Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]107299
• Technical Article •
A comparative study on the evaluation of cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction using compressed sensing cardiac cine imaging compared with traditional cardiac cine imaging
YANG Xinying  ZHONG Jiali  PENG Ruchen  GUO Xiaobin  YU Bin 

Cite this article as: Yang XY, Zhong JL Peng RC, et al. A comparative study on the evaluation of cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction using compressed sensing cardiac cine imaging compared with traditional cardiac cine imaging[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(3): 49-53, 58. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.03.011.


[Abstract] Objective To investigate the advantage and value of compressed sensing cardiac cine imaging compared with traditional cardiac cine imaging in evaluation of cardiac function after acute myocardial infarction. Materials andMethods Thirty patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were scanned with United imaging UMR 780 3.0 T MRI, the uCS-Cine sequence based on compressed sensing technology, and the traditional sequence based on balanced steady-state free precession cardiac cine sequence (standard-Cine). The 8-slice images covered the apex to the bottom of the heart. The uCS-Cine whole heart scan was completed by one breath holding. Scanning parameters: slice thickness 8mm, interval 4 mm, TR/TE=2.73/1.36 ms, TA=12.7 s. The standard-Cine was performed with 8 breath holding. Scanning parameters: slice thickness 8 mm, interval 4 mm, TR/TE=2.82/1.30 ms, TA=150 s. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of cardiac muscle, and the display of anatomical structures, artifacts and whether they could meet the needs of diagnosis on 8 layers (apex as the first layer and bottom as the eighth layer). The cardiac function of the two sequences was analyzed by uWS-780 workstation. The results were evaluated by SPSS 21.0 software by paired rank sum test.Results The results of cardiac function analysis of 30 patients showed that there was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV) between uCS-Cine and standard-Cine sequences (P＞0.05), while the standard-Cine of left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) was slightly larger than that of uCS-Cine (P＜0.05). In terms of the objective score of image quality, the SNR of cardiac muscle of standard-Cine in slice1-slice 8 was higher than that in uCS-Cine (P＜0.05), and in terms of subjective image quality score, compared with standard-Cine sequence, 8-layer short axis images covered from apex to bottom of heart. At slice1-slice6 level, image quality score was not statistically significant (P＞0.05), while in slice7-slice8 level, the subjective score of traditional standard-Cine was better than that of uCS-Cine, and the results were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusions Compared with the conventional standard-Cine, the uCS-Cine based on compressed sensing technology has no significant difference in heart function analysis and subjective score of image quality, and can greatly shorten the examination time, improve the success rate of examination, and has high clinical application value.
[Keywords] cardiac cine imaging；cardiac function analysis；compressed sensing；magnetic resonance imaging；acute myocardial infarction

YANG Xinying   ZHONG Jiali   PENG Ruchen*   GUO Xiaobin   YU Bin  

Department of Radiology, Beijing LuHe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China

Peng RC, E-mail: 13501271260@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2020-09-29
Accepted  2021-01-21
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.03.011
Cite this article as: Yang XY, Zhong JL Peng RC, et al. A comparative study on the evaluation of cardiac function in patients with acute myocardial infarction using compressed sensing cardiac cine imaging compared with traditional cardiac cine imaging[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(3): 49-53, 58. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.03.011.

1
Curtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, et al. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2003, 42(4): 736-742. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00789-7
2
Gharib MI, Burnett AK. Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: current practice and prospects of prophylaxis. Eur J Heart Fail, 2014, 4(3): 235-242. DOI: 10.1016/S1388-9842(01)00201-X
3
Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults. Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 53(15): e1-e90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.013
4
Yang Q. Expert consensus on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of China. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2019, 35(2): 161-169. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.201810056
5
Zhang GS, Xiao G, Dai ZZ, et al. Compressed sensing technology and its application in MRI. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 4(4): 314-320. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8034.2013.04.016
6
Kutyniok G. Compressed sensing: theory and applications. Corr, 2011, 52(4): 1289-1306. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511794308
7
Akcakaya M, Basha TA, Chan RH, et al. Accelerated isotropic submillimeter whole-heart coronary MRI: compressed sensing versus parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2014, 71(2): 815-822. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24683
8
Allen BD , Carr M , Botelho MPF, et al. Highly accelerated cardiac MRI using iterative SENSE reconstruction: initial clinical experience. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 32(6): 955-963. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0859-3
9
Bogachkov A, Ayache JB, Allen BD, et al. Right ventricular assessment at cardiac MRI: initial clinical experience utilizing an IS-SENSE reconstruction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2016, 32(7): 1081-1091. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0874-4
10
Camargo GC, Erthal F, Sabioni, et al. Real-time cardiac magnetic resonance cine imaging with sparse sampling and iterative reconstruction for left-ventricular measures comparison with gold- standard segmented steady-state free precession. Magn Reson imaging, 2017, 38: 138-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.01.002
11
Goebel J, Nensa F, Bomas B et al. Real-time SPARSE-SENSE cardiac cine MR imaging: optimization of image reconstruction and sequence validation. Eur Radiol, 2016, 26(12): 4482-4489. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4301-y
12
Sudarski S, Henzler T, Haubenreisser H, et al. Free-breathing sparse sampling cine MR imaging with iterative reconstruction for the assessment of left ventricular function and mass at 3.0 T. Radiology, 2017, 282(1): 74-83. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151002
13
Li S, Lu MJ, Zhao SH, et al. Compressed sensing and its application in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018, 9(4): 68-71. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2018.04.012
14
Lin ACW, Strugnell W, Riley R, et al. Higher resolution cine imaging with compressed sensing for accelerated clinical left ventricular evaluation. J Magn Reson Imag, 2017, 45(6): 1693-1699. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25525
15
Muthurangu V, Lurz P, Critchely JD, et al. Real-time assessment of right congenital and left ventricular volumes and function heart disease by using high spatiotemporal resolution radial k-t SENSE. J Cardiovasc Magn R, 2008, 248(3): 782-791. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-S1-A243
16
Kido T, Kido T, Nakamura M, et al. Compressed sensing real-time cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: accurate assessment of left ventricular function in a single-breath-hold. Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2016, 18(1): 50. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0271-0
17
Vincenti G, Monney P, Chaptinel J, et al. Compressed sensing single- breath-hold CMR for fast quantification of LV function, volumes, and mass. JACC Cardiovasc Imag, 2014, 7(9):882-892. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.04.016
18
Ma Y, Hou Y, Ma Q, et al. Compressed SENSE single-breath-hold and free-breathing cine imaging for accelerated clinical evaluation of the left ventricle. Clin Radiol, 2019, 74(4): 325.e9-325.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.12.012
19
Kido T, Kido T, Nakamura M, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass on free-breathing compressed sensing real-time cine imaging. Circ J, 2017, 81(10): 1463-1468. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0123
20
Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 58(6): 1182-1195. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21391
21
Tomoyuki K, Teruhito K, Masashi N, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass on free-breathing compressed sensing real-time cine imaging. Circ J, 2017, 81(10): 1463-1468. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0123
22
Vermersch M, Longère B, Coisne A, et al. Compressed sensing real-time cine imaging for assessment of ventricular function, volumes and mass in clinical practice. Eur Radiol, 2020, 30(1): 609-619. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06341-2
23
Klinke V, Muzzarelli S, Lauriers N, et al. Quality assessment of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the setting of the European CMR registry: description and validation of standardized criteria. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2013, 15(1): 55-67. DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-55

PREV The value of diffusion-weighted imaging of single index, double index and stretch index models in the differential diagnosis of orbital benign and malignant tumors
NEXT Image quality assessment on MR images of the prostate acquired in different diffusion weighted sequences
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn