic contrast-enhanced；Magnetic resonance imaging

XU Yan Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

LENG Xiao-ming* Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

ZHENG Yun Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

ZHAO Man Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

ZENG Dao-hui Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

HAN Xiao-rui Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

FENG Xin Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

WANG Xiao-chun Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China

*Corresponding author: Leng XM, E-mail: xmleng@hotmail.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2015-05-30
Accepted  2015-06-28
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.08.010
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.08.010.

[1]
景国东，汪剑，陈录广，等. 3.0 T动态增强MRI在前列腺癌诊断中的价值．放射学实践, 2014, 29(5): 482-486.
[2]
Shimizu T, Nishie A, Ro T, et al. Prostate cancer detection:the value of performing an MRI before a biopsy. Acta Radiol, 2009, 50(9): 1080-1088.
[3]
张学琴，王霄英，陆健，等．前列腺中央腺体偶发癌的MRI初步研究．磁共振成像, 2010, 1(4): 264-267.
[4]
张娜，陈敏，刘新．功能磁共振成像无创性诊断前列腺癌的研究进展．磁共振成像, 2010, 1(4): 313-316.
[5]
Jackson AS, Reinsberg SA, Sohaib SA. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization. Br J Radiol, 2009, 82(974): 148-156.
[6]
Kim JK, Hong SS, Choi YJ, et al. Wash-in rate on the basis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: usefulness for prostate cancer detection and localization. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 22(5): 639-646.
[7]
Bonekamp D, Macura KJ, Russell H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the prostate. Topic in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008, 19(6): 273-284.
[8]
Kozlowski P, Chang SD, Meng R, et al. Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T-quantitative correlation with biopsy. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010, 28(5): 621-628.
[9]
van Niekerk CG, van der Laak JA, Hambrock T, et al. Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative histopathologic microvascular parametersin organ-confined prostate cancer. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(10): 2597-2605.
[10]
Langer DL, van der Kwast TH, Evans AJ, et al. Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI:logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2,diffusion-weighted imaging,and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 30(2): 327-334.
[11]
Jackson AS, Reinsberg SA, Sohaib SA, et al. Dynamic contraster-damaced MRI for prostate cancer locatation. Br J Radiol, 2009, 82(974): 148-156.
[12]
Cornud F, Beuvon F, Thevenin F, et al. Quantitative dynamic MRI and localization of non-palpable prostate cancer. Prof Urol, 2009, 19: 401-413.
[13]
Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJ, et al. Discrimination of protate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central glandtissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology, 2003, 229(1): 248-254.
[14]
Wang L, Mazaheri Y, Zhang J, et al. Assessment of biologic aggressiveness of prostate cancer:correlation of MR signal intensity with Gleason grade after radical prostatectomy. Radiology, 2008, 246(1): 168-176.
[15]
Bigler SA, Deering RE, Brawer MR. Comparison of microscoric vascularity in benign and malignant prostate tissue. Hum pathol, 1993, 24(2): 220-226.

PREV The preliminary value of DCE-MRI quantitative parameters in high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation,s immediate effect for uterine fibroids
NEXT Correlation of contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI imaging semi-quantitative parameters with tumor tissue hypoxia and intravascular generate
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn