Share：
Share this content in WeChat
X
[Chinese][PDF]6562
• Technical Article •
Application of compressed sensing technology in rapid lumbar magnetic resonance imaging
ZHANG Haonan  SONG Qingwei  ZHANG Nan  SONG Yu  PU Renwang  WANG Nan  LIU Ailian 

Cite this article as: ZHANG H N, SONG Q W, ZHANG N, et al. Application of compressed sensing technology in rapid lumbar magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 14(2): 132-137, 144. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.02.022.


[Abstract] Objective To explore the influence of different acceleration factors (AF) of compressed sensing (CS) on the quality of lumbar MRI images.Materials and Methods Thirty-two subjects (twelve males) were recruited with an average age of (45.28±14.11) years. The sagittal T1WI, T2WI, and axial T2WI sequences of the lumbar spine were scanned with 3.0 T MR equipment through the sensitivity encoding (SENSE), and CS technology for AF=0, SENSE AF=2, CS AF=2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. Two radiologists delineated the region of interest (ROI) on the sagittal T1WI, T2WI and transverse T2WI to measure the signal intensity (SI) and standard deviation (SD). Then we calculated the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). Finally, subjective score of image quality was assessed by five points method. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kappa test was adopted to evaluate the consistency of the scores from the two radiologists. In the following analysis, the ANOVA test was used to assess the difference of SNR, CNR and score between groups.Results The measured datas and the subjective score of the two radiologists were in good agreement (ICC: 0.878-0.997, Kappa: 0.763-0.948). It was shown that there were statistically significant differences in SNR, CNR and subjective score of sagittal T1WI, T2WI and transverse T2WI sequences. If the CS equaled 4, the SNR, CNR and subjective score of sagittal T1WI and T2WI were significantly different from those of conventional sequences (P＜0.05). If the CS equaled 3, the SNR, CNR and subjective score of axial T2WI were significantly different from conventional sequences (P＜0.05).Conclusions Scan time for the lumbar spine decreased gradually with increase of the CS AF. CS factor of 3 was recommended for clinical sagittal T1WI and T2WI, and CS factor of 2 was best for clinical transverse T2WI to achieve an optimal balance between scan time and image quality.
[Keywords] lumbar spine；magnetic resonance imaging；compressed sensing；two dimensional；motion artifact

ZHANG Haonan1   SONG Qingwei1*   ZHANG Nan1   SONG Yu2   PU Renwang1   WANG Nan1   LIU Ailian1  

1 Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China

2 Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China

*Correspondence to: Song QW, E-mail: songqw1964@163.com

Conflicts of interest   None.

Received  2022-10-06
Accepted  2023-01-17
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.02.022
Cite this article as: ZHANG H N, SONG Q W, ZHANG N, et al. Application of compressed sensing technology in rapid lumbar magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 14(2): 132-137, 144. DOI:10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.02.022.

[1]
LIN F G, ZHOU X Z, ZHANG B, et al. Utility of flexion-extension radiographs with brackets and magnetic resonance facet fluid for the assessment of lumbar instability in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis[J/OL]. World Neurosurg, 2022: S1878-S8750(22)01225-6 [2022-10-28]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1878875022012256. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.115.
[2]
XU C Q, YIN M C, MO W. Correlation and differences in lumbopelvic sagittal alignment parameters between lumbar radiographs and magnetic resonance images[J]. Global Spine J, 2022, 12(1): 79-84. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220947049.
[3]
WU P H, HUANG C Y, LI W H, et al. Application of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in the clinical diagnosis of disc herniation after lumbar spine injury[J/OL]. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021: 6610988 [2022-09-28]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7969098/. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6610988.
[4]
ZHANG X Y, GUO Y X, PAXON J M, et al. The value of quantitative assessment of lumbar disc degeneration with T2 mapping: a Meta analysis[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(8): 55-59, 70. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.08.010.
[5]
LORENC T, GOŁĘBIOWSKI M, MICHALSKI W, et al. High-resolution, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging axial load dynamic study improves diagnostics of the lumbar spine in clinical practice[J]. World J Orthop, 2022, 13(1): 87-101. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.87.
[6]
ZHANG Y Q, DING J L, GONG T, et al. Comparative study of 3D-FLAIR sequence based on compressed sensing and the conventional 2D-FLAIR sequence in white matter lesion imaging[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 13(4): 100-102, 119. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2022.04.018.
[7]
XIA S, QI J. Advantages of MR parallel acquisition technology[J]. Foreign Med Sci Clin Radiol Fascicle, 2006, 29(5): 348-353. DOI: 10.3784/j.issn.1674-1897.2006.05.016.
[8]
CROP F, GUILLAUD O, BEN HAJ AMOR M, et al. Comparison of compressed sensing and controlled aliasing in parallel imaging acceleration for 3D magnetic resonance imaging for radiotherapy preparation[J]. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2022, 23: 44-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.008.
[9]
VORNETTI G, BARTIROMO F, TONI F, et al. Follow-up assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling: comparison of compressed sensing and parallel imaging time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography[J]. Tomography, 2022, 8(3): 1608-1617. DOI: 10.3390/tomography8030133.
[10]
KIDO T, HIRAI K, OGAWA R, et al. Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment[J/OL]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2021, 23(1): 10 [2022-12-29]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7898736/. DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00708-5.
[11]
NARESH N K, MALONE L, FUJIWARA T, et al. Use of compressed sensing to reduce scan time and breath-holding for cardiac cine balanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging in children and young adults[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2021, 51(7): 1192-1201. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04952-2.
[12]
MORITA K, NAKAURA T, MARUYAMA N, et al. Hybrid of compressed sensing and parallel imaging applied to three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging of the lumbar spine[J]. Magn Reson Med Sci, 2020, 19(1): 48-55. DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0132.
[13]
BRATKE G, RAU R, KABBASCH C, et al. Speeding up the clinical routine: compressed sensing for 2D imaging of lumbar spine disc herniation[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2021, 140: 109738 [2022-10-25]. https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(21)00219-9/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109738.
[14]
HUANG R F, PAN F M, KONG C, et al. Age- and sex-dependent differences in the morphology and composition of paraspinal muscles between subjects with and without lumbar degenerative diseases[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1): 734 [2022-12-29]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9341069/. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05692-0.
[15]
HIDA T, EASTLACK R K, KANEMURA T, et al. Effect of race, age, and gender on lumbar muscle volume and fat infiltration in the degenerative spine[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2021, 26(1): 69-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.09.006.
[16]
GAO F, LIU S, ZHANG X D, et al. Automated grading of lumbar disc degeneration using a push-pull regularization network based on MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 53(3): 799-806. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27400.
[17]
FUKUSHIMA Y, MATSUDA A, KOIZUMI K, et al. Usefulness of model-based iterative reconstruction in low-dose lumbar spine CT after spine surgery with metal implant: a phantom study[J]. Acta Radiol, 2021, 62(10): 1333-1340. DOI: 10.1177/0284185120961424.
[18]
MORBÉE L, CHEN M, HERREGODS N, et al. MRI-based synthetic CT of the lumbar spine: geometric measurements for surgery planning in comparison with CT[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2021, 144: 109999 [2022-10-13]. https://www.ejradiology.com/article/S0720-048X(21)00480-0/fulltext. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109999.
[19]
SHAYGANFAR A, KHODAYI M, EBRAHIMIAN S, et al. Quantitative diagnosis of osteoporosis using lumbar spine signal intensity in magnetic resonance imaging[J/OL]. Br J Radiol, 2019, 92(1097): 20180774 [2022-10-13]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6580909. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180774.
[20]
HUANG C C, JAW F S, YOUNG Y H. Radiological and functional assessment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis[J/OL]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1): 137 [2022-12-29]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8829986/. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05053-x.
[21]
DE BUCK M H S, JEZZARD P, HESS A T. Optimization of undersampling parameters for 3D intracranial compressed sensing MR angiography at 7 T[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2022, 88(2): 880-889. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29236.
[22]
GARREAU M, PUISEUX T, TOUPIN S, et al. Accelerated sequences of 4D flow MRI using GRAPPA and compressed sensing: a comparison against conventional MRI and computational fluid dynamics[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2022, 88(6): 2432-2446. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29404.
[23]
OBAMA Y, OHNO Y, YAMAMOTO K, et al. MR imaging for shoulder diseases: effect of compressed sensing and deep learning reconstruction on examination time and imaging quality compared with that of parallel imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 94: 56-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.08.004.
[24]
AOIKE T, FUJIMA N, YONEYAMA M, et al. Development of three-dimensional MR neurography using an optimized combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2022, 87: 32-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.12.002.
[25]
KIM D, HEO Y J, JEONG H W, et al. Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography[J]. Neuroradiol J, 2021, 34(3): 213-221. DOI: 10.1177/1971400920988099.
[26]
BENJAMIN A J V, BANO W, MAIR G, et al. Diagnostic quality assessment of IR-prepared 3D magnetic resonance neuroimaging accelerated using compressed sensing and k-space sampling order optimization[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 74: 31-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.08.025.
[27]
KIM J, SEO N, BAE H, et al. Comparison of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) and compressed sensing-SENSE for contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging in patients with crohn disease undergoing MR enterography[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2022, 218(4): 678-686. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.21.26733.
[28]
REN S J, WU W, SU C Q, et al. High-resolution compressed sensing time-of-flight MR angiography outperforms CT angiography for evaluating patients with Moyamoya disease after surgical revascularization[J/OL]. BMC Med Imaging, 2022, 22(1): 64 [2022-12-29]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC898840/. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00790-w.
[29]
LUSTIG M, DONOHO D, PAULY J M. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2007, 58(6): 1182-1195. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21391.
[30]
CHOI E S, KIM J S, NICKEL M D, et al. Free-breathing contrast-enhanced multiphase MRI of the liver in patients with a high risk of breath-holding failure: comparison of compressed sensing-accelerated radial and Cartesian acquisition techniques[J]. Acta Radiol, 2022, 63(11): 1453-1462. DOI: 10.1177/02841851211052988.
[31]
YAMADA T, MASUI T, SASAKI M, et al. Time resolved DCE-MRI of the kidneys: evaluation of the renal vasculatures and tumors using F-DISCO with and without compressed sensing in normal and wide-bore 3T systems[J/OL]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2022, 101(31): e29971 [2022-09-28]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9351894.
[32]
PU R W, LIU A L, WANG J Z, et al. Influence of different compressed-sensing acceleration factors on three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography image quality[J]. J Pract Radiol, 2021, 37(1): 128-131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2021.01.031.
[33]
LIN Q, WANG J J, SUN M H, et al. Clinical application of cardiac magnetic resonance compressed sensing cine imaging[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2020, 36(2): 281-286. DOI: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2020.02.027.
[34]
WANG X D, LIU A L, ZHANG Q H, et al. Impact of compressed sensing technology on 3D mDIXON Quant liver fat quantification[J]. Chin J Med Imaging Technol, 2020, 36(11): 1662-1666. DOI: 10.13929/j.issn.1003-3289.2020.11.016.
[35]
BRATKE G, RAU R, WEISS K, et al. Accelerated MRI of the lumbar spine using compressed sensing: quality and efficiency[J/OL]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 49(7): e164-e175 [2022-09-28]. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.26526. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26526.
[36]
SONG Y, SONG Q W, ZHANG H N, et al. 3D mDixon Quant based on compressed SENSE for quantitative study of lumbar vertebral body fat content[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(4): 51-56. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.04.010.

PREV A comparative study of three scanning sequences on the arterial phase and image quality of gadoxetic acid disodium liver-enhanced MRI
NEXT A multi-parameter water-model based quality control method for magnetic resonance imaging
  


LINK


Tel & Fax: +8610-67113815    E-mail: editor@cjmri.cn