Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]71094
• Clinical Article •
A study on the best fitting model for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal prostate tissue at different b-values
ZHI De-bo  QIU Ben-sheng 

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.08.015.


[Abstract] Objective: To compare the fitting behavior of biexponential diffusion model and diffusion kurtosis model (DKI) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of healthy prostate at different b-values at 1.5 T.Materials and Methods: T2-weighted imaging and DWI of prostate was performed on 11 healthy man with 31 b-values ranging from 0 to 3000 s/mm2. The DWI signals were fitted into two diffusion models. The continuous b-values with smaller deviation between the signal intensities of fitted curves of one model and the acquired original data can be combined into one section. The best fitting model could be selected for the b-values sections.Results: The adjusted R2 of the full b-values for biexponential diffusion model was bigger than that for DKI. The RMSE of DKI was smaller than biexponential model with b-values from 500 to 1000 s/mm2, and the RMSE of biexponential diffusion model was smaller than DKI with b-values ranging from 0 to 500 s/mm2 and from 1000 to 3000 s/mm2.Conclusion: For DWI of prostate, biexponential diffusion model and DKI behaviors diversely on the goodness of fitting at different b-values. The different b-values sections can be fitted best with different diffusion models. It may potentially provide more help for clinical diagnosis when combining the biexponential diffusion model and DKI.
[Keywords] Biexponential diffusion model；Diffusion kurtosis model；Prostate；Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging；Magnetic resonance imaging

ZHI De-bo Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

QIU Ben-sheng* Center for Biomedical Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

*Corresponding author: Qiu BS, E-mail: bqiu@ustc.edu.cn

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2015-04-29
Accepted  2015-06-10
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.08.015
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2015.08.015.

[1]
Mazaheri Y, Shukla-Dave A, Muellner A, et al. MR imaging of the prostate in clinical practice.Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine, 2008, 21(6): 379-392.
[2]
陈爱萍，李惠民，于红，等．表观扩散系数与非小细胞肺癌病理基础初探．磁共振成像, 2014, 5(1): 40-44.
[3]
Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1965, 42(1): 288-292.
[4]
Quentin M, Blondin D, Klasen J, et al. Comparison of different mathematical models of diffusion-weighted prostate MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 30(10): 1468-1474.
[5]
Yuan J, Yeung DK, Mok GS, et al. Non-Gaussian analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in head and neck at 3T: a pilot study in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87024.
[6]
Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 27(3): 355-359.
[7]
Liu X, Peng W, Zhou L, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients values in the prostate: comparison among normal tissue, prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis. Korean J Radiol, 2013, 14(2): 222-232.
[8]
Mulkern RV, Barnes AS, Haker SJ, et al. Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging, 2006, 24(5): 563-568.
[9]
Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005, 53(6): 1432-1440.
[10]
张荷焕，穆学涛，王宏. 3.0 T MR扩散加权成像对泪腺上皮性肿瘤的诊断价值．磁共振成像, 2014, 5(3): 182-188.
[11]
Garcia Santos JM, Ordonez C, Torres del Rio S.ADC measurements at low and high b values: insight into normal brain structure with clinical DWI. Magn Reson Imaging, 2008, 26(1): 35-44.
[12]
Kitajima K, Takahashi S, Ueno Y, et al. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm2) and standard high b-value 1000 s/mm2). J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 36(1): 198-205.
[13]
Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B. High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3.0 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2010, 194(1): W33-W37.
[14]
Blackledge MD, Leach MO, Collins DJ, et al. Computed Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging May Improve Tumor Detection. Radiology, 2011, 261(2): 573-581.
[15]
Rosenkrantz AB, Chandarana H, Hindman N, et al. Computed diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3.0 T: impact on image quality and tumour detection. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(11): 3170-3177.
[16]
丁玖乐，邢伟，陈杰，等，肾透明细胞癌多b值DWI的单指数函数与双指数函数分析比较．磁共振成像, 2013, 4(4): 266-270.
[17]
Jansen JF, Stambuk HE, Koutcher JA, et al. Non-gaussian analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2010, 31(4): 741-748.
[18]
Liu C, Liang C, Liu Z, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(12): e782-789.
[19]
Tamura T, Usui S, Murakami S, et al. Comparisons of multi b-value DWI signal analysis with pathological specimen of breast cancer. Magn Reson Med, 2012, 68(3): 890-897.
[20]
Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, et al. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Radiology, 2012, 264(1): 126-135.

PREV The preliminary study of role of multi-echo GRE Dixon in the diagnosis of primary hepatocarcinoma
NEXT Study of region-of-interest choosing in measuring brain iron content by susceptibility weighted imaging
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn